Planned Battle Rating Changes for October 2024

AB, M60A1 (RISE), 8.3>8.7: it:s not logical having this on the same BR as the M60A1 AOS. It has with APFSDS a much better shell and ERA. Just make it 8.7 like in RB to make it fair. They don’t belong at the same level. Especially since the German M48A2 G A2 exists at the same BR too, but without a stab and ERA compared to it.

Like I said in a post above, 8.0 area is much too compressed.

3 Likes

Naval - USS Atlanta 5.3->5.7 Too much firepower against destroyers and still decent against Cruisers

10 Likes

AB,RB,SB, T-54E1 - 8.0 > 7.7
Reasoning: There’s nothing to give this vehicle an advantage at this level. The Autoloader feature is not enough to allow this vehicle to be 8.0.

8 Likes

seems a bit extreme, especially due to it having a fully stabilized 20mm, it can quite easily decimate vehicles while on a flank, and is obviously not meant to fight heavy tanks head on, which you can evade due to the excellent mobility.

1 Like

Why would it change? It’s absolutely fine where it’s at.

ofc not
Leclerc has too skilled players for Gajub to actually buff it. We have to wait for Gajub to add premium Leclerc for stats to go down so in their “muh statistics” they will see a reason to buff Leclerc to be on par with others.

6 Likes

Chieftain mk 10 9.3<9.0. Its premium clone, Khalid, has a better engine. Why the increase?

7 Likes

Simulator, J-8F. 13.0 > 13.3.
Reasoning: As much as I enjoy playing it currently, FOX3 missiles just have no place below 13.3. It is too strong in the 12.0-13.0 bracket. It might be too weak in 13.3-13.7 but that is the fault of compression and 12.0-12.7 should not suffer because of it.

8 Likes

RB

A6M3 Model 22 Ko, A6M5, A6M5 Ko: 5.0 → 4.7
A6M5 Otsu: 5.3 → 4.7

All late A6Ms are hopelessly outclassed at their current battle ratings, relying on enemy players making severe mistakes in order to get any kills due to their lowest-in-class speed, climb rate, and altitude performance.

13 Likes

Ground realistic, Pantsir-S1. 11.7 > 12.0.

Since its release the Pantsir has been a bar above every other SPAA vehicle in game, and its BR should reflect this by being a step higher. There are many 10.7 aircraft that can currently face the Pantsir that simply just cannot compete.

83 Likes

I am glad to see Merkavas and Arietes getting reload buffs, as well as many of the new shells;

But 12.0 is insufficient decompression. Ground trees should be decompressed, at the very least, to 12.7; and, ideally, up to 13.0 and even 13.7.

It is also extremely disappointing not to see ANY decompression in naval at all; the most compressed game mode in the entire game.

Why are ships like North Dakota or Dreadnought not even a full BR away from ships like Mutsu, Amagi or Scharnhorst?

29 Likes

ARB, F-14A IRAF. 12.3 > 13.0.

There is ZERO reason the IRAF should be at the same BR as the vanilla F-14A, as the Fakour-90s have superior practical range to every missile in game and the R27s perform better than AIM7-Fs at close range.
I suggest giving the IRAF access to the R-73s which it could carry, and if necessary give it a digital RWR since they claimed to upgrade its systems.

50 Likes

Finally some reasonable change for us french player 👌

4 Likes

Even 12.3 would be totally fine by me. But Leopard 2A5/6 shouldn’t be same BR as 2A7V, and 2A7V shouldn’t be same BR as M1A2, Merkava Mk. 4, Leclerc, etc

16 Likes

J35XS 11.3 → 10.7
It is just a minor upgrade over J35D which sits at 10.3, having flares and 2 more missiles.

52 Likes

RB

J7W1: 6.0 → 5.0, possible addition of Interceptor air spawn

The J7W1 has an extremely poor flight model, which combined with its high weight results in a “fighter” that is extremely unmaneuverable at most speeds, with a horrible climb rate. Its 30mm cannons have also been nerfed severely in recent times, so its firepower is no longer as reliable as it once was.
Its high weight also results in poor acceleration and an unimpressive top speed which is insufficient to outrun many, more maneuverable fighters.

17 Likes

How? It doesn’t have the same radar or A2A lethality as the AV-8B+.

3 Likes

Simulator, Mirage 2000C-S5. 12.3 > 13.0.
Reasoning: It is simply way too OP currently. Comparable plane to the Mig-29G, if not better. It has to go up to 13.0 at least.

5 Likes

One vehicle per comment. Please edit your comment.
If you want to suggest more, please post another comment.

4 Likes

A really good list of changes! None of these are bad!