LOL NOT EVEN CLOSE Vilkas is alright at best, remote control turret ability to lock on to aircraft ect ect imo vilkas is def one of the better ones
1 Like
While that would definitely end up leaving the Falcon at 8.3, at least that would make it realistic (and probably even more deadly lol)
Ahahahaha that shit is hilarious, missile goes for the next missile. Honestly you would’ve been better dropping the lock and relocking, it would’ve negated this problem.
Vehicle: T-35
Gamemode: Ground Arcade
BR Change: 1.3 -----> 2.0 or 2.3
Reason: Compared to the T-28 the only downside is a slightly lower speed while still having a similar armor layout and more crew (+4) and an additional cannon that can face forward. This allows it to perform really well since at it’s current BR range it allows the additional cannon to penetrate most of the tank that it can face while keeping the main gun loaded for a follow up shot.
Like what? The dutch Ah-64D is at 11.7 and it’s nearly identical to the US Ah-64D, the only difference is the lack of radar. So unless you’re saying that having a radar is a game changer, then it won’t change much.
Hellfire-only platforms over 11.3 are over BR’d to begin with.
There are other BR changes that needs to be done. One for example being the Mi-28A. I have no idea why that thing is at 11.0. It’s the same BR as the AH-1W is also at the same BR
It wouldn’t…
As mentioned previously, hellfires are extremely unreliable at range (5ish km) where as the Vikhrs can reach 8km easily and could possibly reach to 10km (in most cases, it does). Because of Beam riding, you could bypass smoke, switch targets easily, and be more accurate. In addition having proxy fuse agms allows you to take out helis/planes and can proxy SAMs with ease.
Barely no-one will use the JAGM-MR above 8km let alone 10km. It take 30 seconds to hit a 8km target and 40 to hit a 10km target. It is not profitable nor a good tactic to use JAGMs at that range.
The JAGM-MR isn’t good because of it’s range, it’s good because of it’s motor. It has a sustainer meaning that it could maintain speed which allows it to be accurate with range. Something the hellfire cannot do
With all this being said, you cannot say to me with a straight face that the Ka52 and Ah-64D is balanced at the same BR. If you wanted to bring the Ka52 up to 12.3, then I’ll be okay with that but these two cannot be the same BR
Why is Grippen A still 12.0 in TRB?
And is on the same br as SU-27?
Grippen must be moved to 12.3
This might make no change in TRB, but in squadron 8vs8 battles, people just take 4 grippens and that’s a win.
No single jet can give the same performance on that BR
(Air RB) F-14A [12.7 → 12.3]
Reason:
Weak performance in comparison with F-15A that will be downgraded to 12.7. Some people can say that phoenixes is menace to 11.3 aircraft - partially yes, against inexperienced players, but in still can be dodged successfully.
We need more decompression in general.
4 Likes
It has terrible air to air besides Su-27 is great as CAP love my su
as i said earlier my post was obvious bait i dont know why you’re eating it so much
and i cant see a reason to move it down by 1.3 brs… move it to 7.7 and you’re getting games with props. leave it at 8.0 and you can see some pretty fast jets. i leave tu4s alone at the beginning of games myself but thats beside the point
in what world is the .50 bad
The AV-8B NA is much better than the Sea Harrier FRS.1. The 11.3 ARB BR is warranted.
Its GRB BR should be fine as well based on the AV-8B+ and Harrier GR.7s BRs.
If they removed its APDS and left its belts untouched it would go from 110 to 58 pen. For a SAP round it never used.
In Air RB (ARB), moving top tier from 14.3 to 14.7 is going to pull more players into the new max bracket, which probably means the 13.3 Fox-3 premium Su-30MK2/MKK will see more downtiers into 12.3–12.7—and that’s the issue: 12.3 jets mostly don’t have Fox-3s (and the F-14’s Phoenix is a more limited/older Fox-3 compared to modern ARH missiles, so it makes sense at its BR), so you’re increasing how often that bracket gets dumped into an ARH missile environment with no real answer, and it’ll just lead to more lobbies being farmed by those two premiums (I’m already seeing it from the 12.7 side in stuff like the MiG-29 Sniper and F-18C with no Fox-3 options).
However, grippen can destroy su27 easily and after that get to destroying ground, without even changing loadout and it has nice resolution IR pod.
All Su27 has is R73 against it and with air to ground loadout it’s even worse in a dogfight, also everything it has, is unguided.
I also love Su-27, but let’s speak objectively
one where the average enemy is a steel jet fighter with 20mms and even larger calibers on some
They haven’t sold enough yet. Once the sales goal is reached, it will get nerfed. It’s their pattern.
I’m a fan of the proposed reorganisation of the Chinese air tree, for the most part. However, it doesn’t make sense to move the J-11s to the end of the bomber branch rather than simply add a second PLA fighter branch for the flankers (which would also allow the Chinese tree to finally have five branches rather than four) and save the bomber line for something that actually fits, such as the J-16 or even maybe the H-6.
2 Likes
Why are you using the Su-27 for CAS? I keep.it as my CAP fighter for swatting the enemy CAS down. I keep 2 planes for ground 1 for CAS the other for CAP. Im not gonna hamper my Su-27 for a role.its not great at. It was made with air superiority as its focus unlike Gripen which is a light multirole fighter.
Could be argued it’s a little better than the Gr7/T10 with a much better tpod, though more limited loadout and weaker A2A (for the Gr7)
Why are the rank 9s not folded ? Why research both Eurofighter that will most likely cost almost if not 500k RP each ?
1 Like
Doesn’t make sense at the moment but if/when they get better AAMs it probably will.