They should fix the damage-free bullet bug, and then give the HEATs consistent damage. Then they should give the tanks the bullets they’ve historically used. Then they can put the M51 at Br 7.0, since it would be a balanced tank in terms of having no armor, low mobility, and a slow-firing bullet, but it would kill everything in its path with the first shot.
wat do?
perhaps… if nobody agrees with you… you could be wrong?
my m2k disagrees
1 Like
it could also be solved by upping the nf5a to 11.0 because its a straight p2w upgrade compared to every other 10.7 f5
1 Like
Thats not even remotely what i am talking about.
yeah i know, its still incredibly unfair that the nf5a is p2w
(maybe i shouldnt have responded to you tbh, my bad chief)
They could show us their data and explain their positioning. They dont do that however.
Mode: Naval AB
Vehicle: Shimakaze
BR Change: 5.0 → 7.7
A vehicle that can launches tons of long lance torpedos capable of ending battleships in one shot, the ironic thing is that it does better against battleships than destroyers who can easily dodge their torpedoes.
The ship should be 7.7, therefore pitted against ships that has a realistic chance of dodging the torpedoes or absorbing some of them.
1 Like
Vehicle: Sabra Mk.I
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
BR Change: 10.0 → 10.0
Reason: M60 AMBT is staying at 10.0 (you get a LWS, marginally better traverse rate and 0.7s extra reload speed when aced on the Sabra but have less engine HP and no 25mm RWS, relatively equal performance in different ways)
On top of this, at 10.3 it moves alongside the 120S at 10.3, a Patton variant with an Abrams turret (infinitely more survivable) better round and with a 5s aced reload, a further second faster than the Sabra. Makes no sense at all to say it’s outright better than the AMBT let alone equal to the 120S which trounces it in every conceivable measure except not having a LWS.
2 Likes
Meanwhile the F-16D with 3x the countermeasures, a much better radar and a full HMD for both IR and radar missiles at 13.3:
Yes, doing that for dozens of vehicles just to satisfy a random on the forum blabbering about something he has little idea about doesn’t seem very realistic.
Also, SS shows a pretty decent picture and even if Gaijin decided to publish stats, you can’t be sure that data haven’t been tampered with before publishing, just to suit their narrative.
Vehicle: Merkava Mk.2D
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
BR Change: 10.0 → 10.0
Reason: Identical tank to the Merkava Mk.1B (and 2B) in overall performance which both sit at 9.7. Only difference is the addition of some composite screens on the 2D. It can be justified that this deserves it to sit at a BR step higher (at 10.0) but this is such a minor difference to any sort of realistic survivability to anything except some HEAT/HEATFS shots that in no way is it two BR steps higher in performance. It will not stop missiles at its tier, and APFSDS is essentially unaffected (both far more prevalent on anything except some stock vehicles).
1 Like
There are countless replies talking about the Mk.2D if they really dont wanna change the br after all the feedback then it should kinda be their job to at least respond. especially when they act like they take feedback etc.
Holy cope. The Jaguar IS is incredibly easy to fly and do well in and you want to give it a full BR drop?
what skill issue is this?
These BR change threads are absolutely hectic with some ridiculous takes.
This whole format is flawed, as opinions of people with unchecked skill levels are still accepted.
3 Likes
Again, responding to every feedback is just unrealistic thing to do. They do take feedback as shown with BMDs, but that feedback must be at least semi sane.
1 Like
It only took me the 191 games I have in the Jaguar IS to fully ace the crew for free and to grind like 2 million RP to get me to the Typhoon, I really don’t understand how people can do poorly enough in it to think that it needs to move down.
But yeah I agree that the format is flawed. I’m happy that Gaijin usually ignores a lot of the changes people request.
1 Like
Please reduce all is-2 variants in br by 0.3
2 Likes
13.7 then, too close to the F-16AM or A OCU.
The regular ADFs are 13.3 on the pretense they don’t have IRCCM. Also comparing an F-16 to a harrier isn’t remotely fair.
it just need a reload buff and 12,8/8,6 pzgr. TS
Air Realistic
F-104G (China)
10.7 → 10.3
10.7 Despite having only 4 missiles compared to the F-104J the Same flight model at 10.3.
5 Likes