Because they are diffrent, the Swiss Premium isnt an Early one but an Late one just with nerfed loudouts
Vehicle : Yak-9K
Gamemode : Ground RB
Change : 4.7 —> 5.3 or 4.7(Remove APHE)
Reason : The NS-45 APHE carried by the Yak-9K is too powerful and disrupts the match, either the BR needs to be increased or the APHE removed.
18 Likes
Your argument is, they arent good at 7.3 because of heavy and medium tanks, as such you want them at 6.7/6.3, where EVEN MORE heavy tanks are?!
2 Likes
Mode: Air RB
Plane: JAS39C (All)
BR: 13.7 → 14.0
Why? Good FM, good Missiles, alot of CMs decent CAS Options
Me when the light tank doesnt have the firepower of a heavy tank because its a light tank
I think you are forgetting that its tied for least armed 13.7 in the game
I thing you forget with the 14.3 BR, at 14.0 it remain the same MM not Top top, but close
Why would the Begleitpanzer go up in br? It was fine at 9.3 and had a lineup (wich it doesnt have at 9.7). 9.7 also constantly faces uptiers to 10.7 where it has no place. Its performance is not op in any way and it still doesnt have its apfsds or irst, if it got those i would be all for a uptier even one to 10.3, but in its current state i cant see any reason why.
yes but gripen is not 13.7 worthy. It doesnt have alot of missiles like the f15s nor does it have good missiles like the mirage 2000. if U want the gripen up you would also need to move the j10 up
Will you do something about the STA-A1 tanks? It’s worse than the M36B1 in every way, except for the armor, but the armor on the STA only protects against small-caliber anti-aircraft guns. The M36B1 is faster, because of the padded armor, the bunks fly on departure, the guns are the same, the reloading is about the same, it is more comfortable, more mobile, it also dies from machine guns and aircraft cannons, but the combat rating of the M36B1 is 5.7. Can the STA-A1 be put at least 6.0? The STA-A1 is now a complete mess and meat for any tank on its combat rating
Sure, while they cannot penetrate medium or heavy tanks, they can suppress enemy light tanks at this BR. Additionally, the DM63 has a higher anti-air effectiveness.
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
No, I am not complaining about them being helpless when fighting against heavy tanks. But, by lowering their BR to 6.7, they can do more tactical things, like restricting enemy light tank routes, spotting enemies, and capturing zones. These things are what Germany’s 6.7 lineup lacks most
Venom FB.4 8.7 → 8.3
Would be a good start, its a shadow of its former self. Not many people play this plane anymore.
Performance is at best on par with other 8.3’s.
Shenyang F5 9.3 → 9.0 Same here, would be a good start. Has PL-2’s and an afterburner, but otherwise its a MiG-17. Doesnt deserve to fight MiG 21 SMT/MF or other 10.3’s.
4 Likes
Or maybe, against the background of changes in the T30, a tank like the M728 should have its recharge reduced, or its combat rating reduced? Otherwise, he doesn’t feel comfortable at all on 7.0.
There’s a reason nobody plays these planes. They’re just as vulnerable to everything else, which includes stuff like J-7D which can actually catch up to them and has PL-5B/PL-7 with much greater range.
We also still have Su-25 and A-10A which are both 10.3 in RB. What 9.3 is gonna be dodging 30G R-60M and AIM-9L?
Both of those have better cannons, gunpod options, and better CAS loadouts that aren’t sharing missile pylons.
Just compare these loadouts:
Su-25 (10.3)
A-10A Early (10.3)
Alpha Jet TH (10.7)
There’s no competition. Six dumb bombs or a few rocket pods cannot compete with GBU-8s, AGM-65s, Kh-25Ls, or S-25Os. Not to mention the other stuff that the A-10A and Su-25 get in 2-3-4x the numbers that Alpha Jet TH gets.
If you’re looking for 9Ps, you can find them in RB at much lower BRs. Same with R-60Ms. Even if your problem is all-aspect there are a few, and the 9P-4s are very bad as far as “all-aspect missiles” go, it has about the same range and less load factor limit than R-60M, which can do limited all-aspect.
I just feel 9Ls to be more flare resistant. On F-5T I have been using them instead of Python 3s for this reason, Python 3s fall for pretty much any decoy attempt but 9Ls will often ignore it and keep tracking the enemy.
And those are regarded as massive problems for their BRs.
What’s a faster, more nimble jet with 4 all aspects instead of 2 going to be at 10.3? I’ll let you figure that out- fyi, its not “balanced”.
Plane’s BRs in ARB should be decided by how effective they are against other air vehicles, and the Alpha jet TH is very strong and would be ridiculously overpowered at any lower BR.
Sure, you may think it’s overtiered because of its lack of bombs, but you must realise at 10.3 nobody is going to use it for bombing, they’d rather terrorise people with good flight performance and 4 all aspect missiles with decent range.
The Tiger 2 changes are not apparent to me, as the specifications of 600hp refer to an engine speed of 2500 rpm, which was considered economical.
However, the engine itself has a maximum of 3000 rpm (which is also noted in the source for the Sla 16), where the power is correspondingly higher. (My books give a maximum of 680 and 700 hp here).
edit: found the respective bit in the Tiger Ausf B handbook, that has the limiter, this was moved in comparison to the Tiger E handbook that was used as reference for the changes to the B models (in the Report).
The changes for the Sla 16 also make even less sense. According to the source, the power is reduced here: At the crankshaft, without fan, 750 hp @ 2000 rpm.
2 Likes
The engine had a factory standard limiter which limits it to 2500rpm in every tiger
Thus reducing its maximum HP to 600
Vehicle: Vidar
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 8.0 → 8.3
Laser rangefinder and great termals for 8.0? This tank is OP here
Vehicle: PzH 2000 and PzH 2000HU
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 7.7 → 8.0
Laser range finder on 7.7, it also has very fast shells and the fastest reload among others listed here
Vehicle: PLZ05
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 7.7 → 8.0
Laser rangefinder and spall liner on 7.7? It has also very fast shells. It also has controlled suspension, which allows it to get something other howitzers don’t have… depression.
Vehicle: 2S19M1
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 7.0 → 7.3
It may have slow reverse, but it also has quick reload like all of other above it and it has fast shells too.
Vehicle: 2S19M2
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 7.3 → 7.7
Same here, but this one has even quicker reload
Vehicle: Type 99
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 7.3 → 7.7
Very fast shells, mobile, quick reload
Vehicle: AuF1
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 7.0 → 7.3
Quick reload, HE-VT is slow but normal HE is quite fast
Vehicle: Sholef
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 7.3 → 7.7 (move from rank IV → V)
It has Merkava Mk.1 chassis, so for this BR makes it very survivable and quite mobile. Has quick shells (HE-VT too).
ALL of them are mobile (at least forward, some of them have same mobiity forward and backwards).
MAYBE those should go even higher, because those all have laser rangefinder:
- Vidar : 8.0 → 8.7
- PzH 2000, PzH 2000HU and PLZ05 : 7.7 → 8.3
10 Likes