AB, M60A1 (RISE), 8.3>8.7: it:s not logical having this on the same BR as the M60A1 AOS. It has with APFSDS a much better shell and ERA. Just make it 8.7 like in RB to make it fair. They don’t belong at the same level. Especially since the German M48A2 G A2 exists at the same BR too, but without a stab and ERA compared to it.
Like I said in a post above, 8.0 area is much too compressed.
AB,RB,SB, T-54E1 - 8.0 > 7.7
Reasoning: There’s nothing to give this vehicle an advantage at this level. The Autoloader feature is not enough to allow this vehicle to be 8.0.
seems a bit extreme, especially due to it having a fully stabilized 20mm, it can quite easily decimate vehicles while on a flank, and is obviously not meant to fight heavy tanks head on, which you can evade due to the excellent mobility.
ofc not
Leclerc has too skilled players for Gajub to actually buff it. We have to wait for Gajub to add premium Leclerc for stats to go down so in their “muh statistics” they will see a reason to buff Leclerc to be on par with others.
Simulator, J-8F. 13.0 > 13.3.
Reasoning: As much as I enjoy playing it currently, FOX3 missiles just have no place below 13.3. It is too strong in the 12.0-13.0 bracket. It might be too weak in 13.3-13.7 but that is the fault of compression and 12.0-12.7 should not suffer because of it.
All late A6Ms are hopelessly outclassed at their current battle ratings, relying on enemy players making severe mistakes in order to get any kills due to their lowest-in-class speed, climb rate, and altitude performance.
Since its release the Pantsir has been a bar above every other SPAA vehicle in game, and its BR should reflect this by being a step higher. There are many 10.7 aircraft that can currently face the Pantsir that simply just cannot compete.
There is ZERO reason the IRAF should be at the same BR as the vanilla F-14A, as the Fakour-90s have superior practical range to every missile in game and the R27s perform better than AIM7-Fs at close range.
I suggest giving the IRAF access to the R-73s which it could carry, and if necessary give it a digital RWR since they claimed to upgrade its systems.
Even 12.3 would be totally fine by me. But Leopard 2A5/6 shouldn’t be same BR as 2A7V, and 2A7V shouldn’t be same BR as M1A2, Merkava Mk. 4, Leclerc, etc
J7W1: 6.0 → 5.0, possible addition of Interceptor air spawn
The J7W1 has an extremely poor flight model, which combined with its high weight results in a “fighter” that is extremely unmaneuverable at most speeds, with a horrible climb rate. Its 30mm cannons have also been nerfed severely in recent times, so its firepower is no longer as reliable as it once was.
Its high weight also results in poor acceleration and an unimpressive top speed which is insufficient to outrun many, more maneuverable fighters.
Simulator, Mirage 2000C-S5. 12.3 > 13.0.
Reasoning: It is simply way too OP currently. Comparable plane to the Mig-29G, if not better. It has to go up to 13.0 at least.