Very well then.
On the other hand however, the A 32A might be an aircraft that should potentially recieve a lower BR, at least in ground.
I remember on the old forum how someone mentioned why the A 32A wasn’t moved down was because of the Sabre players complaining that it was too good (or was it too fast?). But since there’s seperate BRs now for ground and air, then maybe it’s time to bring it back to 8.7, ground wise.
I had a bunch of fun in the f100 I played it enough to get the camo skin for it
Hello, would you guys consider moving the F-2A ADTW from 13.0 Air Simulator Battles to 13.3. The reason being is that it’s missiles specifically the AAM-3 is too good along with its flight model because, its already similar to an F-16, it’s maneuverability is insane. Not many airfract can beat it at that battle rating and they don’t have an easy time doing it either. In addition it’s loadout of ground munitions makes it versatile and a common pick for Air SB brackets that are at 12.3-13.0. At this BR bracket not many planes can defeat the F-2A ADTW which makes the plane an uncontested monster that people when put up against it will usually leave the match because there’s nothing you can do. I would love if you considered this change as an Air Simulator player we usually don’t get any attention.
P.S. There’s still a bug for carriers in Air Simulator Battles where spawning on them doesn’t work and you will be over the ocean and sink in the water and landing on them will not repair and reload you.
Mode : Air Realistic
Vehicle : Sea Hawk Family
Change (FGA.6): 8.0 → 7.7
Change (Mk. 50) : stay at 8.0
Change (Mk.100): stay at 8.0
Reasoning: The new BR changes suggest the German and Dutch versions of the Sea Hawk are on par with the F-25/30 Sabres and the MiG-15bis!? If the ‘Korean War era’ BR changes from last year are not going to be undone (which is a big mistake IMO), then the Sea Hawks should be scaled relative to the early MiG-15s and Sabres.
At this point, moving vehicles to another BR is like moving homeless people to another city - you aren’t solving the problem, you’re just creating a problem somewhere else.
We need a larger BR range!
Everyone I’ve talked to is OK waiting a bit longer for matches, if the matches are fairer.
Flying against planes 2x your speed, or fighting tanks you simply can’t pen is BS!
The difference is the rapier can hit a target with ez, the rolands is like try to guide a drink friend blindfolded along a tightrope with them falling off.
Moving the Sea Hawks isn’t the answer. The simple fact is that the Sabres and MiG-15s are too low in BR, not the lower planes being too high.
if its getting aim 120s it should
Mode : Air Realistic
Vehicle : Yak-3U
Change : 5.7 → 6.0
Reasoning: Insane acceleration, climb, and maneuvering energy retention for its BR. More comparable to 6.0 aircraft.
why are you touching the BR of AMX-32 ,VFM.5 … and the worst thing to touch is PT-16/T14 putting it in the same group as the Type 90, T-90A… that doesn’t make sense… I hope you change that…
Yes the BR “ceiling” is too low decompression is needed for most BR over 8.0
they are not touching it
Mode : Air Realistic
Vehicle : Spitfire LF Mk.IX (all)
Change : 5.7 → 6.0
Reasoning: Best in class climb, excellent acceleration, and excellent turning performance. More comparable to 6.0 aircraft.
especially with that radar
thanks for the information… at least something… it would be nice to see the same for PT-16/T14
Overall, I agree.
The F-86 and MiG-15/17 changes last year were an absolute abomination. That said, the statistics probably don’t show this (since a lot of unskilled players still flock to these planes), so I doubt they will go back up anytime soon. Since that is unlikely, I think it would be reasonable to send the FGA.6 to 7.7.
In a perfect world:
8.3: F-86A-5, MiG-15, CL-13 Mk.4
8.7: F-86F-25/30/35, MiG-15bis, MiG-15bis-ISH, MiG-17, CL-13A Mk.5
9.0: MiG-17PF, Lim-5P, MiG-17AS, F-86F-40, CL-13B Mk.6*
CL-13 Mk.6 may be 9.3 material, but it’s hard to say given how much compression there is from 9.3-10.3.
I can’t remember a time they’ve done a BR round up and it’s been accurate and accepted, there’s always massive outliers which anyone playing for a week would know about.
werent gaijin the one that said france needed a 10.7 tank and here we get the msc which is perfect for the rank as it has bad armour but makes up for it with its reload and its ammo why change its br to 11.0 and destroy france 10.7 lineup as the msc will most of the games be uptiered to 12.0 due to how many plays top tier
I’m currently only like 15 RB kills from the SEA camo skin in the American F-100D as well!
8.0 - 10.0 is just a compressed mess