Chieftain mk 10 Should stay at 9.0 it has a bad Dart and reload and its mobility is below avarage
1 Like
J-7D airframe and engine is MF. Plus the RWR is dogshit.
1 Like
Air Realistic, F-4C. 10.7 > 10.0. It is worse than the Mirage IIIC (10.0), F-8E (France) (10.0), Shahak (10.0), J35D (10.3), and arguably the Mitsubishi T-2 (9.7) in flight performance and missiles.
2 Likes
Lol no it can be shot down with almost any crowbar and it has low penetration compared to other 9.0 (TAM or Leopard A1A1 and others).
1 Like
Hull-down position with it makes it very good. The APDS it gets spalls a bit better than the dart, while still being able to pen most things. Switch back to the dart if you find it difficult to pen something.
Vehicle: Wyvern S4
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: None
Change: Remove air spawn.
Reason: The Wyvern on paper is not that capable of an A2A fighter, it has a number of limiations that mitgates its few strengths. The one thing it does have is air spawn, which means it can easily intercept many bombers and a large ammo count of 20mm Hispanos enables it shread those targets. Its BR should not change as its equal in overall performance to other airframes at the same BR, but removing air spawn removes its only real advantage and the only reason it is considered “OP”
7 Likes
They don’t get DM33 because they’re already some of the best MBT’s for their BR, everything else surrounding them is also moving up so don’t act as though DM33 is justified because of this BR change.
Stop asking for buffs for vehicles that don’t need any buffs.
3 Likes
Plane - Lim5p/Mig 17 PF
Mode - ARB
BR - 8.7 → 9.0
They are just straight better then the Mig 17 which is already good at 8.7, very good energy generation and retention.
5 Likes
AIR RB. Please, increase the BR cap to 14.0 instead of pushing the F16 down. They will terrorize the lower BR and create BR compression problem again. No one plays the F16 because the kits are inadequate for the BR spread you created but most F16 have the 2nd or 3rd best FM at the BR. Give them some breathing room without destroying the whole BR bracket.
2 Likes
Challenger 3 (TD): 5 second reload.
As of now, it is the only Challenger MBT with a 6 second reload. It has many disadvantages compared to the other Challengers (no turret spall liners, slower than 2E, slower rate of fire) when it is suppossed to be the pinnacle of the British tech tree. Are we suppossed to think a higher raw pen is enough to warrant and make up for all of these disadvantages? And for it to suppossedly be a 122/2A7 counterpart?
Therefore, it should get a 5 second reload, just like every other Challenger, like every Abrams, and now like the Arietes and Merkavas.
11 Likes
Disagree, It only needs to be moved up if the rank 7+ is decompressed as a whole or to 11.7 if it receives python 3 similar to Kfir C.7. It does not have a radar, bad guns and only rear aspect missiles. It is a one trick pony. It thrives on getting missile kills on unaware enemies. I’ve had so many J-7Es chase me and waste their missiles by staying aware and flaring them off. PL-5Bs are only a threat when you fly straight and let enemies get close.
2 Likes
CL-13A MK5 and CL-13B MK.6 also need to be moved up in BR, same with the F4D-1.
Only airframe is same.
The engine is not as good as the SMT model, but much better than the MF.
Which is identical as MiG-21MF/SMT or even MiG-21bis, MiG-23s except MLD model.
1 Like
plane- XP-50
mode- air rb
BR- 4.0 → 4.3
the aircraft needs no introduction, the plane is over performing at the br it sits at right now
8 Likes
I’d like to make a suggestion for the f4j phantom.
It makes 0 sense to leave it at 12.0 when the EJs get to go down, but not it! the only advantage it has is HMD, and that’s at the loss of src PD, and the eagle flaps that the EJs get. it has no dogfighting capability, and the radar is very easy to notch, so it’s pretty much only good at killing noobies in their premiums. Please lower it to 11.7 if not 11.3! Hardly anyone plays the thing right now, after this when it’s fighting SU-27s!!! NO ONE will play it.
Realistic, Harrier GR.1. 9.0>9.7. while the initial release of the GR.1 was commonly seen as overpowered, after countless nerfs to the GR1’s main armament, (SRAAM), and newer aircraft being added to the game, the GR1 is unplayable, the SRAAMs fail to track countless times against the opposition, as well as this the GR1 must face against supersonic aircraft which make the GR1 such an easy target, compared to its American export, which has 2 9Gs which are amazing, it also carries 240x countermeasures.
The GR1 used to be a force to be reckoned with, but now it is outclassed and utterly hopeless to play in realistic, to fix this aircraft, the SRAAM performance should be reviewed and compared against other vehicles weaponry at its current BR to at least give it a fighting chance if it does stay at its current BR possibly even with the addition of countermeasures to at least have some survivability chance against the missiles it will be up against.
2 Likes
9.3 sure, 9.0 is what I’m not too sure about. The Yak-38 is on the same boat, and the SRAAMs are honestly a better close-range monster than the R-60s.
Disagree. It needs to only go up if rank 7+ is decompressed further or to 11.7 with Python 3s like Kfir C.7. A good flight model can only help a plane so much. Having rear-aspect only missiles when planes with more missiles and all aspect seekers having a lower BR does not make any sense.
1 Like
Air Realistic, F-104S. ASA. 12.0 > 11.3. It has a worse flight model than the Tornado F3 (12.0) but much worse missile loadout. Cannot carry Aspides (AIM-7E2s) without sacrificing gun and 2 missile pylons. Radar is much worse than the Tornado F3. It has no directional RWR so it has no way of effectively notching against active radar missiles or even semiactive radar missiles. Even if it did have a directional RWR, it cannot effectively turn fast enough to get 90 degrees and notch before the missile hits. Lacks maneuverability to hug the terrain and multipath.
5 Likes
How do I 💖 this twice?
1 Like