Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

From what i’ve heard from people with it. Its basically spam them at anything and everything you see, and if the blood sacrifice you made prior to launch was good enough, you might get a few kills. You might not.

My experience with the Boxer has been much the same

10 Spikes, pretty good.

1 Like

Honestly, I think this adjustment is worse than doing nothing. The F-15A is now 12.7, making existing 12.7 fighters obsolete, while the J-10C and F/A-18E are 14.7. Meanwhile, the F-15C GE and Su-30SM/MKM remain at 14.3. Does Gaijin even play WarThunder?

1 Like

Yeah, its all nonsense

2 Likes

ASB lol

Mode: Air Realistic

Vehicle: F4F-Early (germany)

BR Change: 10,7 → 10,0

Reasoning: Its the only flaresless plane that sits so high. It constantly faces planes with all aspect IR missiles. It only has rear aspect 18G IR missiles to defend itself. It even has to face potent radar missiles which it cant defend without chaff.

2 Likes

Oh right, then, pretty easy.

I dont bother with battlefields or convoys, because… I just dont see the point, but bases and naval targets are stupidly easy between CCIP and CCRP. Even AFs are a doddle as you can climb super high really easily and use the bomb sight

1 Like

14.7 IS NOT ENOUGH!!!

Battleratings are compressed to oblivion, and altrough +0.3 is something, that won’t change much overall.

Regarding the preliminary BR changes for AirRB:

1-Why keep the gripen E lower in BR than the likes of the J-10C?? It should share the same BR.

2-WHY move 13.0 F-15s to 12.7?? Are you crazy? They aren’t the best like the su-27 but they are way too strong for 12.7, considering the other 12.7 don’t move down. There are many 13.0 jets that are worse than the 13.0 F-15s. It’s outrageous to keep the F-14B or the belgian F-16A higher in BR than the F-15A for example.

3-Why F-16I Sufa remains at 14.0? Regardless of some 14.0/14.3 going up, it is at its core a 13.7 jet.

4-Why the squadron F-16 OCU doesn’t go to the same BR as the WORSE variant in the TT that sits at 13.0? If anything, the TT belgian F-16A could go down, or preferably move most 13.0+ up by a step to create some decompression.

I would give my BR changes recommendations, but with just 14.7 as top BR, most of them are not really possible to do because it would create different issues.

2 Likes

Eather give it M900 or bring it back on 11.3 :)

Change how replies work on this blog, so damn confusing…
Isnt it possible to just make posts with replies being only underneath that post (like idk in youtube?)

BMP-2 is a slightly better comparison, but the 2S38 was not, that’s all I was saying. One’s tracked, the other is wheeled. One only has an autocannon, the other also gets spikes. One uses a 57mm autocannon that can also take on aerial threats and has much stronger penetration power, the other is weaker. Being light tanks is really the only similarity, that’s all I was getting at.

why do i have to scroll every reply to a remote reply to the main argument

image

Everything below 50% indicates most of Ger WW2 vehicles are too high BRed.

Worst WR is at 8.0 and its carried by Leopard 1 tanks So it needs to be one tick lower. 7.3 would be probably more appropriate.

Man the german mains always complains so much about the leopard 1 but then when you play it is a perfectly fine vehicle for 8.0, just finish spading it and my only complain was the hilariously bad german teammates at 8.0.

8 Likes

Tell German players to stop being bots, and maybe their winrates would increase.

4 Likes

proof that german mains are bad at the game so what

Compared to PUMA or AJEX, the 2S38 will explode with just a touch, whereas these two have armor that can withstand small-caliber autocannons. In addition, their gun depression also helps them adapt to most maps.

1 Like

Even if so. A game needs to be balanced. When German players are worse than the others, the BRs need to go down until there’s some kind of balance. Thats exactly what Gajin’s stat based BR changes are about. Nice that we agree.