F-14A IRIAF
13.0>13.3
Reasoning:
Decompression plus the Fakours are still cracked
1 Like
I don’t play sim, but occasionally I see the BRs and just laugh. Same thing with arcade
Challenger 2F
11.7—>11.3 GRB
Reason: The Challenger 2 at this day and age doesnt fit its current BR as the M1A2 is at the same br while being better in every way except for thermals. Also this variant is just more fat but still one of the better ones
- buff to ready rack (Should happen regardless)
Or stay 11.7 with a potential reload buff again maybe :)
6 Likes
F-14B
13.0>13.3
Reasoning:
decompression, mainly
1 Like
50% of it is compression. Like realistically all of the 9.7 Harriers could be spread out over at least 2 BRs, if not 3. And the same is true for the Hunters…
But the other 50% is just Gaijin be idiots
1 Like
Challenger 2 TES
11.7—>11.3 GRB
Reason: The Challenger 2 at this day and age doesnt fit its current BR as the M1A2 is at the same br while being better in every way except for thermals. Also this variant is just more fat and the ERA is supposedly a bit underperforming
- buff to ready rack (Should happen regardless)
Or stay 11.7 with a potential reload buff again maybe :)
5 Likes
SHar FA.2
13.0>13.3
Reasoning: decompression and moving ARH carriers away from 3rd gens.
Python 3s aren’t IRCCM.
1 Like
There’s a 12.0 to 11.0 bracket in simulator. it won’t face Fox-3s. it’s the BR in which the F-4S rules with AIM-7F.
Wym? It’s got a worse kit than the F-4E?
1 Like
I’d include “With buffs” in there as well. Its really hard to justify it not being the same BR as the F-14A at the moment.
Sigh
Here we go again…
Ground RB, M26. 6.7 → 6.3
I propose a revert to the M26’s former BR of 6.3
-
It is directly outclassed by other US vehicles at 6.7, such as T26E5 and T26E1-1. These are more heavily armored and/or better armed variants of the M26. They are obviously different and shouldn’t share a BR.
-
It is comparable with tanks such as Panther A and Tiger 1E, which sit at a BR of 6.0, a whopping two BR steps lower. The tanks are roughly comparable in Armor and firepower, but I will concede the M26 is slightly better than either thanks to it’s mobility and handling. That’s why I advocate for 6.3 BR, a difference of 0.3 from these vehicles.
2 Likes
F/A-18A
12.3>13.3, add AIM-9M
Buff, historical accuracy, and moving it away from 3rd gens.
So let me get this straight;
You are moving up Begleit to 9.7 but keep the significantly more broken BMP-3, BMD-4 and BMD-4M at 9.0 and 9.3 respectively?
Did I miss something? Surely that means you’d finally be willing to give it atleast ONE of the things it’s supposed to have?
APDS? (literally just copy 57 mm slpprj m/49 and give it ~1500m/s V0, you made up half the vehicle anyway, not like this is gonna be the fatal inaccuracy)
Smokes?
HWS?
IRST? (E-Type FCS)
Third ammo slot?
HOT ATGM?
No? None of that?
Was it too good at clicking premium BMD-4M players with the situational awareness and reaction-time of a brick? Did they sell too poorly because there was another popular “IFV-like” vehicle at the same br?
Is this the “move up TKX(P) but keep the premium Type 90 at the same br” thing all over again?
3 Likes
It was good not op i played with it
The solution is a nerf to the reload not making it undertierd
Now its worse 120s
18A w/ 9Ms would be fair at 13.0, it’s similar to the F-15A
F-15A
13.0>13.7
Reasoning:
Part of the greater decompression move, great FM, great armament, and Gaijin this is why requiring individual posts for each vehicle is a terrible idea
J-7D. It has no business at 10.7, not with that missile kit. Since J-7E is 11.3, 11.0 would be a more fitting BR for the J-7D.
Also Su-25BM is gonna be a bully at 10.7 with the R-73s. It’s faster than the A-10 so it’ll have a higher combat presence, especially in downtiers.
6 Likes
stupidest comment award of 2025 goes to this user right here.
1 Like
Mode: Naval Realistic Battles
Vehicle: S.O.4050 Vautour IIB
BR: 9.3 → 8.0/8.3
Reasoning:
In terms of the composition of the outboard armament, the aircraft was not far from the IL-28 or Canberra located on BR 8.0 and 8.3, respectively.
There is nothing in it that justifies such a high br as 9.3: no guided weapons, no ballistic computer.
3 Likes