the stats of the vehicle duh ?
1 Like
Considering it had only 65k battles in July, I don’t think it’s only uncommon. For example, many vehicles around it’s BR had 0.5 - 1m battles during the same period.
If you take only major nations from 8.7 to 9.3, Object 279 is 35th most played vehicle out of 40 in total. I think that speaks volumes.
Do tell me how though.
aphe and reverse speed are the only things going for it lmao. plays more like a medium than a heavy. dont get me wrong its a pretty decent tank just not god tier op like some people claim it is. if you actually have as many games in it as you claim you would know this
It’s highly survivable. Silly to claim otherwise. And I never said god-tier OP, I’m saying it should be with its partner in crime, the BMP-3, at 9.3.
2 Likes
by “highly survivable” you mean almost any tank even in a full down tier can point and click to kill you with 1 dart lmfao
what a joke thinking it should go to 9.3. lower it to 8.7 tbh
By actually having a balance team that thinks about balance changes. The reason bmd4 stood so low in br was bc of its horrid players which lowered the stats. Any sensible person could look at the bmd4 and say “wow this thing is better than the begleitpanzer it should be higher in br”. Or look at the j7d and go “wow this thing gets to fight flareless planes while being better than the mig21 bis (arguably)” but no. They dont wanna spend time actually thinking it out so they just look at the player stats. and unsuprisingly prem vehicles have bad players which keep them low in br
Sory for the yap sesh
Somehow I cannot imagine still the KV2 with such a low reload, same with T30. Lets see how it unfolds on the battlefield.
And if the Tiger P gets less power it should be downtiered to 6.3 again as it completely vanishes the main advantage point of the Tiger II Ps compared to other nations
10 Likes
pvkv2 aswell its gonna get freaky
3 Likes
Oh NOES THEY PENNING ME WAHAHH
Also, don’t even talk to me arcade ground player. I’m talking realistic battles. I don’t care what BR the 279 is in arcade.
1 Like
i dont care about your “realistic” mode which is basically cas simulator in disguise. i checked your profile, i do better with the 279 in ab with capped 3 respawns than you do in rb. so btfo lmfao
Arcade stats are not real stats. Be gone kid.
Here enjoy this video
1 Like
You’d need to have a weighting system in place for all the different parameters vehicles have, which is very hard to do objectively.
Again with parroting this argument which is pretty much nonsensical.
I’d be really curious to see
the supposed stat increases for the AEC Mk II and the SARC Mk VI (6-pounder) played by the average player that justify their impending br increase.
How is this nonsensical. It is being said alot bc thats the case
25 seconds is too fast? There is already plenty of large caliber HE slinger across every br but all of them doesn’t take years to load another shell, even the reserve 1.0 15cm sig dishing out more DPM than the 6.7 T30 lol this update would only make these vehicles less boring to play as they currently spent half the match sitting behind cover reloading, only thing going for them is armor. Also HE is inconsistent, further lowering the reload time to 20 seconds still the T29 will outperformed it in terms of DPM, also making it slightly closer to T34 as it currently the worst variant out of the three.
…Sending a message that you’re bad at videogames?
That’s the only thing I see when somebody shoots more than two missiles at me in one instance.
Me when I dont know anything about screwing around
many such cases…
No reason to let it continue to bully and molly-woop everything in a downtier either. I am reminded of the argument for the all-aspect attackers. “Its better to punish/ruin one vehicle then to let a whole rank/BR suffer.”