Reasoning: HMS Churchill is one of the most underperforming and weakest destroyers at 3.3 due to its extremely limited armament. Its sole 102 mm primary gun, backed only by mediocre AA weapons, leaves it severely underpowered compared to other destroyers at the same BR. Against 4.3 destroyers, it doesn’t stand a chance and is consistently outclassed. Lowering its BR to 3.0 would make it more playable.
Naval RB - L9059 : 2.7 > 2.3
This ship is pretty big but it’s armor is like paper. Turret rotation is pretty slow and can be tricky to use because of their positioning. Reload is slow. And last,the speed of the ship does not exceed 25 km/h. It would benefit to see his BR decrease to 2.3 where you can use it on a line up with the Aconit.
I would prefer they keep pushing reloads in the direction of faster, considering that there are indications of a 20rpm first minute for the Abrams, but it should stay at 5.0s for the foreseeable future. However, A1 is perfectly acceptable.
Similar to the T-72A and T-72M1, the ZTZ96 features respectable turret armor, decent mobility, and incredible firepower that is more on-par with 10.3+ MBTs. It also should not be facing vehicles in the 8.3 range, many of which are firing basic APDS, some of which lack stabilizers, and even some 8.7s.
Vehicle: TU-4 Gamemode: Air Realistic BR Change: 8.0 —> 7.0 Reason: Its a B29 with 23mm guns yes they are bigger caliber but they are less and the 0.50cals are deadly too
ZA-35 and XM246 don’t have APDS.
And the rest only get 40 rounds at maximum.
XM246 has probably been confirmed that it should have the APDS belts though.
And with the Swiss gun system, the dedicated APDS box on these guns make removing the APDS more silly than anything.
Falcon should move to 8.0 in ground RB after this change though.
AMX-30DCA IMO is fine cause its radar and guns make quick work of jets.
Reasoning: Borderline impossible to kill for any 2.7-3.3 boats, also has better protection than its peers at 3.7 and has no obvious ammo rack weak spots. Roughly equivalent to the Erich Steinbrinck and Yukikaze
Reason - The EFV has practically paper thin armor and minimal penetration to be at 9.3, the Bradley is at 8.3 and has superior penetration, weaponry, and speed compared to the EFV.