Yak-141
12.7>13.3, add R-73, R-77
Reasoning:
Decompression, historical armament additions
as part of moving top BR to 15.0 because people can’t be bothered to read more than one post…
Someone tell me how this is
:skull:
Yak-141
12.7>13.3, add R-73, R-77
Reasoning:
Decompression, historical armament additions
as part of moving top BR to 15.0 because people can’t be bothered to read more than one post…
Someone tell me how this is
:skull:
In BVR fights absolutely, but it’s not hard to adapt to R-77’s limits. I almost exclusively use the Flankers in HMD mode so my missiles have a higher chance of hitting the target
Vehicle: CV 9035DK
Gamemode: Realistic
BR Change: 9.7 → 9.0
Reasoning:
Unlike the Strf 9040B, the CV9035DK is belt-fed like the CV9030FIN, yet sits at the same BR of 9.7. Unlike the tanks around the 9.0 area, much like the CV9030FIN, the 9035DK doesn’t feature a secondary weapon to support the 35mm bushmaster.
While, vehicles like the Begleitpanzer 57, BMD-4, BMP-3, BMD-4M feature both an autocannon and a missile launcher are at a lower battle rating. The argument could be made that the 9035 is much more survivable and is much faster overall, but that is currently not the case. Lowering it to 9.0 would give Sweden’s 9.0 lineup a much needed edge that it currently lacks autocannon-wise.
Why are after 10 years suddenly reload times being changed ? Eg. KV 2 From 33,3 to 21,3 seconds ? Why please why… Everything that I could find states the reload took between 35-40 seconds… why is this change being made ?
That is nearly on par with 122mms… I do not understand
152mms should have longer reload than they have now by 10-15% not this…
Gaijin requires each post to only suggest changes to one vehicle. It certainly wasn’t my choice to have to make dozens of posts just to propose a decompression plane. If you want a more comprehensive and compact post, look here, where all the posts have been linked.
And if you’re opposed to top BR moving up and like the compression of top tier, that certainly is… an opinion a person could have, I guess.
@Smin1080p_WT Currently all non-French aircrafts at rank 7 get some missiles available stock, is it currently an oversight or a mistake that the rank 7 french attackers currently do not get missiles available stock?
French rank 7 attackers missing stock missile armament // Gaijin.net // Issues
Mode: Air Arcade Battles
Vehicle: F-4C
BR Change: 10.7 → 10.0
Reasoning: The F-4C has a very sad kit which is worse than 10.3s and even 10.0s. AIM-9Es simply do not have any maneuverability compared to 9Js, 9Ds, and R-60s at the BR. AIM-7D’s have much less energy than an AIM-9C or R530, along with the fact that it takes almost 2 seconds to start pulling.
The FM of the F-4C is not good either. It is not maneuverable, nor is it fast to make up for it. On top of both of those issues, it also has no flares.
I do better in the 13.0 … fighting the same jets 95% of the time. Thats how shit the r77 performs.
Im talking about ground RB
AMX 32 to 9.7 is a joke in no way it should be there.
Same unfunny jokes is uptiering:
Namer 30 why?
Tbh i took at those changes and they are ALL GARBAGE. None of those changes is needed or necessary NONE.
Probably only possible good change can be made for HEAT-FS slingers at 6.0 - 6.7 but still unnecessary… And all those tanks are BAD
I use R-77 like a radar guided R-73, range is the only issue I’ve had with them so I stay low and close the distance
LMAO ! Adding one decent French tank at 10.7 to supposedly fill a gap, just to kill it with 0 line-up 2 month later, just for the pleasure to piss us off.
Don’t get estonished if no one here have an ounce of respect for you all.
So why is the Namer and Namer Tsrikhon both going up to 11.3…
Surely you realise how ignorant of a decision this is considering both have IDENTICAL gun/mobility/firepower yet one has APS… so what are we now assuming the Namer 30 is somehow more performant than the Tsrikhon…
cmon gaijin, make it make sense holy hell.
If these are now going to be 11.7 with literally 9.3 APFSDS then at least give them double spike ammo
@Smin1080p_WT can we get extra ammo if these are both going to be 11.3 in arcade and realistic now, this really makes no sense
It should either be 11.3 or the OTOMATIC should be 10.7. I agree it is too low.
(GRB) Su-25 BM 11.0 > 11.3/11.0 — very potent A2G munitions + R-73. Just imagine what its going to do in downtier.
don’t call him a slur, he might be a tad… misguided but that’s no reason to lash out
True, A10C must get a higher BR
It’s literally OP in sim
the msc should not in any way be moved up, at 10.7 its decent, its ammo is ok at 425mm of pen only being carried by its very fast speed, its mobility is alright, armor is on the poorer side and sights being ok. the reason the vehicle preforms well is because french players tend to be veterans not normal casual players. moving it to 11.0 would do nothing but make it so france will again have no 10.7 lineup but also isolate the msc to be ignored as bringing a 2a4 to a uptier is already a disaster
the PT16 shouldnt be moved up simply because it already lacks strong ammo and thermals as well as armor for the br, moving it to 11.0 would put it only .3 below the type90 which offers better everything, ammo, sights, thermals, composite by miles and at 10.7 dm23 is already a weaker round to the other 120mm shells you can find around that area
Vehicle: TAM, TAM 2C, TAM 2IP
Gamemode: Realistic
BR Change:
TAM: 8.7 → 9.7
TAM 2C: 10.3 → 11.3
TAM 2IP: 9.3 → 10.3
Reasoning: Light tanks are a lower battle rating because of their armor, but for the TAM series, that is not the case. As all of them feature shells that are found as standard on the Leopard 2 series in the 10.0+ region, combined with great armor, then these vehicles should be raised by one BR as they could be considered on the same level as the CV90105, albeit without an autoloader.
For decompression and balance’s sake, these three light tanks are not something that should face T-55s and Centurions on the regular, and instead should face vehicles of the T-80, Challenger 1 and M1 series.
Mode : Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle : Sabra Mk.1
Change : 10.0 → 10.0
Reasoning : Why does Sabra only go up while M60AMBT remain at 10.0?
aren’t 120C-5s and 120Bs borderline equal with their current representation? either way, i really don’t think BVR should be the ultimate balancing factor at top tier, you still end up in dogfights pretty often in my experience