Amx-32 (120) going up in br?? It only has ~20mm more pen and gained immunity against autocannons compared to the 105 version, that’s it. Fcs is still bad.
7 Likes
(ARB) F-16A Block 10 Netz/Netz (Mod) 12.7 > 12.3 — P3 is a comparable missile to a Aim-9L. Its worse at close shots and better at long ones. Its not straight up better. This plane should be at 12.3 BR like other F-16As without Fox-1 missiles.
14 Likes
(GRB) AH-1F Tzefa D/E 9.7 > 9.3 — Heli without A2A missiles, optical track and a bad A2G missiles. Just a one BR step higher sits French EC-665 Tiger HAP with far superior weponry, flight perfomance and ability to optical lock (extremely useful with chin mounted gun)
7 Likes
Out of season april fools jokes striking once again. I am impressed on how focussed your guys are on some spreadsheet that shows you that a tech tree vehicle in a minor nation performs better than a premium in the russian 10.3 lineup. I am truly impressed on how bad these changes end up to be.
Not like we are complaining since ages for the 2S38, T80Ud, Bmd4 or Bmp3 to go up
4 Likes
But it has been suggested and requested at every single BR change proposal since it was added. Quite literally every single one. The 2S38 needs to go up. You continually raise every other equivalent vehicle but the 2S38. Either the likes of the HSTV-L and Puma should come down one BR step, or the 2S38 needs to go up. It is coming across as bias or favouritism.
2 Likes
The reason why the loading time of T29 is short is that there are two loaders, which is also the biggest difference from T95 and T28. Why increase the loading time of T29?
4 Likes
Almost a whole year after being added and Antelope is STILL at 10.3!
Why!? It’s 9.3 at best.
According to statshark, it has a 0.73 kills per death ratio, by FAR the worst of all the 10.3 SPAAs, and this is coming from someone who has a 2.1 K/D in it.
Also, the br increase of the msc doesn’t make any sense, it’s essentially a leopard 2a4 but with an autoloader and slightly better mobility.
Mode: Air Realistic Battles
Aircraft: F-84F (All)
Changes:
- 8.3 → 8.0
- (Non-USA) Tier VI → Tier V to get its airspawn back.
Reasoning: The F-84F is a struggle bus with abysmal flight performance. It doesn’t perform well in dogfights, as it can’t turn, can’t accelerate, and can’t reach competitive speeds compared to its peers. Please lower the tier of non-US F-84Fs to grant their air spawn. It’s comical that the US F-84F is the only F-84F that has the airspawn.
10 Likes
12.0 has to get massive air rb decompression for exampel how the F4S with a rather medicore missiles and mid radar can face a F2A adtw and ice? while the changes are more postive and how the hornets dominate 12.7 same with the hornet at 12.3
just a imo
done
Thry should do this and then add the long time in waiting M50 (French M4 SA50) as its replacement, potentially also include some other vehicles like the cromwell, charrioteer and other captured vehicles
2 Likes
kv-220 只有135mm穿深再提高权重没法玩了，防护也不够长88 100炮和D25T打的
1 Like
Even if Gaijin decided it’s a light tank, it’s actually and SPAA…
With the new 14.3 Br in air, can we maybe move all the Arh capable planes out of 13.0?
Namer 30 and Tshrikon: Spikes 4 → 8
The massive battle bus Ifv that struggles to move around the map could really need some additional firepower especially since the autocannon is useless in non flaking situations. Giving it more spikes would allow for more potential in the tank
5 Likes
Some of them (Tornado F.3 Late and Sea Harrier FA2) are much worse than the other 13.0 ARH carriers
Maybe those 2 (and mayb the JA37DI) stay at 13.0 while the others move up?
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles and Air Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Me 262 A-1a
BR Change: 7.0 → 6.7
Reasoning: In both modes, this jet is a worse version of Me 262 A-1a/Jabo, placed on same BR. Inspite equal Flight model and gun armament, In ARB it has no air respawn which gaves Jabo a lot of advantage while in GRB it has no access to Bombs and Wfr.Gr.21 missiles which greatly limits its capabilities of striking ground targets comparing to Jabo with offering nothing in return.
5 Likes
Tiger II
Engine HP reductions are honestly unecessary and ruin the mobility of an already questionable tank. While the Maximum Speed reduction is tolerable, the HP loss isn’t really what should be done.
Su-122-54
BR 6.7>7.0
APDS, HEATFS, a very fast reload. It’s cousin, the 268 was moved up to 7.0 long ago despite it performing even worse and having worse armour.
T29 reload nerf
Unnecessary? What makes the T29 great is the perfect balance between armour, mobility and firepower. Are you trying to tell me it has a reload only .9 faster than the IS-6 and .1 than the T10M?
The 105 is inferior to the 122mm in terms of post pen. Don’t take away it’s only advantage, but given how irrelevant USSR has been at midtier as of late, not a surprise.
KV2 reload buff
After all those years, you found 11 or so seconds? Hard to believe that a 152mm can load not much slower than a 122- It should stay the same.
Begleit is no comment. It’s 9.7 only in a world where the BMD4 is 10.0
8 Likes
An extreme example would be the A2D-1, 9.0 in AB (it even gets raised to 9.3 in naval AB to make sure one can’t use it…) and 7.0 in RB, and since nobody plays it at 9.0 in AB there is no new data input and it’s stuck at that BR forever…
1 Like