Honestly I disagree, the TTD is a sidegrade (better shell and thermals but worse reload and mobility) and is alright at 10.3, unless both move to 10.0 which I would be ok with.
Leave them with something. Jesus. Israel’s tech tree is getting way too many player statistic nerfs.
1 Like
Mode: Air Simulator Battles
Vehicle: Su-11
BR: 7.0 → 7.7
Reasoning: The Su-11’s flight performance exceeds that of everything at its BR by an absurd margin. It has a much higher top speed as well as much greater acceleration (as an example, it’s thrust-to-weight ratio is nearly 1.5x higher than the F-80A). Combine that with quite good energy retention and you have a plane that is functionally untouchable at its current BR. At 7.7 it would face much more comparable aircraft while still having advantages over most of them.
6 Likes
Yes exactly, it was already arguably overtiered at 9.7 and now it’s 10.3, totally comical
Give IRIS-T the proper seeker, it’s IIR not IR
currently it is locking onto AGMs fired by planes and losing track despite DL
edit: You can see me literally ignoring the IRIS-T as I’m firing my mavericks
The F-15J(M) is moving up to 14.0
edit - only in arcade, my bad
1 Like
arcade
2 Likes
didnt even let me finish my edit, you are a vulture 😭 /j
3 Likes
Mode: Air Simulator Battles
Vehicle: Ayit (A-4N)
BR: 9.7 → 10.0
Reasoning: At 9.7 it has some of the best missiles even as high as 10.7 or 11.0 while facing almost exclusively flareless aircraft armed with (at best in most cases) AIM-9Es, while the Ayit itself has a healthy supply of countermeasures. Additionally, it has a very solid flight model even compared to the vast majority of the fighters at its BR (MiG-19 excluded) and excellent avionics. On top of this, it’s an attacker that can carry 2 of its fantastic missiles for defense while also carrying 5 guided munitions for ground attack, making it easily the best attacker in its bracket. At 10.0 it would still be an excellent aircraft, but significantly more in line with other attackers.
2 Likes
RWR will never make me use that damn thing. It can’t detect anything.
I made a comment similar to this above.
I proposed F-15J(M) to 14.0 ONLY if it received its IRST and MAWS. This would just make it an F-15E/I sidegrade, being a better close range F-15 equivalent.
1 Like
TAM 9.0 > 9.3
Among the most prolific and flexible light tanks in the game, and above everything similar at 9.0 If needed, supply it with DM33 to increase its BR, or reclassify it as a medium tank to justify keeping it at 9.0 Leaving it like this is criminally overpowered
4 Likes
F-14A IRAIF to 13.3 if it receives its R-73s. Its fine where it is at 13.0 without R-73s.
Right, but you forgot that even if the vehicle become useless, good player will still perform well enough with it.
It can’t even get R-73s lmao
Worse radar, No IRCCM, no HMD, 45 CM. Yeah, it can stay at 13.3.
1 Like
Or better yet, just remove the AMRAAMS and let it stay at 13.0 then.
this supposed counterpoint makes no sense whatsoever. You’re accusing the F-15E to be strong with energy while being a brick, but the Su-30 supposedly suffers from lacking energy and not being maneuverable.
However, you’re conveniently skipping the missile discussion, whereas the Su-30 has stronger choices on AGMs and —marginally— (albeit better enough imho) air to air missiles.
The supposed logic of this asymmetrical balancing is that the F-15E, while carrying less missiles, should be more effective at air-to-air than the Su-30, when clearly the AIM-120 series haven’t been that dominant ever since the balancing patch of seek and destroy, where it got butchered in the HOBS department.
So far i’ve been capable to pull 5 frags consistently with the R-77-1 loadout, while having a hard time nailing a 120 kill with the 15J(M) at all.
1 Like
no TWS either
I remember seeing a clip of it firing R-73s in a one-time test, but I can’t find it. I might be schizophrenic
1 Like