Shenyang F-5 : Well well well time passed and everything changed but I am still at 9.3 as a Mig-17
9 Likes
In what way?
Armor is only about as good as a 2A7V, and is much easier to kill once penned. Otherwise it’s worse in almost every way compared to 2A7V.
6 Likes
We dig through topic, like previously. But with new rule (one comment, one vehicle) it will be much easier.
It will be also easier for other players to support your suggestion.
2 Likes
F-14B going up a BR , should get 22G for AIM-54Cs as dev acknowlege the fact it uses dual plane axises for turning, dual plane axises is not modeled in game, but at least give it the performance
7 Likes
122b+ basically have the same armor as 122a and b tough? the only different is side composite
if that is a reason for different br between a an b+ then do 2a5PSO should be higher than 2a5?
strange an ariete buff
Yo Stona
How can we effectively comment on this change without a practical idea of what the recalculation effects? (and is it being done to the Warrior, which uses the same gun and the same rounds, too?)
13 Likes
And reduced smoke motors
1 Like
Just a heads up guys as a lot of you are duplicating. If you see someone who has already posted the vehicle you want to suggest also, please upvote the post. It’s a better way of showing support / agreement than a seperate post with the same suggestion if likes are not used.
32 Likes
I agree it’s the weaker of the group of 2A7V, 2A7HU and 122B+ but nonetheless it is still very dominant.
1 Like
GRB. Otomatic. 11.3 > 10.3. Has been overtiered for YEARS. Its nearest competitor is the 2S38, which is superior in almost every way. Or, give the Otomatic more apfsds ammunition.
35 Likes
B+ composite likes to bounce darts due to volumetric shenanigans and has a better transmission making it faster than even the 2A7V
RB
Ki-61-I Hei: 4.7 → 4.0
It has the same flight performance as the Ki-61-I Ko at 3.3, but much higher BR. So much so that it is at the same BR as its replacement and upgrade, the Ki-61-II. Everything about this fighter except armament is lacking.
9 Likes
Ground RB, MEPHISTO 8.7 → 9.0
MEPHISTO have superior mobility than the AFT-09, beside that they’re really similar platforms. It could get HOT-3 which it historically carried and go to 9.0 (Same BR as AFT-09)where it could support higher BR lineups better, which at the moment lack support vehicles completely.
31 Likes
To be fair the thread is moving very fast, I mean look at this:
7 Likes
@Stona_WT
Sorry for the ping but i can’t see any reply to this in this topic
Can we get more information on the Fox APDS changes? (This would also effect the Warrior, Falcon and AMX-30DCA)
i just hope its not a sharp nerf
(Edit: Noticed i had missed a bracket)
13 Likes
GRB, Leopard 2A4M CAN, 11.7
If it’s going up in BR than it should get its spall liners (Community Bug Reporting System) and DM53.
12 Likes
2A5 PSO could also be included, but to my knowledge it’s not as dominant at top-tier. As far as I understand it has weaker armour than the 122B+, no? Correct me if I’m wrong or make a separate comment for it
1 Like
Air RB: Sea Harrier FRS.1 11.3 > 11.0
Reasoning - Multiple supersonic, SARH and some with all aspect IR platforms are going to be made 11.0 BR (eg F4 phantoms, mig 23s), which is below that of the SHAR FRS.1 which is a subsonic plane with limited gun/dogfight capability on BR and only 4 aim9Ls and limited strike dumb weapons.
20 Likes
i never notice it, for me all 3 is the same performance wise