The t64b being 10.3 is so stupid it melts my brain. When the t80ud is at the same br lol.
0.93 KDR per statshark for the last month, it wont be moved.
Mode: Naval AB & RB
Vessel: Pr. 206 and Pr. 206 (Germany)
Change: 4.3 → 4.7
Reasoning: One of the best Cold War versatile boats that’s currently overperforming due to rapid-firing 30mm cannons and powerful torpedoes. They can shred WWII-era coastal boats with little effort and should be moved up.
i free aced its crew at 8.7, itll do fine
Vessels: PT-565
BR change: Move the 565 down to 2.7 or even 2.3 and folder it with the 314
Reasoning: Literally the same vehicle as the PT-314 only with rocket launchers, as elaborated here
Churchill VII/croc, Cromwell V (all), Valentine XI, Excelsior
No BR changes
Change:
Naval
SKR 1& SKR-7
4.3 > 4.7
Reason…after the reload nerfs they were less effective against opposition 4.3 DDs. But since then the Bluewater BR rebalance has seen several of these destroyers move up to 4.7 whilst the coastal have remained static. It’s not helped by the total lack of USA ships at 4.3 (literally none for BW or Coastal) so you have an entire nation impotent at the BR.
On par with anything else at that BR
Better than multiple 12.3/12.7 shells.
So its better than more than a few top tier tanks in 2/3 of the main categories and as for survivability, outperforms more than a few in that regard too
Mode: Naval AB & RB
Vessel: SKR-1
Change: 4.3 → 4.7
Reasoning: Overperforming with rapid-firing 76mm guns and versatile secondary armament. If Köln and Lübeck are raised, SKR-1 should be as well, to avoid unfair matchups against weaker vessels.
If the early F-15s are going down to 12.7 either remove their 9Ms or give R73s to MiG-29s/move them down to 12.3, and make the 29G 12.7
Mode: Naval AB & RB
Vessel: SKR-7
Change: 4.3 → 4.7
Reasoning: Overperforming with rapid-firing 76mm guns and versatile secondary armament. If Köln and Lübeck are raised, SKR-7 should be as well, to avoid unfair matchups against weaker vessels.
Flakpanzer 341
Ground RB 7.0 → 9.0
It has almost 90mm of pen on its APHE, is the strongest tank destroyer AA by far and yet it doesn’t move
They should have moved golden eagle up and F-18E at 14.3
T-80UD
Ground RB
10.3 → 10.7
It is way too powerful at 10.3, it is essentially a T-80U with slightly weaker front armor and less mobility, or a T-80B with slightly stronger frontal armor and less mobility. Compared to the Chinese T-80UD/DU1, the only real difference is the lack of thermals, which is a disadvantage but enough to justify the BR decrease. This should not be facing 9.3 tanks like the MBT-70, which it totally outclasses in all ways, and is without a shadow of a doubt superior to contemporary MBTs at 10.3 like the ZTZ96A or T-72B. With the recent reload buff this change is further justified.
Don’t forget the F-84F
IF THE F15A is allowed to be 12.7 with irccm
PLEASE give the mig29 its R73 and remove the ER (Plus fix the engines)
and keep it 12.7 please
stop abusing my boy
Mode: Naval AB & RB
Vessel: Fairmile H LCS(L)(2)
Change: 2.3 → 2.0 (Best if at 1.7)
Reasoning: Extremely slow and fragile, with a weak 57mm gun with a slow rate of fire and a highly vulnerable ammo rack in the bow.
Mode: Naval AB & RB
Vessel: HMS Liscomb
Changes:
- AB: 2.0 → 2.7
- RB: 2.3 → 2.7
Reasoning: With a detailed damage model, Liscomb is now much tougher and performs far above its current BR.
both at 8.0
QN-506
Ground RB
10.0 → 9.7
Reclassify from Light Tank to Tank Destroyer, similar to the BMPTs
Compared to other vehicles with Fire-and-Forget missiles, the QN-506 is sorely lacking in one major feature: mobility. The QN502 missiles are extremely unreliable at killing enemy ground vehicles in most situations on most maps, and are best used as an anti-helicopter weapon, while the QN201 missiles are utterly useless despite their stated penetration. Vehicles like the Freccia and KF41, while not exactly great, can compensate for this with good mobility to complement their autocannon, but the QN506 simply cannot.