The guy was out turning my Milan magically, a MILAN.
I don’t think it’s that unrealistic for Gaijin to add 12.7 for ground. Those two extra steps would really help higher and top tier.
Yeah it’s a bit nuts to think the T-80Us are only one br below the Leo 2a7s
The only difference in the M4A3E2 (76) W from a standard M4 Sherman is the British put a 17 pounder gun in the turret so that it could defeat the frontal armor of a Tiger 1 it could not defeat the sloped armor of a Tiger 2 and it did not have 101 mm of frontal armor it had 63 mm again historical inaccuracy
Would prob be better if they did 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, etc
They would be a great addition the problem is we’ve needed proper decompression for how long? We had to force them to do it with air multiple times.
1 Like
Yeah, this is 75% of the problem
do you have proof of the inaccuracy?
… What ever you’ve smoked I’d like some holy
You are describing the Sherman Firefly, the Sherman Firefly never received a US designation as it never entered US service. In British service they were designated Sherman IC or VC depending on if a M4A1 or M4A4 chassis was used.
The M4A3E2 was an “Assault tank”/Heavy Tank designed in March/April 1944, and was to be delivered in August 1944. The first prototypes were provided in June 1944. A total of 254 E2 were produced, 250 were shipped to Europe.
Some were field modified for 76mm guns.
This isn’t hard information to find.
(oh and ps, then even field modded E8s with extra armour)
3 Likes
Nope! Just excessive Cope and an inability to use a search engine.
A massive skill issue if you ask me
2 Likes
I don’t even know how someone believes this. The 76 Jumbo does not look British at all
2 Likes
7/10 ragebait, very confident, provides an absolutely wild and false take, and even better the bait isn’t that obvious.
-3 points because the topic isn’t that contraversial, well it isn’t really a topic at all, just completely false. Could gain 3 points for putting in something political.
Otherwise great content
4 Likes
This dude only plays ground arcade, what do you expect
1 Like
Vehicle: Tu-4
Gamemode: All
Change: Reduce BR to 6.7 or lower (similar to the Me-264)
Reason: The Tu-4 is extremely slow for its current BR and constantly faces jets and missiles that it has no chance against. At its current BR, it is almost impossible to play in any mode (Arcade, Realistic, or Simulator). The Me-264 has very similar performance and characteristics, yet sits at a much lower BR. Aligning the Tu-4’s BR closer to that of the Me-264 would make gameplay more balanced and actually playable.
1 Like
Tu-4 is substantially better than the Me-264. A better comparison would be the B-29 at 7.0. Though Tu-4 might be stronger than it. I agree with 7.0-7.3. But shouldnt be lower than that at the moment
2 Likes
Plus push the stock AIM-120 to the inner pylon so we can use 4 AIM-9M when we researched.
F-15 - All variants
Move the stock AIM-120 to the front fuselage pylon so we can use 4 IR missiles when researched.
1 Like
F-104 - The variants that can use AIM-9J/P
Add researchable AIM-9E since many of the F-104 have AIM-9E stock but no researchable one but only AIM-9B and it is very annoying to keep switching AIM-9B and AIM-9E.
1 Like
PZH2000 (all variants) 7.7 → 8.0
Reason: overly tanky, fast, quick reload, great cannon
7 Likes
T95E1
8.3 → 8.0
T95E1 use only 90mm APFSDS with no STAB while Magach 5 using 105mm with APFSDS and US 8.0 line up can have more tanks to bring with.
1 Like