The Su-25BM has an internal gun. The thing with the BM is that its a legacy Su-25 airframe boasting the legacy engines
it should stay 6.7 and then the II H goes to 7.0.
easy fix : )
mig23BN (all modes) br 9.7 → 9.7
change: give it ability to carry 2 R-13Ms
(RB) ICV (P) 9.7 > 9.0
-Everything about this vehicle is bad, the Type 16 base does not give good mobility, so often ICV is behind its team. Huge dimensions of the vehicle do not allow to hide it or find a normal shelter, and any hit in the hull makes the vehicle incapacitated, as the organs of removal are knocked out, and any hit in the turret leads to death blow up the ammo, that is, having seemingly good chances for survivability, ICV it does not have it from the word at all. And most importantly Bushmaster, the most terrible autocannon in the game, you can spend half a belt at point-blank range in the side of the MBT and still not do him any damage, and there is simply no other weapon, there is no normal damage, penetration is extremely random, low rate of fire, so also the spread is large, the technique with such a gun in no way can not be on 9.7
You need to give a reason. Read the suggestions rules.
On the PGZ09 they are, because the fire rate is so high you can saturate a large area. And they are a large calibre than the ones on the Puma.
SRAAMs fixes are more about historical accuracy. They should have twice their current range and are really buggy when fired at close ranges. Those are the minimum that need to be fixed. All-aspect would be fun, but impossible to balance on the current airframes.
B6N2
Air RB (and Ground RB)
2.0 > 2.3
It’s a B6N2a with weaker defensive weapons at the same BR. While it could be problematic in the sense that it could outspeed biplanes, it also doesn’t have much of a reason to have to deal with 3.3 planes. Plus, for lineups, Japan only has the D4Y1 and Ki 109 at 2.0, so the B6N2 could provide another option to that bracket. Not to mention, it makes the progression between the Tenzan variants smoother, going from the B6N1 at 1.7, to the B6N2 at 2.0, and ending with the B6N2a at 2.3.
Leo A1A1 9.0 → 8.7. No LRF, no survivability, no TVD, ok mobility. It has no business being at 9.0, compared to what else is sitting on that BR
F-16A OCU (Thai) 13.7 → 13.0 (with removed AMRAAM)
The aircraft was unable to carry the AMRAAM, which is already reported. In game they work together with a bunch of other issues like missing countermeasures and air to ground armaments (also reported) to make this aircraft one of the worst 13.7 fighters in the game.
With the removal of AMRAAM it would be a solid 13.0 IRCCM Fox 2 option akin to the Belgian F-16A, while also being closer to the historical aircraft it’s trying to represent.
It has wayyy less countermeasures.
Swedish t80u down to 10.3
I dont think it does? BM lacks the IRCCM Module on the tail and still uses the engines of the 25/25K. its only real upgrade is the R73.
at 11.0 it will be fine. its an easy kill where it is right now (along with all the slow attackers)
ZiS-43 GRB 3.0 > 2.7
Of all USSR low tier SPAA this one I’ve seen the least. As in, I struggle to remember encountering it during the previous year, ever. I strongly suspect that this change is a result of selection bias due to a minority of players only spawning it in specific situations, and moving it up will just cause the vehicle to disappear altogether, never to see light of the day again, especially since there’s no USSR 3.0 lineup.
Vehicle: 2S6
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 10/7 —> 11.0
Reason: It is by far the strongest SPAA at 10.7 and no other 10.7 SPAA even comes close to its performance. Ideally, it needs to move up much further than 11.0. But with the current compression. 11.0 is as high as it can go.
Mystere IV ARB 8.7→ 8.3
Mystere IV has a poor energy,Gaijin moved mig15 and sabres to 8.3 but the Mystere seems been forgotten,it has powerful DEFA cannons but flight perform is quite not good
Vehicle: F9F-2 panther
Gamemode: Air RB
BR change: 8.0 → 7.7
Reason: Same TWR with F2H in 7.3, inferior energy, speed, turn compared to other 8.0 aircrafts. Same BR with F9F-5 with better engine and speed, and F9F-5 has same BR with MIG-15 and F-86A which is better in every ways.
It’s fine as is, definitely not 9.0 material at all.
These brs seems cool but once again event vehicles are ignored.
The 0.7 br difference between Is-7 and Obj 279 is ridiculous. It should be 0.3 for the stab difference. So:
IS-7 8.3–>8.7 his armor still strong and has a powerful gun with a strong shell and a very good mobility.
Or (if IS-7 isn’t changed)
Object 279 9.0 —> 8.7 because of his lack of armor (always fight APDS and APFSDS) and also suffer from being to large and 4 tracks making it easely to immobilize.
0.3 br difference should be the good one.
Thank you.
Simulator battles, SU-27. 13.3>13.0
No digital rwr in pair with slow radar =awfull sensor awareness + It was already playing against F-15A and Grippens and it was not imbalanced in Sim.