Interesting idea but ec maps don’t have it but it won’t help on those any way
Would it not make sense to increase make Air BR to 15? Then give planes some breathing room.
Also Wyvern needs to be BR 4.7 or have its air spawn removed. Its speed, 3 x 1000 pound bombs and 4 20mm with 800 rounds has ruined 4.0 battles. And it you’re then up tiered into the Wyvern spam its just not very fun
1 Like
6.3 only makes sense. A lot of vehicles moved up while the T20 didn’t.
Now it’s back being above the Tiger and Panthers and 7.3 has nothing that the T20 didn’t face before 5.0-7.7 vehicles were moved up.
Mobility also improved so it’s the same but slightly better.
I’m not worried in the slightest about the T20s performance at 6.3.
1 Like
Yak-141 should be removed from the game. If they can’t give the Abrams “prototype” DU armor, then Russia doesn’t need a prototype plane.
2 Likes
well congrats on absolutely killing the french tree and killing 2 of 6 good japanese vehicles thanks gaijin <3
1 Like
Yep, its a good half way point between full airspawn and normal AF spawn. Shame it doesnt get used as much
Honestly, I’m against the changes. Not enough good in the proposed adjustments. France is getting screwed over hard, Japan’s not looking great either. Minor nations seem fairly pointless to play with these changes. The Sim adjustments are fine but everything is a collective no for me.
4 Likes
or move american ones to 11.7 since they have AIM-7F and hmd
Ariete PSO RB [11.3 → 11.0], while we are still waiting for protection revision and spall liners addition for the whole Ariete family, this tank won’t be much better in any case. After the weight parameters fix (without changes of protection at least for add-on armor kits) Ariete PSO weights 57 t stock and 59 t with PSO tipo 2 installed.
The protection of this tank is on 10.7 level at max (actually it can go to this br if you remove DM53 imo).
2 Likes
These two things don’t correlate
Identical radar as far as I am aware. Only difference is the differernt engines
They do. Apples and oranges are still both fruit. You can’t make the rationale “we can’t give the Abrams DU armor because it only went into 5 prototypes but here’s a prototype plane that was never fitted with a radar, RWR, and missiles but is getting them anyway”. And then make the point of giving them R-73s and R-77s (not you but others have). Apply it universally or don’t.
2 Likes
Very glad 12.7 for air is now a thing, but T20 to 6.3??? its a slightly smaller M4A3 with slightly better reverse gears. It has no armour and only a 76mm cannon.
3 Likes
I hope we will also see some changes for M735 so tanks that use that round can be playable. Cheers !
Compared with F5E, J7E has more missiles, better maneuverability, faster speed, and better engine. It is very unfair for J7E and F5E to be placed in the same room.
You already have the flight performance of a 10.3 at 9.7. Sure learning the gsh 23 is a bit hard at first but you can be an absolute menace with it
I have a question: Why does the CL 13B mk6 have the same br as the f104A and C? Why does the CL 13B mk6 have to face A10, SU25 or F4C? Is that balance? It is necessary to rethink the br of most airplanes that are between 8.3 and 10.3.
1 Like
True if it is going up, it should be given better thermal sight. Gen 1 thermal sights are terrible.
Oops, looks like you’re right. The AN/AWG-11 (FG) and 12 (FGR) were upgrades over the AN/AWG-10 (J) in serviceability and ground attack, not interception as I thought. I will make the correction.
2 Likes
I still don’t see the connection, the aircraft’s systems existed and were ready for the aircraft’s production line, and there’s picture evidence of the aircraft with those weapons (R-77 & R-73).