Planned Battle Rating Changes (January 2026)

F-14D with AIM-120s cause thats the one that did get a case study for adaptation and the 14A already had tested the AIM-120 would make the F-14B kinda sad



1 Like

That’s an F-14A that would have AIM-120s.

In those cases, yes the Tunguska may not be the most ideal, though intercepting mavericks given that amount of time shouldn’t be hard at all.
Mavericks are a lot more difficult to deal with when they have been launched from much closer.

If you so happen to be killed by enemy tanks from your spawn / near your spawn then it’s bad map design and / or your teammates failing you.
From my experience, if that does ever happen it’s usually the latter.

I mean that’s always a case, though from my experience in the Su-25T, it’s rarely the case.
Strelas spawning in immediately after dying to CAS is something that does happen quite often, though.

Not all the time.
Helicopters tend to stay around 4km/5km.
It’s not just the range but also how quickly it gets there.

Yes, OSA is a bigger threat at range… but only by so much.
~21.5s in a straight line to get to a target spamming mavericks from 10km away sounds awful.
You’re better off not even shooting at it.
And relying on teammates to protect you seems very inconsistent.

100%
They need to fix drone hitboxes because they often like to survive proxy from AAMs.

1 Like

I agree with you here.

I mean it could probably be fine there, though 8.7 seems reasonable to me too.

1 Like

It really is such a good list gaijin should be taking notes ;D

Vehicle: sav 20.12.48
current br 3.7-> 4.7
currently absolutly dominates against 2.7 and still keeps up against 4.7 no isssue.
if it has to face 5.7 this will still perfom valid

2 Likes

what is blud yapping about?

3 Likes

Vehicle: Jagdtiger
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: N/A
Change: Give a small buff to its reload speed.

Reason: The Jagdtiger has been especially hurt by the recent changes to the engine it shares with the Tiger IIs. It was a vehicle of limited mobility before, now that mobility is severely hampered. Combined with its poor gun handling/low targeting speed, and the increasing matchmaker skew towards CQC and city maps, it could use a bit of help to incentivise it being actually played.

A small reload buff would ameliorate the issue. Several SPGs have recently received buffs to their reload speeds for similar reasons. The Jagdtiger has two dedicated loaders to handle its two-piece ammunition in a roomy casemate, but the reload remains very high, at 18.6s for an aced crew. A small buff would be compatible with the vehicle’s internal layout and crew, so there is no real downside.

5 Likes

Vehicle: BMPT
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 11.3 → 12.0 or higher
Reason: Still too OP at its current BR

I mean, the average British Main’s stats are higher than the average German Main.

think now the british typhoons should be moved now to after the tornado f3 late where they should be and then also move the fgr2 phantom to before the tornado f3 early and lower the br to 11.3/11.7. ready so that line can be made ready to take more south african jets and maybe more indian aircraft

RUSSIAN 4.7 needs to move up


@Firestarter @Tim_TeaDrinker @Beeschurger

2 Likes

swis F5E missing in 10_2 sim event…

Vt4 Tank RB

Rank VIII → VII (where it currently sits)
BR: 12.3 → 11.7

As of right now, the VT4 is a very weird tank in the tech tree that doesnt feel like it has any point of being played over any tank at 12.3 and honestly even when compared to the Al Khaled it doesnt really offer anything over that tank, therefore i would suggest to make it go down in BR to 11.7 in order to make it fit into that nice Chinese lineup on that BR where if a player is not owning the Al Khaled it would offer a tradeoff to the MBT 2000, as you are losing mobility but therefore gaining better optics and a bit of reload

3 Likes

The British Typhoons are after the Tornado F.3 Late though? A full BR above it at 14.3 and now 14.7.
The Phantom FGR.2 should get its Aim-9Ls so it can actually justify being at 12.0 and the FG.1 should move down to 11.7.

German WW2 lineup and the 8.0 bracket really need some relief (BRs and rank placement). Winrates are absymal on these BR brackets, indicating too high BRs.

Tiger E: GRB 6.0 > 5.7

Tiger H1 GRB 5.7 >5.3

Panther A, G, F GRB 6.0 > 5.7

Tiger II Nr.1-50 GRB 6.7 > 6.3

Zerstörer 45 GRB 6.0 > 5.7

KV-IB GRB 4.3 > 4.0

KW I C 756 (r) GRB 5.0 > 4.7

Leopard 1 GRB 8.0 > 7.7

Sd.Kfz 234/2 move to rank III

StuG III G move rank III

Sd.Kfz.251/21 move to rank III

Pz.IV H / J move rank III

The only one that’s reasonable is the Leopard I and the rank changes.

1 Like

no they are after the jas39c sa(south africa)

Kfir C7 air rb12.0 → 11.7 another completely overtiered plane due to the pythons. 11.7 would also allow for a logical progression from the canard over the kfir c2 (suggested in another comment) to the C7

4 Likes

Kfir C2 Air RB 11.7 → 11.3 would allow for a logical progression down from the C7 to the canard. The C2 is currently completely overtiered for it only having 2 missiles.