he is talking about very long range tho. Even if 20km+ engagements dont matter the r77-1 has the edge over the mica at extreme ranges
Ground RB - MSC : 10.7 > 10.7 (stay at 10.7 instead of moving up at 11.0)
There is no way the MSC should have a higher BR than a Leopard 2A4, an M1 Abrams, a T-80B or a Challenger Mk.3… No way also it is equivalent to a T-90A. And last, it has a line up with the Leopard 2A4 and the Leopard 2A4NL (OTCo), not only it would destroy the line up and the MSC will be alone at 11.0, it is (again) not better than those 2 Leopard and so have no reason to move up. It should stay at 10.7 or deserve at worst new vehicles added at 11.0 to line up with (hopefully it’s the plan to add a bunch of 11.0 to France in the next update along the MSC, right ?).
LMAO, probably a troll or deluded AF. MICA has mediocre range. R-77-1 < AIM-120A/B/C due to worse energy retention after motor burns off.
Funny how you and the other guy have no experience with the R-77-1 or MICA but claim that they are the best missiles. Just because you got killed by them a few times doesn’t mean they are the best.
Then it should get it’s 6 Fakours and R-73s. I’ll change it maybe.
I mean we are talking about the missiles and not the planes.
congrats. 13.3
Any docs proving this?
source for that ?
Ground realistic battles, OTOMATIC. 11.3 > 10.7
At its current BR, the OTOMATIC lacks sufficient range to deal with the aircraft that it faces, as its mediocre fire rate and slow shell velocity limit its effective range to a mere 3 - 4 km, despite multiple SPAAs at lower BRs like 2S6 Tunguska and ASRAD-R having significantly longer range.
As a result, the aircraft that OTOMATIC faces can release munitions well outside of its effective range, and any friendly SPAAs are able to down aircraft long before they get close enough for the OTOMATIC to engage.
In addition, since around four months ago, OTOMATIC’s HE-VT shells no longer fuse against incoming missiles, further reducing its effectiveness.
You can look it up??
Look up Iranian F-14 R-73
you show us bro ur the one wanting that
True but even at 30 KM the MICA and the R-77-1 are very close with the MICA having all the better capabilities i’ve stated
alright 13.3 with 30 pops of countermeasures good luck :)
Wikipedia, mate?
It could stay at 13.0 with the R-73s tho
It wouldn’t really make sense to put it at 9.0 while there’s A32A (which is, in my opinion, a better version of 105G)
yeah mica is the better missile by far. Thats why I said as the first message that the mica and r77-1 are better than the c5 even at range. Anyone defending the c5 is just delusional
I’d accept this, if the Flakpanzer 341 is allowed to still be at 6.3 of all BR’s, then surely the poor Kugel can get down to 6.7
eh maybe, I still think it would be 13.3 w/ them.
eehhh, maybe
that’s why it’s a suggestion, after all