Magic 2 and R-73 have the exact same IRCCM and flare resistance
1 Like
magic2 is actually more flare rsistant
3 Likes
smaller base FOV and I think the seeker shrinks the moment you get a lock instead of after leaving the rail like R-73
the main thing is that its faster than the r73 which makes it faster for the fov to just capture the plane
1 Like
First start with ZTZs and their 7.1s, as the 80s with 6.5 are already in better position.
That way from mid plane you make useless plane.
Yeah i saw… so. We will have 3. 9.3 (amx 32 105, vbci, and santal) vehicles. 2. 9.7 vehicles (amx 32 and roland) 2. 10.0 vehicles (vextra and amx10) 1. 10.7 and 1. 11.0
… are they smoking something? They wanted to add vehciles to prevent this. And then they just do the things the tech tree doesnt need and the same issue’s repeat themselves.
1 Like
which shouldn’t be,… as told earlier,…
F-14: Maybe because they have AIM-54’s, AIM-7F and a radar that gives no shit,… unlike the Mirage4000 RDM-3 which doesn’t have a full PD radar but only PD HDN
for the rest of it,… as a M4K player i told you that 12.3-12.7 are Outturning outrating you quite easily,… which makes Magic-2 unable to be locked on anything that is turning with you.
-no reason for flags -
Netz has 6x Python-3. Thats it.
Why is it equal in performance to the 8x Magic II that the M4K has? And ontop of that you do actually get short ranged BVR missiles you can choose to take. The Netz doesnt even get that much.
I hope this is comedy value taken from my profile description.
turn better than M4K (pulling 14G vs 9G)
accelerate quite the same (due to having 5.3Tons differences, on the basis)
ain’t as a Big-ass target for gun rounds than M4K
have a better Rate of climb (approx. 30m/s difference)
the only think in favor of M4K - max speed in altitude,… that i’ll never get due to it unable to get Fox-1 fire before anyone else.
Vehicle: M1A2 SEP V2
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: None
Change: Reduce reload rate to 6 seconds
Reason: Reload rate is meant to be used as a balancing factor for vehicles. At it currently stands, the M1A2s have a performance well above most other MBTs at top tier and yet maintains a 5 second with one of the best shells at top tier. The reload rate should be reduced to match that of the Leopard 2A7s
1 Like
Vehicle: M1A2 SEP
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: None
Change: Reduce reload rate to 6 seconds
Reason: Reload rate is meant to be used as a balancing factor for vehicles. At it currently stands, the M1A2s have a performance well above most other MBTs at top tier and yet maintains a 5 second with one of the best shells at top tier. The reload rate should be reduced to match that of the Leopard 2A7s
1 Like
Vehicle: M1A2 Abrams
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: None
Change: Reduce reload rate to 6 seconds
Reason: Reload rate is meant to be used as a balancing factor for vehicles. At it currently stands, the M1A2s have a performance well above most other MBTs at top tier and yet maintains a 5 second with one of the best shells at top tier. The reload rate should be reduced to match that of the Leopard 2A7s
1 Like
you mean increase?
Uh…Yes?
God thats a grammatically tricky sentence.
"Reduce the speed in which the tank is loaded and therefore increase the reload time "
Vehicle: M1A1 Click-Bait
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: None
Change: Reduce reload rate to 6 seconds
Reason: Reload rate is meant to be used as a balancing factor for vehicles. At it currently stands, the M1A1 Click-bait has a performance well above most other MBTs at top tier and yet maintains a 5 second with one of the best shells at top tier. The reload rate should be reduced to match that of the Leopard 2A7s
1 Like
Saab J35XS
Realistic air combat
10.3 BR change to 9.3 BR with replacement of Aim 9j with Aim 9b, possibly 9E
Let me explain: everyone who has played with it knows that the main weapons are missiles, of which there are six… But anyone who has played with it and owns it will tell you that it is practically impossible to use them all. Solely because of them, the glider, designed in the mid-1950s, has to fight enemies that surpass it in flight characteristics. Practically anyone can outmaneuver it in a steady climb, and I’m talking about 9.7-10.0 fighters, which I’ve only seen three times in 70 battles. Any maneuver = loss of speed (and it has no acceleration dynamics, comparable only to the 9.3/9.7 models). Without it, it’s just fodder with excellent flight characteristics on paper, but in practice, even an attack aircraft from the same 9.7-10.0 models can outmaneuver it. Aim 9J(P) - let’s be honest, it’s useless on such a glider, with practically 0 benefit, and the combat rating is inflated. Anyone who says that this is a good rocket is wrong - against 9.3/9.7/10.0 and only if there are no countermeasures. As for the cannon armament… There is only one at the root of the wing, which means you can forget about aimed shooting, it’s purely luck. 12 countermeasures - it’s great that they are there at all, but they don’t save you from Aim9L, R73, R60M. There is no radar warning system, which already closes access to any high-altitude flights, and the chance of survival in such situations is close to zero in the realities of the game. Also, everyone who plays and sees it knows that it is an easy, large, toothless target. At 9.3, it won’t be so vulnerable and will be able to play its role as a fighter, rather than a punching bag, especially without Aim 9J. Technically, it won’t be able to break the balance.
Increase speed = shorter time. 6s → 5s
Increase time = lower speed. 5s → 6s
But yeah, not the easiest wording to wrestle with x)
2 Likes