Gun handling on Type 90’s is far worse than on Leo’s (i played with both, i know what i say)
Sights are off on those things, not like on Leo’s or Abrams
So NO… Type 90’s don’t deserve 11.7, if you say it from perspective of person who plays against them, then maybe they deserve, but playing with them is not that easy. Just because they have 4s reload it doesn’t mean they should go even higher.
3 Likes
no it doesnt. sounds like a skill issue tbh lmao. learn to hit weakspots and the pen difference is negligible
Warthunder lied to me it was Arcade mode stats but it has more horse power compared to the standar 8.3 t-55 
Vs 
keep in mind there without mods so the diffirence will be bigger when spaded
It isn’t exactly the same but it’s close enough, For a tank in 8.7 it has comperable armor to a version of the same vehicle but 9.0 it has a better shell has a ATGM laucher it’s lighter by two tons if the T-55AMD can go in 9.0 so can it
How can you say that when the British F-4 and the MiG-23ML(D) are in 11.3, and the MiG-23M is in 11.0?
The F1C are effective against those, but they aren’t overpowered.
The R24T and R have no equivalent, and the F-4’s carrying capacity is unmatched.
1 Like
Why do you keep Nerfing Israeli vehicles like the Namer while the BMP-2M and 2S38 are left to stay where they are?
You keep saying that other vehicles outperform the 2S38, which is obvious; haven’t you learned the lesson that Premium players play worse than those who grinded their tech tree? Average Player Performance does not balance well with Premiums. We learned this with the WMA ages ago.
The CV9040 series is good, but it lacks much of what the 2S38 has. This disparity in balance is outrageous, and now the Mk.2D is going to be 10.3? How in the actual hell is that considered slightly inferior to the Leopard 2A4?
What is your aim here, Gaijin?
3 Likes
Mode: Air Simulator Battles
Vehicle: Ju 288C
BR Change: 6.0 → 7.0
While being the size of a light or medium bomber, the Ju 288 has speed and acceleration comparable to fighters and maneuverability comparable to attackers. It also has a dangerous defensive armament and the payload capacity of a heavy bomber. Between these factors, they are largely immune to interception. For a bomber with similar speed, you have to go up to 7.0 for the B-29, one of the least maneuverable aircraft in the game. Being at the same BR as the B-29 (7.0) would still leave it as an effective bomber, while still having a speed differential with fighters that means it can’t simply force a low-closer tail chase that all but guarantees that the pursuing fighter is doomed.
2 Likes
ARB F-4F (early) 10.7 > 10.0
It has effectively the same armament as the Mitsubishi F-1 (1 20mm Vulcan + 4 20G AIM-9s) and it does NOT have flares too. At 10.0 there would still be mostly missile you can not dodge, but at least there are less all-aspect ones.
1 Like
does not have TWS, as far as we know it does not get better IR missiles
The F-4F is a significantly better fighter than the F-1. The F-1 is slower, and bleeds speed incredibly quickly compared to the F-4.
no, it is significantly outperformed by every other 14.0 (besides F-18)
that I agree with
If you are going to up the BR of the AGS then at least give it a better shell. Honestly it will Suffer a bunch if nothing is added.
the PT-16’/T14 mod. should NOT be up BR’ed to 11.0 that will be horrible. it is good yes. But it is Super Light. literally no Armor it already gets shred to pieces by any auto cannon. Even AA’s. well especially AA’s. This would Kill it. especially there is nothing to Pair it with at 11.0.
4 Likes
I won’t oppose the Sabra because it has the highest tank KD in the game, but the Mk.2D is ridiculous.
1 Like
Mode: ARB
Vehicle: F-15J(M)
The F-15Cs are no slouch even with the current 14.0s
The J(M) is better than both the Baz Meshupar and F-15C MSIP II, having not only a better missile kit (AAM-3s are much superior to AIM-9Ms, and the AAM-4 is superior to the AIM-120A in most situations)
Alongside this, the F-15J (M) is 600kg lighter than the other F-15Cs found in game.
I can see all 3 F-15Cs moving up to 14.0, but at the very least the J(M) should.
Since the ZSU-23-4M4 is getting a missile from 2004 (which, with your track record is prolly gonna have 15+Gs of pull and better IRCCM) its a good time for it to be moved up with the other IRCCM-laden SPAAs at 9.7+?
Or how about we ACTUALLY fix the Stingers btw? Or has the MoD still denied clearance to do that?
5 Likes
Honestly I disagree, the TTD is a sidegrade (better shell and thermals but worse reload and mobility) and is alright at 10.3, unless both move to 10.0 which I would be ok with.
Leave them with something. Jesus. Israel’s tech tree is getting way too many player statistic nerfs.
1 Like
Mode: Air Simulator Battles
Vehicle: Su-11
BR: 7.0 → 7.7
Reasoning: The Su-11’s flight performance exceeds that of everything at its BR by an absurd margin. It has a much higher top speed as well as much greater acceleration (as an example, it’s thrust-to-weight ratio is nearly 1.5x higher than the F-80A). Combine that with quite good energy retention and you have a plane that is functionally untouchable at its current BR. At 7.7 it would face much more comparable aircraft while still having advantages over most of them.
6 Likes
Yes exactly, it was already arguably overtiered at 9.7 and now it’s 10.3, totally comical
Give IRIS-T the proper seeker, it’s IIR not IR
currently it is locking onto AGMs fired by planes and losing track despite DL
edit: You can see me literally ignoring the IRIS-T as I’m firing my mavericks
The F-15J(M) is moving up to 14.0
edit - only in arcade, my bad
1 Like