In your screenshot the T-80B went from 10.3 to 10.7 and the T-80ud went from 10.0 to 10.3 along with the M1’s? What do you mean but not the t80u from wish and the t80b as if everything is being decompressed?
1 Like
Realistic Batlles, Saab J35XS Drakken. 11.0 > 10.7 , can’t battle with other jets in 11.0 because he not have radars.
Max BR 13.7 → 26.3
Gives space for slightly underperforming vehicles to go down and slightly overperforming vehicles to go up.
Most of the current problem vehicles are problems precisely because they are just a bit too weak to go up but stronger than their current BR.
My proposed conversion chart would effectively double the amount of placements for things without radically disrupting the system. Additionally gaps would be quickly filled by adjustments.
Some might argue it would break the lineups a bit, but it is compensated by how full uptier or full downtier would be less overwhelming in terms of capability differences.
2 Likes
T-54 1951 has ~25% winrate on GR SB. No laser rangefinder, no thermal, no stabilizer, no auto reloader and slow.
1 Like
No?
Just because we pride ourselves on enjoyment of the game over realism doesnt mean we dont matter. (Also I can literally face radar missiles on a supersonic airframe in a v a m p i r e, its bullshit.)
2 Likes
M48A2 G A2 (GroundRB) 8.3 → 8.0
The M48A2 G A2 has a big disadvantage at 8.3: No stabilizer.
Almost every other 8.3, even some 8.0 vehicles have a stabilizer, leaving the M48A2 G A2 at a big disadvantage.
It has the DM23 as the top round, but having a high-pen dart is irrelevant if one cannot have first hit with it.
Also the mobility of the tank is not good.
Therefore the M48A2 G A2 shold be lowerded to 8.0, making a nice lineup with the Leopard I, Marder 1A3, DF105, and also being a bit more competitive. If it loses its DM23 in the process, no big deal.
It should then be foldered behind the M48A2 C.
4 Likes
T80 ud has the same armor as t80u, most things at that br struggle to pen the side at an angle. The gnine is a slight nerf sure but that doesn’t justify 10.3 when the abrams and leo with worse armor and equal rounds are at 10.7 (abrams has way worse round)
Winrate is useless as a metric, and you said for all modes.
1 Like
The m1 abrams should get m833 i feel like
4 Likes
Wasnt saying it like that, though i can see how its read, what i was getting at is gaijin doesn’t understand arcade balance. So many vehicles are at crazy high BR’s for literally no reason. Gaijin has shown no interest in taking it seriously. There is a reason the ostwind was 6.7 for a long time in arcade.
1 Like
And why do the F-14s need to go up? Are they getting newer weapons or are players just that terrible they can’t turn slightly to the left or right to dodge a fat phoenix missile? They’re fine where they are at. The F-14B is going to be the same BR as the Su-27? Are you giving it 9Ms to justify that?
The Horten must definitely go down. The accuracy of the guns must be buffed as well as the flight model
This video aptly demonstrates the miserable state the 229 is currently in:
5 Likes
Winrate is literally the dumbest thing since so many noobs ruin a vehicle and are why the winrates suck
1 Like
Ah, okay.
Its really sad that gaijn doesnt take us seriously- blatently OP things get kept while vehicles that are performing fine get moved up (Why is the 234/4 moving up gaijn)
Early jets just needs massive decompression imo, the variance among things there is too much.
Yet we can ignore that it has proper not shaky aiming and heatfs for long distance shooting, also a turret that can loock around to defend itself if the engine gets hit. The 103’s if set on fire are free kills unable to turn or defend themselves if theybare hit in either engine or transmission. Your takes read as thoigh you have only recently gotten to that BR if you think they are OP.
how so? APHE at this br is kinda lame if you’re not flanking concerning the autoloader the object 906 also take 4 sec to realoan so i don’t think it’s so OP.
Mirage 4000 13.3? go play it and you’ll understand that it’s overrated.
1 Like
Exactly, this whole Realstic battles superiority attitude is really played out and pathetic.
Like y’all are acting as if playing Realistic is some sort achievement lmfao. Guess what “superior players” ARB AIN’T HARD, LIKE YOU MAKE IT OUT TO BE. Some of us just find it boring/doesnt fit our style of play.
I for one, enjoy using more than one aircraft in a 15 minute timespan. I mean seriously ARB players need to get over themselves, its a video game, of which ALL GAMEMODES are HIGHLY unrealistic, you are not in 1952 Korea you are sitting your rear end in front of a computer just like me.
2 Likes
Realistic, R2Y2 series. 8.0 → 7.0 Give back air spawn too. Nobody plays this jet. I don’t think I need to tell why but: It’s terribly outclassed by everything in it’s BR I’m not sure why this change was done in the first place. (Apparently good players kept racking up kills) The speed is comparable to all 7.0 jets and the guns aren’t that great either.
Also please stop changing BRs depending on monthly win statistics. Just because good players rack up kills with something doesn’t mean everyone can do the same. This is ruining a lot of vehicles.
3 Likes
Ground Realistic Battles, Medium Tank T95E1, 8.3 > 8.0. I have played 200 games in this tank with the kill to death ratio of 5. This tank should go down because of it’s lacking mobility and firepower. It doesn’t have any kind of gun stabilization unlike other tanks at it’s BR (T-55A), it has a steel dart which is weaker than other darts at the same BR (T-55A), it has a power to weight ratio of 14.5 which is lower than other tanks at the same BR (T-55A which has 16.1).
2 Likes