Vehicle in question: Z-9WA
BR: 10.7>10.7 GRB
TY-90s has been nerfed multiple times. The vehicle already lacks a proper RWR, and an adequate AGM - it should not be superior to other 10.3, now 10.7 helicopters.
Vehicle in question: Z-9WA
BR: 10.7>10.7 GRB
TY-90s has been nerfed multiple times. The vehicle already lacks a proper RWR, and an adequate AGM - it should not be superior to other 10.3, now 10.7 helicopters.
Air RB P-51H-5-NA 6.3-> 6.7 It does not matte that much since BR is focus on 6.0 and 7.0 but with Spitfire Mk 22 and 24 move to 6.7 and 6.3 P-51H should be comparable to spitfire Mk 24 and hence a 6.7 BR
yeah, 12000lbs is 5.3, so 5000kg won’t have a too low br
They’re already deserving of a BR step up with it’s current loadout, very much so. You’re saying a separate massive change/improvement in missiles (to the already great Fakour/Phoenix) doesn’t constitute any change in BR whatsoever?
Compression is as trash as it can be keep that in mind, but do you really want F-14s to still dominate 11.3 and 11.7 downtiers
Air & Ground Realistic
Spitfire Mk 22
6.7 → 6.3
The Mk 24 as it currently stands, is at a good BR, however the performance Between the Mk 22 and Mk 24 is so big that the Mk 22 should be moved down one BR bracket.
Ground realistic, Ajs-37 10.7 → 10.3.
Reason: It can only carry 3 agm65a and 2 aim9j’s with countermeasures. Compare this with the Ayit, A7d, Buccaneer S.2B and Hunter f.58 and you see that the Ajs-37 loudout is lacking. Other planes can carry more ordnance/bettter at a lower br. Only pro of the Ajs-37 is speed.
So now France has a 3.3 br gap at top tier , way to go Gaijin
Air RB
F8U-2 10.0 → 10.3 or maybe 10.7
I have no idea why nobody talking about this broken OP.
Since wing ripping system was changed, F8U-2 is pretty cracked now.
Spam x4 AIM-9Ds, have CMs, pretty decent flight models.
ARB
F2G-1
6.0>6.3
high speed, while also being very good at lower speeds, good guns
I mean, the situation of the Leclercs is at least not getting any worse. They were already fighting top-tier tanks anyway, so that’s not changing.
The Arietes are also moving up in BR. I don’t have Italian top tier but I can definitely say the Leclercs are not suffering as much as those tanks lol
6.8s is not enough at all. The loading time of T-80 should be upgraded to 6s, and the loading time of ZTZ99 and T-90 should be upgraded to 6.6s
Kfir C.2 11.7 → 11.3
It’s the same jet as Kfir Canard, but with 2 all-aspect missiles
This shouldn’t move due to loadout but due to current modeling issues/placeholder parts it needs to
Vehicle: Sea Harrier FA2
Gamemode: Air Realistic & Air Sim
BR Change: 13.0 —> 12.7
Reason: The Sea Harrier FA2 has the same flight performance as the 9.7 Harriers but with a better engine. It is carried at its BR by the Blue Vixen Radar and AMRAAM. It should be fine at its current BR despite that fact, but has so many missing features and issues, that this simply isnt the case.
Prefered solution: Fix the Sea Harrier FA2
M1A2 SEP/SEP V2. Keep at 12.0, but give it M829A3.
Air RB, A-10C 11.3 > 11.7/12.0
4 x Aim 9M’s at such a low BR is insanely effective if used well, combined with a good gun and manouverability + tons of flares
Air RB, Kfir Canard. 11.3 > 11.0
It only has to Sidewinders, a poor RWR, a low amount of CMs, and no radar or radar slaving. Its really suffering at its BR currently, just like the J-35XS.
Dont forget HMD slaving
Lol, just about to write this right now
It’s literally F16 ADF, with slightly worse flight model. It’s correct that it’s the same br alongside F16 ADF