Planned Battle Rating changes for August 2025 (updated 16:00, 15.08)

I think you’re on to something

3 Likes

I guess i’ve thought of the Leopard 1 hull as squishy and the M48/M60 hull as pretty durable then for too long.

Given you stated the 279 as a tank you die to 35mm AA a lot, you really shouldn’t have any problem dealing with them. They have to hit a pixel perfect shot on your cupola which takes a while but you can just put your crosshair anywhere on them.

Cus it is ?

it’s the best 6.3 tank, issue is the matchmaker doesn’t treat it well

@Stona_WT Thank you for continuing to mention the changes to the aerial simulation.

And we are explaining that the br change you suggest is a bad suggestion. You just refuse to understand

4 Likes

Yes i have, you barely turned 45° you can notch top down combined with multi path at that alt easy but dodging any missile at that range would have been pretty hard arh or sarh

It can frontally kill most tanks it faces while having insanely good armor and decent mobility alongisde a stabilizer. It is great at its br

1 Like

That’s such a nonsense!

We already have a MiG-29G in german TT with both R-73 AND R-27ER and it doesn’t ssems like that one wrecks havoc all around the matchmaker. Thus, moving regular 12.7 MiG-29 up in BR with new R-73 is such a stupid idea i can’t even express.

MiG-29 12.7 → 12.7 with retraction of R-27ER and introduction of R-73 though seems like a completely fair change both nerfing and buffing the plane simultaneously in different domains.

4 Likes

Thank god for Tigers with 62-82mm side armor.
And people think the KV-220 is too weak at 6.0 with 100mm side armor.

1 Like

Vehicle: F4EJ,F4EJ ADTW
Gamemode: All
Change: lower br to 10.7 (or buff radar/give it AIM-7-E2)
reason: at 11.0 it suffers with a absolutely horrible radar,flight performance of a actual slab of cement with wings and gets absolutely clapped at a full uptier

Looking at half of these comments, this has got to be the most insufferable thread I’ve seen

3 Likes

At this point I dont even blame gaijin for not listening to the community and ignoring us.

6 Likes

First time in the BR change threads maybe 😂?
hang-first-time

4 Likes

Yea probably it, I’m not a good player by any metrics or vehicle but I have a feeling a few people are a bit too excited to lash out over a vehicle recieving a br change.

2 Likes

Yeah, things always change, especially BR’s. Best thing we can/should do is make our case with as little emotional attachment as possible 🙂 It has also happened many times before that a vehicle will go UP, only to go back DOWN at a later time once it is clear that the initial change wasn’t warranted. And vice versa. Is what it is.

1 Like

Those people dont care about anything or anyone else other than themselves. They just want to have the most advantages. They want to keep their op vehicles op while making their good vehicles op

3 Likes

You called him the c word and then they removed your post for insulting him. Are you actually a real person ?

2 Likes

Like I’m sad about the tiger 2 nerf (I understand it’s from a historical accuracy view) but on the other end I’m ecstatic the Ho-Ni family/Stuer Emil/Dicker Max buffs.

I am sad about the m2k 5f nerf bc am just 200k rp away from it but am also happy about the pvkv2 reload buff. That thing has been overshadowed by the pvkv3 for so long due to its horrid reload. A 13 second reload for an open top vehicle with 75mm gun was stupid

1 Like