Planned Battle Rating changes for August 2025 (updated 16:00, 15.08)

Or…

Im going to say words that will get me banned… :P

They need to fix and buff HESH

7 Likes

Its just another example that Gajin is often reluctant to up BRs of comparable russian units. 2S38, Sprut, some of the BMP, BMDs… this class should be higher BRed.

Also the SKR-7 frigate is still not up BRed with the upcoming patch. Despite it wrecks naval modes. Comparable frigates indeed got a BR bump to 4.7. But not the russian one, which always had been the most op one.

Yes it is devastating as it should be. it is a 152mm after all. Devastating with a lot of energy capable of destruction but as mentioned it is a 152mm in two part shells… the reload should be closer to 40-45 seconds. There is no way anyone can reload that shell under 30secs and keep repeating the same process for the duration of battle due to fatigue…

Or make it like IRL where you had to elevate the gun everytime for a reload therefore it took more than 40 seconds… 33 seconds is already a generous reloading time without the limitations… so anything under 30 seconds is just a silly prank… I can not comprehend how can reload reduction be even discussed…

1 Like

Pls tell me its a joke

bruh what do you mean T30 is flat out worse than T34 and T29. Yeah, you can get 6 kills. After waiting 3 millennia for the reload to finish. Your AP pen is barely average (and borderline useless front on at 7.7); your HE is great but the M109 reloads in half the time you do (and gets proxy and a lower BR). Your armor isn’t that great, since long 88s, French autoloaders, and every heat shell you see eats you alive. T29 and T34 are just better, I mean the reload and the lack of that 3rd 50 cal really brings it down.

Certainly, you can have fun and do well, but it’s frustrating at times.

or… FV4005 to 3.7/4.0… where other goof machines like it sit.
(srsly though the KV-2 is better than the 4005)

3 Likes

Hell nah its op in downtiers its fine on 8.7

My results with T30 are better than in my T34 and nearly on par with T29 but I do not care anymore… T30 is really strong and it will get OP if this goes live…

Would be fun. But HESH is too OP for that clearly

And they openly mock us for HESH being “underutilised”

6 Likes

Ok but like WT isn’t a realistic war sim. You know that right? The Sturm tiger IRL reload was like over 3 minutes, but somehow in game its 50 seconds? Should we change that? The Ho-Ri literally never existed. The E100 (in its current config) is literally impossible irl. Obj 292 (as far as its shell characteristics) is literally an estimation (we literally don’t have access to those irl stats).

T30 and KV-2 are receiving these buffs because they’re flat out less competitive than their counter parts in the tech tree. They’re not necessarily terrible, but there is no reason to play KV-2 when the SU-152 and ISU are easier to play. There is no reason to play T30, when M109 reloads in half the time, and T29 and T34 are WAY better. It may not be historical, but its needed for them. I almost never see T30 get played, and if I do its because Im playing it.

2 Likes

Yes we should change those too, we have been building and trying to steer the game as close as possible to reality for many years, since 2013 just to see it being destroyed step by step… I do no care anymore, just cater to the statistics and whining there is no point trying anymore.

They are nice vehicles and should stay that way…do not bring them more “in line” or they will loose their originality

If you really need faster reloading T30 then add T30E1 with assisted loading system, that should bring the reload under 20secs…
I play my T30 and I often see them on the battlefield, she is a beast. Bring the artificial buffs then or just shorten the reload of all guns to 5 secs so we can stop caring… so we can stop caring if something is or is not physically possible then…

If they go about it this way, nothing will ever stop, people will just cry for more and more reductions for their vehicles and eventually it will just loose it’s essence

FV4005 suffers because HESH in game is awful. every HE machine is better. If HESH as it is IRL is implemented, I’d wager the 4005 would go back up in BR because it would hull break literally everything it sees. The gun literally broke the Conquerors UFP. I don’t think people understand how insanely overkill the 183 was. Every vehicle it was tested against suffered some sort of catastrophic damage that would have at least put it out of the mission if it didn’t outright destroy the vehicle.

5 Likes

Really when I refer to teamwork, I mean that the players have a minimum of sense when it comes to covering the map, otherwise things like with the M18, or like the Fox that had its Br raised simply because it flanked and killed a lot of enemies.

Definitely worthy of a “hit” in game, if the snail is feeling nice you might take out 2 crew.

2 Likes

It’s worse than the T-55A and that thing isn’t op in a 8.3 downtier

All F-5A variants does not have access to 60+30.

All F-5s with the AN/ALE-40 skin mount dispensers should have access to the same loadouts. Whether 30 regular + 15 large countermesaures are better than 60 regular is a debate in itself. Perhaps that is a superior loadout if it can get the possibility to discharge 1 large flare per use?

1 Like

Or sometimes you’ll just randomly non pen a Tiger 1s front plate somehow

1 Like

Ah yes, lets move the Pt16 a vehicle that has no thermals and dm23 goes to 11.0 to face top tier is a shit decision and the AGS with M774 becoming a top tier vehicle is a weird decision. at least give it M900 then. also the PT14 give it thermals then

3 Likes

“these tanks are very weak” lmao yea right