Swede swede, you bastard you take that back
/s this is a joke people.pls no ban
Also am Danish…
I know
Evil Grin
1 Like
Except that their statistical performance is pretty well in line with most other top tier MBTs in game?
Hell most MBTs perform pretty similarly statisitically except for the Type 10s (actual minor nation players), Merkava Mk.4s (actual minor nation players) and 2A7s/122s (best MBTs in game currently).
The level of gluttony they talk about in the bible
1 Like
To be fair the mig19 could counter the xs in a dogfight but only if the xs is out of missiles which is never
This is the limiation of player stats.
US is one of, if not the most popular nations and consistantly have some of the best vehicles at most BRs and yet typically have the worst stats.
In terms of vehicle performance Abrams is just much closer to the Leopard 2s than they are to everyone else and if reload rate is meant to be used as a balancing tool, then it shouldnt have a 5 second reload.
1 Like
When will it get change? it already august.
Let them cook bro we still have changes needed
At least as far my knowledge goes, it’s only missing it’s R-60Ms vs the Su-39 whose missing having of its ordinance.
German heavies got absolutely nerfed. Gotta stop them before everything became unplayable
They also saved 8.0 from bmp3. Just let them cook
I think at top tier major part of their previous low winrates are more to do that they were a major nation without a clear win condition mechanic for the average player to use. Imo this has always been more of a problem than supposed “less skilled players”. USSR had uncontested Kh38 spam for a long time and Germany just had/has the 2A7 which has been top 2 MBT ever since it’s introduction. US had good vehicles, but they haven’t had such an obvious win condition in a while.
But yeah Japan and Israel high stats are due to players. These nations alongside France that have actually managed to back up the “minor nations have better players” claim.
Abrams is fine as it is compared to the rest, sure you could nerf the reload to 5.5 seconds and it will still do okay, but saying that it’s anywhere close to the 2A7s is cute.
nah just release it and then we will update it… I want decompression of Air NOW.
looking at the max AoA isnt comparing flightmodels there is more to it than ITR
In the absence of a decompression, the next best thing is just trying to balance the tanks at top tier.
Reload rate advantages were the default for a while for things like the CR2 and Type 90/type 10 but in recent years seems to have been forgotten.
It’s no 279, but it still has the 14.5mm that make short work of lights or Turms III turrets. Plus at 8.3, you can pair with PT-76-57. Fun-fun. Shame I missed out on getting that damn coupon in the KV-7 event, lol.
For the draken it isnt. Id take the mig19 airframe over the drakens any day of the week but since the draken gets 9js the main goal is to get the nose around asap
You are absolutely right.
At the same time, isnt it likely that plane with that much better ITR will have other aspects of its FM better than the compared planes?
A higher ITR can sometimes mean an inversely lower STR and sometimes STR is more valuable than ITR.
Though generally an aircraft with good ITR probably has attributes that support a good overall dogfighter
1 Like