great… my 8.3 line up for ussr is ruined
why does object 140 deserve 8.7 when it’s just t55a but with aphe? why t62a deserve 8.7 if it’s t55a but actually worse and without dshk???
2 Likes
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Leopard 2AV
BR Change: 10.0 - 10.0
Has no armor even for current BR, only DM 33 shell from 9.3 lineup, 105 mm instead of 120 mm on Leo 2k, no autocannon or 50 cal, no thermal as well. Tiny bunch of players has it, so whatever statistics you got, its irrelevant (Same thing with French vehicles: less players - higher results - almost comically high BRs)
4 Likes
Then why is the Challenger 2 at 11.7 whilst being the slowest MBT in the game?
Su-30SM
14.3>15.0
Reasoning:
Decompression,
as part of moving top BR to 15.0 because people can’t be bothered to read more than one post…
2 Likes
Posts with multiple vehicle suggestions are not taken into account.
F-15E, I
14.3>15.0
Reasoning:
Decompression,
as part of moving top BR to 15.0 because people can’t be bothered to read more than one post…
1 Like
F-18C is lighter, and AIM-120C is worse than AIM-120A. No reason for the F-18 to be a lower br than the F/A-18
Rafale
14.3>15.0
Reasoning:
Decompression,
3 Likes
Because it has less countermeasures?
45 on the ocu vs 120 in the 16C
Then don’t use AIM-120C if you prefer the AIM-120B. Nobody’s forcing you to use the better missile if you don’t like it. Hell, it’ll decrease your repair costs to not instal that modification!
It’s not a matter of preference - the 120B is objectively better.
I’m just saying that having the 120C isn’t a reason for the F/A-18 to have a higher BR
Entirely dependent on context.
C5s are better above 10km and when fired at a target in rear-aspect as they can be fired much further away / chase for a lot longer.
The optimal strategy would be to take both. Im too lazy for that on the Typhoon though so just run C5s
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Jagdtiger
BR Change: 6.7 - 6.3
Barely moves as it is, with power reduction would be almost unplayable considerind tons of HEAT shells on 6.3-7.7. No reload, no mobility, questionable armor, no protection against planes. Overall, in comparison to Su 122-54 for example (which also has HEAT on 6.7 and much faster reload) is almost useless in almost any battle.
1 Like
Mode: Ground Arcade Battles
Vehicle: AUBL/74
BR Change: 6.7->6.3
Reasoning: it already suffers at 6.3 because it has no armor, mediocre damage and the tirret bounces off wildly. Putting it against more heavy tanks will make it unusable.
1 Like
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Valentine 1
BR Change: 2.3 - 2.3
Much worse armor than Matilda has, basically the same stats in every other aspect, no reason to put it on 2.7 to face 3.7 whatsoever.
5 Likes
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: AMX-32
BR Change: 9.3 - 9.3
This tank is basically Leo A1A1 L/44, just with 20 mm added, lousy spaced armor on current BR completely irrelevant. No reason for this tank to face Leo 2A4 and even more T-80 in uptier.
16 Likes
Challenger 2E
12…0—>11.7 GRB
Reason: This challenger suffers from having the lowest penning round in top tier and a 4 round ready rack.
however the major shortcoming of being slow has been remedied on this variant and i would assume it would be roughly equivelent to the M1A2 if not slightly worse
buff to ready rack (Should happen regardless)
3 Likes
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: KV-2 (all 3 of them)
BR Change: 3.7 - 4.0
Considering new realoading time and deadly HE, it’s too OP to face 2.7, where some tanks (like British or Italian) still have guns from 1.0.
1 Like
It is easier for me to skip the changes that are bad and just say the ones that are good.
GRB:
Su-25BM 11.0 → 10.7
Su-17M2 10.0 → 9.7
F-4C Phantom II 10.0 → 9.7
Yak-28B 9.3 → 8.7
All of these are good changes.|
Sabra Mk. I 10.0 → 10.3 , reluctantly this is a fair change.
PGZ09 8.7 → 9.0 , this is fine but it needs it’s actual depression angles.
(Object 140, ZA-35, XM800T) 8.3 → 8.7 , these are all good. I stand firm that the XM800T still needs to be removed from the game.
ZSU-23-4M4 getting Igla-S is good but move it up 9.3 → 9.7.
Moving both groups up to rank III is good.
All the reload buffs and debuffs are good.
While sad, if the King Tigers losing h.p. is historical then it’s fine.
Everything else for GRB is a harmful change and genuinely shouldn’t be added.
Genuinely horrendous. It’s a sick and twisted joke.
2 Likes