Su 33 is flown by noobs with GE lmao
Su-33 has fox-1s and less countermeasures
Still not to discredit the noobs that ruin its stats. I love the Su-27 and the 33 is a direct upgrade to it.
literally carries 8 R27ERs which are some of the best missiles in game and are the only ones that can comepete with FOX-3s and it fights F4 phantoms from vietnam massive cope all it needs is more flares and it can be 13.3
Kugelblitz
7.0 → 6.7 or 6.3
it is a slow SPAA with a pz 4 chassis that faces jets in most matches
cannot shoot them down effectively so that role is obsolete.
It used to have a full HVAP belt (which the Zerstoerer 45 now has) which it lost due to it being too strong at tank-killing.
*cough cough, ZSU-57-2 aphe
The kugelblitz in its current state is never used, it is unable to fulfill its role as an AA at 7.0 and is unable to kill tanks due to the heavy presence of WW2 and cold war heavies.
12 Likes
do you know what’s more concerning than the Su-33? the fact that the MiG-29G which is worse than the Su-33 and Su-27 in every way is at the same br.
yeah thats why im saying su33 should be upped it has no reason to be its br
F14B is same br and has no irrcm a worse FM and worse radar missiles
Yeah idk what hes on about, im by no means a expert for air, im very average yet im going 95 deaths and 184 air kills in my Su-27 which is a worse Su at the same BR as the 33, 2 less missiles, worse agility, and weaker engines.
The Su-33 looks worse via statshark but level 6 noobs can instantly biy it and play without knowing what they are doing.
Compression is very balanced and fun -Gaijin probably
2 Likes
should be 7,7 why is it fighting stabilized tanks at with same gun or better
1 Like
Air Simulator - F-111A:
10.3 → 10.7/11.0
Currently this aircraft is absolutely dominating every single 10.3 max lobby and there’s very little the red team can do to stop them winning the game through suicide rushing airfields. It also has MAWS which makes missile launches from much of the lower hemisphere useless due to the large calibre countermeasures it carries. A more fair BR IMO would be 11.0 as it is worse than the Tornado GR.1/early IDS models in A2A armament and performance, but makes up for it with much higher carrying capacity and MAWS protecting the aircraft.
1 Like
Hu?
Its not.
AV-8B+ is going to 13.3 in AB, which is the same BR as the SU-33, but is staying 13.0 in RB
Gun and mobility, main problem is compression, its a solid tank but its so compressed it can really suck fighting LRF tanks with stabilizers.
Again Gaijin refuses to up the BR’s by 5 levels because muh que times
oh i didnt see that yeah
Vehicle: PT-16/T14
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 10.7 → 10.7
OR
Vehicle: PT-16/T14
Gamemode: Ground RB
Change: 10.7 → 11.0
Reason: PT-16/T14 doesn’t really have anything going for it going to 11.0, it still uses dm23, no laser rangefinder, no thermals, so unless at least two of such things get added to it, it shouldn’t be moved up
that is not true the su27 is 2 tons lighter and has better agility and TWR because of that
they basically use the same engine
I never realized its that good. I own the PT-16, but rarely played it after spading. What makes it better or comparable to a Leopard 2A4?
Do they, my bad then, not that im getting into dogfights lmao. Still the ability to carry 6X R27ER and 2X R27ET is a major advantage. I tend to still clip most Aim 120 players since the R27’s have such good range, having more missiles just means more kills then for me and far more chances to mess up and still have enough missiles to retry after needing to defend.
Funny thing about the PT-16/T-14 is that according to the modification screen it only has a normal rangefinder, but when you go in the test drive it functions exactly like a laser rangefinder.
The 4 second autoloader, it’s legit a lower BR Type 90.
1 Like
it’s basically an leopard 2k hull, which is worse armoured but faster, and the whole tank revolts around that 4 sec autoloader and thats it, but no thermal, no laser rangefinder and only dm23 aint gonna cut it at 11.0