Doesnt change that the Bagel is obnoxiously op at 9.3…
Compared to vehicles that should not have a buffed RoF:
- T-34 1940: 7.1s → 12s
- T-34 1941: 6.9s → 11s
- T-34 1942: 6.5s → 10s
The PT-76 used to have a 10s or longer historical reload. Why does Gaijin think, a 1940 based tank with the same two man turret should somehow have a better RoF than a 1950s light tank, using practically the same cannon?
The T-34 was known for their low RoF, due to small, cramped turret, with the commander serving as the loader and only periscopes to aquire targets.
The same story with the KV-1. Except for the KV-1S, the turret design was very poor.
Again the reload rate should be at least 10s. With the exception of the KV-1S, which has an actual “modern” three man turret, with a cupola for the commander and a loader that can easily load rounds into the breech.
Likewise the KV-2 reload buff makes like no sense. It’s a meme vehicles. Buffing the reload to some unrealistic level, potentially raising the BR in the process, makes no sense.
It shouldn’t be an effective vehicle, that’s the whole point of it. You hit, you kill, but then you better get into cover or have support.
8 Likes
Guess the point is that those missiles are f*cking OP for 10.3.
Ok but they are available at 11.0 why call them 12.0 missiles lmao
yeah, more vehicles should get APDS/APFSDS and get higher BR. HVAP is pain.
Ofc thats the problem, not that those missiles are OP at 10.3 or that those two planes are destroying flareless 9.3 planes, the problem is that I wrote 12.0 instead of 11.0.
they serve as underwing pylon decorations for me at 12.7
2 Likes
Its a compression problem if anything, SU-25 doesnt belong at 10.7…
Once again, and I hope for the last time on this forum: Attack aircraft are not supposed to be competitive with fighters in Air RB. That is not their purpose and never has been. They are meant to destroy ground targets, not to be the best fighter against aircraft that are decades older.
1 Like
So how do you spade them then?
If we reduce the reload of the sturer Emil, you should also reduce the reload of the Maus/E-100.
Maus turret has a better ammo layout AND 2 loaders, while Emil got not much space and just 1 loader. That doesnt make much sense.
So proposed change:
E-100/Maus reduce (aced) 18,2 secs → 12.3 secs.
If 1 loader with bad space, can reload a two piece ammo in 12,3 secs, 2 loaders with more space should at least do the same.
P.S. Can we talk about, how the crowded Obj 268 reloads a 152mm 2 piece ammo gun, with 1 loader faster, than the 2 loader spacious 128mm gun carriers. (17,1 sec)
4 Likes
Ground RB. f someone takes an attack aircraft into Air RB, they should expect to be an easy target, not the best fighter.
ground pounding?
grb rewards are ass bro
Yeah, and for an attack aircraft to be the best fighter in almost every match isn’t normal, not even in the game. I would assume a reasonable person would expect that an attack aircraft isn’t going to be the best fighter. If someone buys an attack aircraft expecting to massacre old fighters, then something is seriously wrong with this game.
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: F-5E
BR Change: 11.3 → 11.0
Reasoning:
- First, it has no ground ballistics computer, which also means you can’t use it’s mavericks as effectively since you can’t use target points and have to aim with your nose.
- Second, it’s at the same br as jets like the F-4E which is stronger in every way except for maneuverabilty. It’s also at the same br as much stronger F-5Es like the Thais which actually have ballistics computers and much better AAMs, and even the Swiss one with a much better radar for locating enemy aircraft. Even the A-7K has better armament at a lower br.
I could even see a case for it going down to 10.7 so it could actually have a line up, and there will still be stronger options for air to air and air to ground like the F-4J and A-10A respectively, i mean even the NF-5A has better performance at a lower br.
1 Like
They already have since quite some time.
? are you dumb. I can cant count how many times someones rushed in a puma just to spawn a do 335 or 50mm 262. Every nation has a fast tank, dont go bumbling on about how slow the tigers going to be when the american tanks at the br were slower than the tiger 2 (m26, t26e5, t30, t34, so on). Speed isnt everything, german teams just dont play the objective, and i would know as ive ground the german tree (was my first or second tree back in 2016 or so) and i gave up solely because the teams were so insufferably bad. And it hasnt changed.
i like the tiger buffs.
they will still be undertiered as hell btw
1 Like
Z47 4.7 →4.7
It only has HE shells!!! And that’s why it could be 4.7 instead of 5.0.
And also, this is the 3rd “Italian F86 BR joke Case”, due to a small group of players using it pretty well…
5 Likes