yeah you can, remove r27er and replace r60m with r73 while also limiting the 9.12/9.13 to 4 r73 so you’re forced to use either 4x r73 and 2x r27r or 4x r73 and 2x r27t
1 Like
But I can also bring up the merkavas, leclercs, etc that are worse too? you’re just asking for compression, 2a5 is also just strictly better than every 11.3-11.7 mbt that already exists
what u mean, most of eurofighters functions are still bugged,
every aircraft above 13.0 would need to go further up
Better Idea,
max BR 14.0 for Ground
2 Likes
Thanks man! ^^
I remember asking a similar question a year or two ago but got no answer back then :P
Vehicle - ZTZ96
Mode - GAB/GRB
BR - 9.3 ->9.7
Much like the Base T72s, if someone uses bushes good luck killing it with 95% of rounds it faces frontly,. Currently the same BR as much worse tanks as the M48 super, Strv 105 , CM11, T64A.
4 Likes
Forget about it. Vixen has better performance and better missiles than many 9.3
That’s all low tier helis. That being 8.7 was kinda crazy tbh.
Did I say that? Did I? I did not. Don’t strawman my point. The performance gap between supersonics and subsonics is much greater than between that of the best subsonics compared to the average subsonic aircraft.
I don’t understand what you mean by this. I said everything should go up, not down. Did you read my post? Or are you just trying to mis contrude my argument on purpose?
I’m talking about everything else besides those two aircraft. The F-15E and EF completely dance on everything below them at the moment. My bad for wording it a bit badly. But I feel you misunderstood it on purpose. I will edit to clarify either way.
This is a problem Gaijin crafted for themselves in all fairness, with their decision making regarding the MiG-29 to begin with.
Please don’t argue in bad faith. It makes you look stupid.
What makes the F-14B any different? The Iranian Tomcats Fakour90s and R27s are much better than the F-14B AIM54Cs and AIM7Ms. The 54Cs feel so slow compared to the Fakour90s, and the R27s pull harder than the 7Ms.
Its easier to say you want to just get easy kills on 12.0 planes.
Game Mode: Ground (All)
Vehicle: M18 GMC (all Countries)
BR: 6.0 > 5.7
Reason: Echoing what some others I’ve seen have said, it’s BR is a bit too high. The Chinese and US tech don’t have a solid 6.0 tank line up. In full uptiers it has to go against T-44 100s and ATGM vehicles.
2 Likes
Amazing how the USA 6.7 - 7.0 lineup gets passed again
So? it has zero guns. Its missiles are easily defeated by flares. It is very limited in niche.
because its fine
People complained about the F-14B, and it got moved.
1 Like
Ground Realistic Battles, American T34. 6.7 > 7.0.
The American T34 is a solid heavy tank with 280mm pen. It can penetrate almost any tank at its BR, even a Jagdtiger from the front. The side head armour is 150mm thick and its curved. Tanks like the T 34 85, can’t even penetrate it from the side head.
3 Likes
That’s a pretty good joke.
DM me if you want to talk about it
I don’t agree with this either (at least without proper decompression coming with it) but at least there’s finally somebody talking about the the T34 and not just the Tiger 2H
1 Like
Game Mode: Ground (All)
Vehicle: T34 (USA)
BR: 6.7 > 7.0 (or above)
Reason: It’s a bit overpowered, being well armored and having really high pen solid shots. In full downtiers, it can go against 5.7 tanks like the Tiger E and Soviet T-34 which is quite unfair.
9 Likes