Why is the Falcon not listed for a BR reduction to go along with the removal of the APDS?
1 Like
the AJS37 doesnt have launch warning, but is has gone down since then and the f-14 gone up
so that might be where i remember it from
still getting 6 fire and forget missles with massive range
where multipath still results in a 50/50 death chance is just kinda insane when the competition has 2 shitty radar missles and 4 ir missles (JA37D, MiG-29)
(R-27ERs are decent but the MiG-29 radar is quite poor which makes it so you cant take full advantage of the missle)
or even just 6 non-irccm ir missles (Netz)
I don’t have Tu-4 and H-5 researched in Chinese tech tree, does that mean I will need to research them in order to start researching J-11 familiy? I don’t have any RP on them yet.
I got a question, why 2S38 would be put into 10.7 but 80UD was still at 10.3? I just wonder, at this Br, T80UD with 6’s reload (add some bush) it consider OP instead an 57mm autocannon (but it was spam xD)
1 Like
The Terminator cannot use APFSDS due to its feed system, nor does it need it to be 12.3 minimum. I’ve been using it at 12.7 and have a 2KD in it while rushing like an idiot.
1 Like
Falcon and AMX-30 S DCA doesn’t make sense to get rid of APDS… after that we are going to remove gepards variants APDS also? And put it higher battle rating. What’s the bigger picture here or the long game?
3 Likes
In air rb?
All I’ve ever experienced is being swarmed by every plane on the enemy team.
Better late than never, but gaijin knows never is better than late cause it would mean they never went back on their decisions!
T-62 has 115mm gun while T-55 has 100mm one, that is big difference. What is more T-62 has better turret armor and a lot lower profile than T-55. I wouldn’t touch br’s of those vehicles and i guess Gaijin will not too, because they are good where they are for now.
11.0 is a better place for it imo
the difference is that the gepards and such only get 40 rounds,
the falcon get 1 in every 4 rounds
which makes it get a lot more apds in total
A BR drop for the Merkava doesn’t do anything for it because it’s still lolpennable by 8.0 BR darts. The Namer and the Merkava need to be armor buffed more to make them worth being 11.3.
Russian tanks after 9.7 need to be reworked and brought up in BR (Reduction in armour if kept at the same B.R). Most if not all of the Russian tanks between 10.0 and 11.7 need to be brought up in BR by at least 1.0 to improve the balance. If you want to play 10.3 or 10.7 Ground RB for example and you end up facing USSR then you already know your 10.7 MBT APFSDS just won’t penetrate anywhere, and on the other hand if they are on your team you already know they will be stealing your kills with the insane Russian bias these game developers love. I personally loved playing USSR until I wanted to research a different country. This may be your thousandth time hearing this but this is true.
2 Likes
theres alot of spaas that use apds which dont seem right removing it from the falcon yes it was a prototype vehicle dosent mean it should follow the same rules as other vehicles, the apds was the only thing keeping it alive
Vehicles: Strf 9040B, Strf 9040 BILL, Lvkv 9040C.
Game mode: Ground Realistic battles
Battle rating: Strf 9040B →10.0, Strf 9040 BILL and Lvkv 9040C stay 10.3
Loadout change: slpprj m/01 to all 9040s
Reason: Currently with the state of the 10.3 BR bracket seeing more modern vehicles being added to the game with increased capabilities etc I see it fit to give the rest of the 9040s there proper round to keep up with other vehicles recently added to the BR bracket. With these changes each vehicle will retain their uniqueness.
The 9040B will still be a lower BR then the rest but without the increased armor of the 9040C and the 9040 BILL and Lvkv9040c will also still have their unique roles.
please let the B alone
also the BILL shouldnt get it due to its age
I agree the T-80UD is a lower BR then the M1 and 2A4 but with equal if not better performance.
Buc S2 does okay, Its fast enough to get around and has the defensive suite to deal with missiles.
Buc S1 is just sad though with the far weaker engines, Could easily be 8.3 or have air spawn
Buc S2B… Its a 9.7 with 2x Aim-9Ls. Could be 10.3 could be 10.7, really on the fence about it, but with the sheer compression at that BR it should be 10.3. As a ground attacker, its pretty poor, But few ground attakers at that BR do well in their primary role. So nothing new there.
So they can be a really tricky aircraft to balance at the moment.
But if they removed the diminishing returns mechanics and added objectives where their sheer weapons load actually could be used… Theyd be very good.
In ASB I cant be bothered with the S1, but had very good success with the S2 and S2B. Especially since they modeled their wings to be made out of something other than wet paper mache
since F-15A/J downtiers to 12.7, should be fair to give some jet IRCCM (cough cough MIG-29) unless both of those lose AIM-9M and made AIM-9L as main IR missile, heck why Yak-141 not get R-73 if it just 4 like they already have 4 IRCCM R-27T+27ET possible
1 Like
How about one step more, move the Tornados to the first line and have the second line an export/Commonwealth line from the lightning like ground is ?
1 Like