I would prefer they keep pushing reloads in the direction of faster, considering that there are indications of a 20rpm first minute for the Abrams, but it should stay at 5.0s for the foreseeable future. However, A1 is perfectly acceptable.
F/A–18E moving up to 14.7 is hilarious though I’ll give Gaijin that
ZTZ96
Ground RB
9.3 → 9.7
Similar to the T-72A and T-72M1, the ZTZ96 features respectable turret armor, decent mobility, and incredible firepower that is more on-par with 10.3+ MBTs. It also should not be facing vehicles in the 8.3 range, many of which are firing basic APDS, some of which lack stabilizers, and even some 8.7s.
F-111A
ARB
10.7 → 10.3
Changes:
Upgrade AIM-9B to AIM-9E
for 10.7 its got extremely poor flight performance, and AIM-9Bs are hopeless, AIM-9Es at least stand a chance
Vehicle: TU-4
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 8.0 —> 7.0
Reason: Its a B29 with 23mm guns yes they are bigger caliber but they are less and the 0.50cals are deadly too
ZA-35 and XM246 don’t have APDS.
And the rest only get 40 rounds at maximum.
XM246 has probably been confirmed that it should have the APDS belts though.
And with the Swiss gun system, the dedicated APDS box on these guns make removing the APDS more silly than anything.
Falcon should move to 8.0 in ground RB after this change though.
AMX-30DCA IMO is fine cause its radar and guns make quick work of jets.
If reloads are meant to be used for balance, then they should be used for that. If not, time to give everything maximum possible reloads
Mode: Naval AB & RB
Vessel: USS Aylwin
Change: 3.7 → 4.0
Reasoning: Borderline impossible to kill for any 2.7-3.3 boats, also has better protection than its peers at 3.7 and has no obvious ammo rack weak spots. Roughly equivalent to the Erich Steinbrinck and Yukikaze
F-15 at 12.7? there’s zero reason why the 12.7 MiG-29s cant have its R-73s now lmao
I feel battle rating 14.7 (Air AB, RB, SB) it might not be for 4.5 gen fighter aircraft if gajin prepare the early 5th gen infrared Air-to-Air Missile
I’m of the opinion that decompression maximum battle rating to 15.0 or 15.3
I don’t understand that. Neither of them have supercharge at the minute do they?
Vehicle EFV
Game-mode Ground Realistic
BR Change 9.3 - 8.7
Reason - The EFV has practically paper thin armor and minimal penetration to be at 9.3, the Bradley is at 8.3 and has superior penetration, weaponry, and speed compared to the EFV.
Falcon looks to be one of the worst offenders at that range, alongside XM246.
T-34 (1940), T-34(P)
GRB 3.3 → 4.0
While worse armed than the other T-34s at 4.0, these T-34s are lighter with more mobility, and are OBSCENELY strong at 3.3
i hope the amx a-1a will finally move down a bit more
it shouldnt be higher with worse missiles and a worse gun than the tech tree one
Also disabling both of its turrets takes a huge chunk of its crew away
AIR SIMULATOR
F8U-2 10.0 → 10.7
Flares, great missiles and guns, great flight performance. Completely ruins 10.0.
Vanguard does, but its only enough to justify being 0.3 higher than Hood.
KGV, dont think so. Rileyy is working on it I think
7.0 is much too low
7.7 is possible
but no lower
those 23mm guns are lethal
Pz IV H
3.7 → 4.0
This is a very strong 3.7, it should be moved upwards