How is 6 aim-9Ps a poor armament, forget about 750 rounds of vulcan cannon. It will be more playable when F8u-2 goes up trust.
I have a 2.5 KDR in it and i just spaded it, so some of that was without 6 Aim-9Ps.
What about the J35A? Its 9.7 with 4 aim 9B? This isnt the right choice, rather air need to increase in BR’s as 8.x vehicle dont deserve to get murdered by 20g missiles.
You might want to reply to the guy arguging for it to go down BR then, I think its fine at 10.3.
Idk for GRB i could see them being pretty hard to deal with for the current CAS jets
Reply to the relevent post pls, I dont know which one you are talking about.
Plane - MIG-9
Mode - ARB
BR - 7.3 → 7.0
Currently it is just a far worse MIG-9(L), its abilty/FM is simmlar to most other 7.0s in the game currently, also would give people a reason to play it.
3 Likes
Realistic, AGS. 11.0 >11.3, add M900, because M833 in this BR is really a joke which make this vehicle in an awkward situation
1 Like
Ground RB, T54E1. 8.0<7.7. Here is my reasoning, there is no lineup for 8.0 America. When ya move the majority of 8.0 American tanks to 8.3, ya destroyed it. The only other 8.0 American tank is the m60 but who plays 8.0 anymore for USA? This tank is equivalent to some of the French autoloaders, only main difference is the heatfs and apds.
I would heavliy consider bring this tank down or in my next suggestion, the T95e1.
1 Like
You don’t need speed when you have an Aim-9m
Difference in thermals is 2s38 is gen 2.5
Hstvl is gen 1
Realistically there isn’t much difference because they’re meant for acquisition more so than firing, unless it’s night time.
Ground RB, T95e1. 8.3<8.0. There is no reason why this tank went to 8.3. If the reasoning this tank went to 8.3 was because of it’s apfsds round, I’m sorry but that is stupid. The apfsds round has a max of 293mm of penn point blank, which 9/10 times you’re not going have a chance to do. This tank shouldn’t be seeing mbts at the 9.3 area, hell even some at the 8.7-9.0 area frequently. Mind you, this tank also has the massive cupola weak spot where it gets overpressure.
1 Like
Ground RB, 120s. Stays at 10.0. Yes, it’s a m1a1 turret. Yes, it has a very strong round. But so does a lot of mbts around this br. Also, IT’S ON A PATTON CHASSIS. The turret ring is more of a weak spot due to being on the patton chassis, it’s slow, and still gets one shot through the hull. No reason why this tank is going to 10.3. It should stay at 10.0.
1 Like
Pz4 armor, short 88, mediocre mobility
Honestly could even see it at 4.7
1 Like
Arcade, Pz.IV H . 4.0 > 4.7. Standoff armor offers potent defense against HEAT shells that Flanking tanks often rely upon This plus a potent APHE shell make it very formidable. Comparable stat-wise to Sherman IC, which sits at 4.7
Arcade, Chi-Ha Short Gun. 2.0>2.7. Just a crazy big shell with a ton of HE for its BR. Comparable to Chi-Ha LG, which sits at 2.7
Arcade, SU-76M. 2.0>2.3. BR-350B shells are really good, the tanks is really good at sniping. placement of exterior fuel tanks and engine make it hard for enemies to hit ammo or gunner crew, giving it good survivability against AP and smaller APHE
Realistic, Type 63 6.3 > 6.0 this vehicle is pretty bad, it’s only carried by a decent heat shell and pretty much nothing else. It’s an unstabilized PT-76 with a longer reload but better pen for the HEATFS shell, and also an entire BR higher. Compared to other HEAT slingers it really isn’t good.
3 Likes
realistic Kfir C.7 12.0 > 11.7, outclassed and suffering both as airframe, meta around radar missiles, lack of effective # countermeasures, and disasterous stock grind with aim9D and shafrir 2
1 Like
Should be 11.3 with the lack of countermeasures and advanced electronics.
Ground RB, Antelope. 10.3 → 9.3. The Antelope has a disappointing performance, both on the missile and on the launch platform, the TC-1L low count and poor seeker (low all-aspect lock range and poor IRCCM) makes the Antelope a undesired choice between it, the PGZ04A and the PGZ09.
3 Likes