Yeah, In fact i’ve already got a suggestion in for the opposite:
But the idea of a Mig-21 at 9.0 is just insane, if it goes down then at a minimum the others shoudlnt go up.
1 Like
I agree entirely
Its a super-sonic aircraft with R-77s. It is vastly superior to aircraft like the Sea Harrier FA2 at 13.0 and would absolutely destroy 12.0s like the Tornado F3 or Phantoms. Tornado F3 could barely fight the Mig-29SMT when it only had R-27ERs, let alone R-77s. Mig-29SMT is currently one of the stronger 13.3s and whilst it is quite far behind many 13.7s, it should not move down.
Better solution would be to move most 13.7s up to 14.0
3 Likes
Are we really comparing a fighter to a strike aircraft here?
GRB, STRF 9040C, 10.3 > 10.0.
STRF 9040C isn’t all that crazy. Yes, it gets better armor and round, but also worse mobility and way less ammo it can take. It is NOT on the same level as the BMP-2M, which gets better firerate and ATGMs, aswell as WAY better mobility.
4 Likes
Ok so I get that we are moving everything up, but really do you think we should move Ariete As well? The guy is not interesting in any way and it’s easily the worst MBT in game so why don’t we just leave him where he is 🥺
2 Likes
Sorry, I edited
January 2025 ? Maybe
Air RB, J35D. 10.3 > 10.0.
Before it used to be able to compete on flight performance despite not having countermeasures. After its flight model nerf it’s outclassed and with the planned changes it will be virtually unplayable against the masses of 11.0 & 11.3 planes with high-G rear-aspect IR, all-aspect IR and radar missiles.
3 Likes
Dawg got me emotional about a tank
1 Like
Tank - char 25t (& Amx 50 TO90)
Mode - GRB
Br - from 8.0 to 7.7
The 25t has nothing to do in 8.0 except for his quick reload, but shooting fast without breaking through doesn’t really matter imo.
Now you’re going to think the 25t is made to flank not going up front, but due to his speed and poor acceleration it’s pretty hard to go to great spot when you have contestant way better at his BR (for exemple: DF 105, object 906)
Futehrmore i’ll make a brief comparison between the 25t and the object 906 which is better in every way but still at the same BR, got stabilizater, better speed, even the first amo are better than the one you’ve got at the end of research with the 25t. The two vehicule are made for the same purpose but yet it’s very unbalanced.
To conclude I’ll had that you often get uptier, and I hardly remember the game i really play in 8.0 which is even more unfair. What am I suppose to do against a object 279?
10 Likes
Ground RB, M109G. 6.0 > 6.3.
Currently the M109G and the M109A1 are identical aside from the M109G models being 400kg heavier and varying machine guns, this is not enough to warrant a difference in BR.
2 Likes
GRB Merkava 3B/C 11.0 (Planned 11.3) > 11.0
Merkava 3s have no armor at all, slow speed, and constantly face top tier vehicles like 2A7s and BVMs. Make it easier to play this vehicle, it suffers heavily.
2 Likes
GRB, CV9030 FIN, 9.3 > 9.0.
CV9030 is honestly underwhelming, specifically it’s armament. It’s just NOT on the same level as the Begleit, BMP-3 (9.0 by the way), and other IFVs/light tanks at this BR.
1 Like
Air RB, F-104S.ASA 12.0 > 11.7 / 11.3
Despite having a couple of improvements over the original F-104S models, due to its current BR it is up against machines with much better armament and performance, which can easily negate the Starfighter’s gameplay, especially now that with the upcoming BR changes the plane now has a better chance of encountering machines like the J-11/Su-27 and F-16 than before, Including others with IRCCM missiles that are guaranteed death given the plane’s large heat source.
The F-104S.ASA would be fine in these BRs because despite having access to AIM-9L’s and Aspides, it is still an airframe that cannot sustain a dogfight and has to rely on just intercepting random targets, which is easy to avoid if you pay attention.
13 Likes
Ground Realistic,KV1E KV1B+, from 4.0 to 4.7 cause both are up armored tanks. and have no place to face 3.0 tanks. that have no luck against them. years now people screaming from that… but still no justice… even you bring in the up armored kv1b for Sweden… thats auto br change…
1 Like
How about its a extremely fast (for its BR) super-sonic fighter that can quite happily defeat most aircraft at its BR.
With its triple Gunpods and Aim-9Es its well equipped as well. The lack of CMs might make in vulnerable to aircraft like the Sea Harrier or A-10 with Aim-9ls but its speed means it can stay out of range with ease.
At 10.0 it would be facing aircraft like the Hunter F1 with no CMs, sub-sonic and no AAMs and a fraction of the turn performance. Even at 10.3 it would be broken to try and fend one off in any 9.3 and even at the moment, quite a few 9.7 struggle to fight it.
(and thats just ignoring the fact it does actually have SARH as well and most dont even have RWRs below 9.7)
TLDR: 10.7 is the correct BR.
the good old days when it was at 7.7
1 Like
only problem with that logic is if they shoot youre breach half your crew all die and you now have to repair for 30+ years just to re peak and die.
Don’t forget the KF-41 which is basically a worse PUMA VJTF.
3 Likes
How are the Leclercs and Challengers going up but still have not received a new shell.
These are still not comparable to Abrams/T-series/Strvs/Leopards. they need a new shell considering they are still lacking in this area to be competitive, especially Leclercs with lack of spall liners and weaker shell
3 Likes