Planned Battle Rating changes for August 2025 (updated 16:00, 15.08)

it was anounced in this post, therefore it is the right place, this is the appropiate thread

No, your post lacks any relevance to BR, rather your post is asking for a a-historical change which invalidates any credibility you have, i suggest posting documents if you believe otherwise Gaijin.net // Issues

This would be the correct place to post any information if you believe gaijin has it wrong.

I know lol.
It’s gonna be on par or superior to the harriers still, which I’d call the benchmark 9.7
The guy I was having the debate with was wanting the dutch hunter moved back to 9.0, of which it dominated not too long ago.

1 Like


image

And a few others.
If you got a source, go for it.
Otherwise, the reload is fine.

1 Like

Will easily outperform a few aircraft already at 9.7

1 Like

I was thinking more the Hunters. A well played Harrier would probably still win against an A-4 and most also have CMs, but something like the Hunter F6 has weaker missiles, no CMs and not even necessarily a better dogfighting performance

ahistorical like the f5cs flares and missiles? or ahistorical like us f5E weapons/flares (exept 9E) or the working ahistorical r27 on the f14 or the ahistorical boats, or the ahistorical tanks, or the ahistorical whatever you can really go forever with this

I personally don’t think the F.6 or GR.1 should sit at 9.7
I was comparing the ayit with the GR.3 or AV8A/Cs fitted with the 9Gs and countermeasures.
the F.6 is pretty much a straight downgrade from the Ayit.
SRAAM fixes aren’t looking likely as it only affects britain and the bugreports are getting very old…

The HF-24 should go down in br. At 9.0 it is quite outclassed and they are never seen in game now only a few months after the event.

Again use the correct site to adress the concern if its wrong, this isn’t the area for that.

Side note yes id be fine with a historical F-5C but that wasn’t the topic vehicle, it was the NF-5A. Again if you believe its wrong please use the correct forums

how so, its quite a solid plane at 9.0

F-2A: Give it 4x AAM-4B and then move it up in BR (Air RB)

Yeah. I agree.

TBH I have been finding it pretty solid at 9.0 for air RB (been using it to grind the F106 event)

GRB however I would agree, it should likely drop because it has no MCLOS, no AAM, no RWR, no flares, no CCIP, no CCRP.

Its a dumb bomb bomber and it fights SAM systems, 8.7 or even 8.3 would be more suitable.

It should lose airspawn. Its crazy it gets airspawn but something totally and completely unarmed like the Buc S1 doesnt.

1 Like

Bucc S1 should prob be moved to rank V honestly lol. Not the Marut being hit instead.

2 Likes

Yup.

Casual plug:

1 Like

No idea how that is still 9.7. What makes the Ayit work is that it is quite slow (compared to MiG-21, F-104, and other spam at 9.3-10.3), but it has AIM-9D which easily bridge the gap. Hunter is slow while having missiles that only seem to work within 1KM or they blow up. I just don’t get it.

Yeah… Its all because they use to be good. But these days. are barely worth taking. But multiple reports to buff them. Including one to double their effective range. Only 3 years old that report

1 Like

Mode: ASB
Vehicle: F-111A
BR change: 10.3 > 10.7
Reason: fast bomber/attacker with a massive payload and a rear aspect MAW system at a BR with rear-aspect missiles only
as a sidenote it is currently being abused for the event due to a flaw in the gamemode

1 Like