Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

cuz US mains stupid

2 Likes

apperently not the F104A/C, mig19s etc either.

RB, F-20A Tigershark, 11.7>12.7 Reason: Very lacklustre armament for the BR and low survivability.

tankers became so stupid that they now cannot even shoot down 1940s plane from ads
image

2 Likes

Fair point but 7.7 seems a bit low

for the char 25t?? it used to be 7.3 when i first started. why it sits at teh same BR now as the AMX30 is beyond me.

3 Likes

Air RB, AMX A-1A. 11.3 > 10 7.
Please take a closer look at the premium AMX. Its bombload and performance are the same as the tech tree one, while the guns are worse 90% of the time and the missiles are arguably worse. While the MAA1 Piranhas have great overload and are all-aspect, the range is much shorter and they have very lttle flare resistence. While AIM 9Ls can reliably ignore poorly dropped flares, the MAA1s will go for any they see. Besides that, a subsonic really suffers at its BR range. We have all aspect missiles as low as 10.3, so while a single BR step drop would be a start, 2 steps to 10.7 wouldnt be too much.

8 Likes

Idk. I just find French annoying when I’m not the France player LMAO

genuinely that means even my 8.0 lineup for britain isnt safe from all aspect missile slinging SPAA xD what will my meteor do against a dang imp

I dont understand the Challanger BRs. Sure their reolad is good but now so is almost all the tanks. Armor wise, they are just as bad as the Abrams, worse firepower then ther T series, worse mobility then the Merkavas. They dont desrve to be at the same BR as other tanks.

1 Like

the char25t at 8.0 is incredibly sad, i still keep it in my lineup but its APHE is absolutely pathetic 209 mm of flat pen, and sure it can flank, but then youre also against MBTs and 9.0 quite often which is more mobile, or equally mobile MBTs with 105mm stablised dart throwing cannons.

2 Likes

GRB-CV90120-11.7<11.3

The CV90120 should stay at where it was at 11.3 it has high mobility, thermals, and a decent round but has no armor. The round would be similar to other rounds at the br and wouldn’t be hard to destroy as it has no armor and there isn’t really any other light tanks at those higher brs.

RB - breda 501 - leave at 4.7
This spg is very mediocre, the turret rotates poorly, there is no armor or survivability against all enemies. now it will fall to such monsters as tiger e, centurion, m109, etc. she is not competitive with them at all and must remain at 4.7.

3 Likes

they literally have 0 armour i was in them earlier today and had a t80U cut clean through the left turret cheek cause he hit the area to where the dorchester meets up and it went clean through n one tapped xd

1 Like

If you die to a sea vixen after the nerfs your either 100% unaware or a vautour ii

1 Like

GRB, PUMA VJTF. 11.0 > 10.3. Spikes ARE NOT OP. And 30mm not OP.

GRB, PUMA. 10.3 > 10.0. 30mm steel not OP. Just don’t break what’s already broken.

6 Likes

ZTZ99A and VT4A1=🤡🤡🤡

4 Likes

in current state puma is 8.7 tank.

1 Like

Not raising the BR for the F-104, F8U2, J-7E, A10C is fucking retarded… and raising planes from 9.3 to 9.7 + lowering the F-5C to 10.7 and not raising the BR for A-10A/A-10A late and SU-25 is to go back to the same problem of aircrafts without flares against all aspect missiles and again being clapped by F-5Cs hordes, it’s complete nonsense.

And to clarify, I have all those planes, basically all USA, USSR, Germany and Japan in planes and much of China, Italy, France and Sweden. I just hate feeling compelled to use OP META just for don’t have to suffer against unbalanced planes that ruin entire BR brackets making it unenjoyable to play different nations and planes.

I don’t give a fuck which nation is “better”, I just want to enjoy playing with each and every one of the vehicles that took me so many hours and mental stability to research.

6 Likes

mb 9.0 or 9.3. But not 10.0+