I haven’t really found the T34’s mobility to be amazing compared to the tiger 2 but I’ll take your word for it
I am literally ignoring the IRIS-T in this clip. anything with 6 AGMs will easily counter it
I could try, but the F-4E is lacking the Pave Spike (present on the Kurnass 2000) that allows in easier target spotting. So it’s going to be hard finding the Radar platform before it’s too late.
T34 is lighter than Tiger 2 and has a better engine (rn Tiger 2 with 700hp vs. T34 with 716hp as default cuz i don’t own it)
I call it historical accuracy
again, F-4E lacks a targeting pod that Gaijin has yet to add to the F-4E, despite existing on the Kurnass 2000.
Hello, I would like to address the change you are making to the T29’s reload time. The Tank has had a 12.5 second reload since it was added at 6.7. The tank was increased in battlerating a few updates ago to 7.0 and it performs optimally at that battlerating. In matches at 6.0 - 7.3 it can play well as a frontline brawler, and in matches at 7.7 - 8.0 it performs a decent role as a support vehicle, staying away from frontline engagements due to HEAT-FS, APDS, and more adanced armor like the T-54s, T-55O, Maus, Conqueror, T-10A, IS-3, IS-4M, etc. In these full upteirs it can sometimes get away with playing aggresive in the right scenarios, but is much better off taking it slow. Increasing the reload time between shots is only going to hurt the vehicle in every battlerating it participates at, making it much less viable in aggresive game play, forcing it to be a much more passive tank. I’m not really sure why if the T29 is getting a reload time increase the 10.5 tiger isn’t getting the same one as well. The 10.5 tiger was given a reload reduction of 15.4 seconds to the same 12.5 second reload time as the T29. Combine that with the stereoscopic range finder accurate to 4km, the 900HP engine giving it much higher acceleration than the T29 and speed, and the 343gm of HE filler in the 10.5 Tiger shell vs the 177gm of the T29, while maitaining nearly the same penetration. It was clear the 10.5 tiger 2 was slightly better, the Only 2 things the T29 did better was a top mounted .50 cal and 2 degrees more gun depression. Now with the reload nerf to the T29 the 10.5 tiger will be outright the best heavy tank at 7.0.
2 Likes
T-4 should not be 8.0 I agree, but not 6.7, that is incredibly low. somewhere from 7.0 to 7.7 would make more sense
10.5 tiger is unobtainable, no point changing something that only a fraction of the playerbase has.
T-4? What are you talking about?
Nope, has M774 and M833 but no M900 in game right now. And I see no mention of it being added in the changes.
These changes suck. This game probably needs the most BR changes it has ever needed and gaijin, after many months of waiting since the last BR changes (which by the way, were also bad and barely did anything), are offering basically nothing to fix the game’s current issues.
1 Like
where was Tu-4 mentioned
I guess I saw something wrong.
in your earlier post, or was that someone else?
the tiger gets nerfed becasue it never had 700hp irl
Its still a vehicle that many players have and will now be at a significant advantage over others, going into the future.
Let’s go my message got removed🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 Guess rock saying It’s the biggest piece of dog shit that I’ve ever heard is Offensive
So you can just do the same to the 10.0s-10.3s as the 12.3 F-16s do to you?
He just threw it into a clean 6 Mig-23ML in combat, from 1.53 km, so why did it escape with one launch of false heat interference? 2 guaranteed frags… Storyteller.