It’s fine. I love the thing. It’s quite balanced.
AB, Merkava Mk.2D, 9.7 > 9.3, cause it’s almost identical to Merkava MK.2B!
4 Likes
When gaijin finally does a wheeled vehicle update and focus on adding wheeled vehicles to nations that only have like 1 or no TT wheeled tanks that would be amazing. Though i want my Lav 105
No changes to air SIM BRs? They are urgently needed and were also skipped the last round. I read this in way that you are planning to shut down the whole game mode. I will not be selling WT to DCS pilots any more. I just mentioned the upcoming sales to some.
1 Like
RB, Object 279. 8.7>9.0. Reason: The Object 279 really starts lacking when meeting a full 10.0 uptier with the APHE round being prone to catch volumetric armor and thus being rendered ineffective. Additional factors are a lack of Mobility, compared to other vehicles on this BR ranges, as well as its lack of features such as Thermals, APS, ERA etc. It needs to get away from 10.0, preferably the BR should be fixed to 8.7-8.3 only.
They should give it all aspect and move its rating up to whatever. It’s my second most played vehicle and is amazing vs unaware opponents but is frustrating vs opponents who are aware and flare because you don’t have radar missiles to force the guy you’re chasing to turn. All aspect would allow last second surprise shots in a headon.
Ofcourse not, but its not bad by far.
yeah if the j7E and J7D stay at 11.0 move the canard and XS down to 10.7, i agree
1 Like
yeah of course it’s higher. the 551 get’s what is essentially TOW-2 while the M113 TOW gets I-TOW max
please move the f8 up
3 Likes
In this table,arcade ground force br change is wrong.
Such as TAM2C CV90105 Rooikat,the original br is 9.7 9.0.
2 Likes
Good to know. I’ve had F-4C unlocked for about a year, but it was bumped to 10.7 right before I intended to try to spade it, so it has sat unused, and I haven’t looked through its skins.
Air realistic battles, F8U2 needs to be moved up after completely destroying the 9.0-10.0 area please.
5 Likes
Yes which is why they randomly decided to nerf and unnerf the Leclerc entirely because they decided to do so.
If J-7E gets PL-8s, it would be 12.0 that is same BR with Kfir C.7
2 Likes
2A5 still being the same BR as the 2A6, PSO and 2A7 is a joke
2 Likes
Go through and upvote all the other posters who have listed this too!
1 Like
The ZSU is useless at 7.7 because there’s the Yenisei there and you erase the 7.3 filler gap.
So it’s not a “either the 163 goes to 7.3 or the 23-4M2 goes to 7.7”
The 163 goes to 7.3,stop.
1.5km lock-on range with 2° of FoV,meaning you need to be on the Gunner Sight to make the best of it
1 Like
The additional armor doesnt meant that much yeah
Not entirely, autoloader is entire up to gaijin, the Strv 103’s can reload in 3.0 if set to that at the cost of decreasing the life span of the loader. Same with the CT-CV 105HP which Cockerill has stated was only tested at 7.5-8.5 secs though it had the ability to reload in about 5 seconds if the army wanted to focus on fire rate over the autoloaders lifespan.
The reload on the CT was denied for balance
2 Likes