The 1944 manual for the tiger 2 and Maybach 230 being governed to 2500 RPM whereas the 700 horsepower figure comes from 3000 RPM
3 Likes
is this again some kind of fake realism-nerf? Like the 120mm ADPS shattering for the Conquerer or Conway? Where a chosen amount of vehicles get “historical realistic weaknesses” implemented while others don’t?
Nerfing the mobility of already heavy vehicles in 2025, where the game meta already fully became 60kph+ light vehicle galore?
This will definitley help the whole gaming experience in this already massively flawed game.
It’s historical and they should make more historical changes across the board
2 Likes
this game exists since 20012 and up to today they never achieved this kind of realism for all vehicles equally. Get rid of this idiotic idea of making already slow and heavy vehicles even slower for the sake of “realism” unless you want to thin out the playable vehicles even more and make the game even more meta gameplay infested.
Argue with the document I guess
2 Likes
Yeah perfect vehicles only count when it’s a certain country, cough t-34 4th gear fantasy tank, 45mm angle pen yak 9k fantasy round and plane, 85mm fantasy angle pen etc…
I guess then the next realism change will be ripped off turrets by sheer kinetic force? Because thre is proof that a 128mm kwk44 could do that to a churchill turret.
I’m pretty sure a Churchill would already be knocked out by the KWK 44 to the turret anyway in game
You can’t fire the Ratel 20 from behind cover (ATGM) anymore. It tracks the gun turret only, e.g. gun turret is obscured you will hit the ground upon launch.
They nerfed this a while ago.
So realistic.
My point is implementing kinetic force to destruct vehicles instead of penetrating them.
Sherman 105HE shells would be able to pummel panther crews to death then
already possible. But then you should be able to destroy a vehicle by not penetrating it but with the sheer amount of kinetiv energy of the impact, even tho it says “no penetration”.
Actually I don’t want this to happen. Just stop nerfing certain vehicles by “realistic” standards while you do not apply this method to the entire fleet of available vehicles in the game. And if you do so, pls stop calling it “realistic” but a simple “nerf” for what it really is and nothing else.
1 Like
the Tiger manual said that
4 Likes
All vehicles ingame are modelled to their theoretical maximum power output. But the King Tigers now should get the “save mode” implemented?
Guys, you still don’t get my point. Either model vehicle specific weaknesess for ALL vehicles ingame, or to NONE. But do not nerf vehicles in a specific property where they already do not excel at all, while this property is the most single most important one in the entire game (mobility)
3 Likes
600hp is its theoretical max because the engine is limited to 2500RPM
there is no safe mode
every engine that had a govenor has that modeled
4 Likes
? You need to bind View from ATGM sight (or something), it switches the sniper view to the ATGM
Also the HE on the BMP-3 is incredibly strong AND it has a 4 second reload, for whatever reason a lot of people ignore it when it’s a guaranteed one shot kill if you know weakspots. In addition to the fact that the HE is extremely low velocity to the point that you can sit behind a hill or small ridgeline firing shots at people, whilst it is an impossibilty for them to fire back and hit you. The fact the BMP-3 can face leopard 1s or even light tanks such as the M551 (which has a 12 second reload for a similar HE shell and no laser rangefinder) extremely unfair in my opinion. Personally I’ve had no issues with the long atgm reload, as if someone starts to push me I just change to HE.
If the 34kmh max speed is in the manual then I don’t see an issue.
1 Like
If a tank gets hit by a 155mm HE the crew is just dead and the tank flys a few meters backwards. (Atleast what my dad told me from his bundeswehr days back in a m109)
sustained 2500, short time max 3000. And since every vehicle drive around with their max output, so should the king tigers.