It’s already OP at 10.7, but I think a BR change would be better for it rather than nerfing something that made it different.
(NAB) Saeta 4.7 > 4.3 (an outdated boat considering how many SKRlikes have been introduced at 3.7-4.0, which will easily destroy it). All its counterparts sit at 4.0-4.3 and also have torpedoes.
1 Like
(NAB) Freccia P-493 4.7 > 4.3 – similarly, the additional gun does not provide an advantage, and it is rarely encountered in battles.
1 Like
(NAB) MPK Pr.11451 4.7 > 4.3 – an unjustified BR increase; its maneuverability is impossible due to the poorly implemented hydrofoil, just like all ships with hydrofoil (it tilts forward when turning, whereas videos show that the stern should tilts and the turning radius should be smaller, with less speed loss during maneuvers). On half of the maps, it immediately runs aground, and its torpedoes in current realities cannot even sink a corvette. You can’t just rely on one speed.
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Tiger II (P)
BR Change: 6.7 > 6.3
Reasoning: There is no point having it at 6.7 since the Tiger II (H) has way better Armor at the same BR, the Tiger II (P) can easily be disabled by guns of even lower BR, the Turret has only around 100mm Armor at the central portion of the curve. The same gun is also featured on several vehicles on even lower BRs with little Armor and mostly way higher mobility to stay alive. The Tiger II (P) can easily be disabled by most vehicles it faces frontally.
4 Likes
Also worse turret armor, the basic BMP-2 is resistant to 50 cal but the 2MD which needs to get on the side can be nuked by any 50 cal.
Also heavier and slower than the BMP-2
All around just a worse BMP
1 Like
Hunter F.1 - ARB - 9.0 → 8.7
The worst Hunter in the game, yet sits at the same battle rating as the Swedish J34 Hunter which has more engine power AND missiles. Badly needs to come down in BR.
4 Likes
Venom - ARB - 8.7 → 8.0
Now that we have the Mig-15 and A-5 Sabre at 8.0, the Mig-15bis at 8.3, and the Mig-17 at 8.7, it’s time the Venom came down to a more sensible battle rating for it’s performance. Compared to other 8.7 jets it’s got appalling performance, and in a full up-tier it’s practically useless.
2 Likes
(NAB) USS Cyclone 3.3 > 3.0 (move from Rank V to Rank IV) – ineffective slow-firing guns with grenade launchers combined with his guns which wasn’t implemented, is easily destroyed by opponents with calibers of 40mm and above.
1 Like
(NAB) Richelieu and RN Roma 8.3 > 8.0 (or increased rate of fire) – they do not have advantages; they don’t survive long, don’t shoot often, and their guns are among the worst of all top-line battleships — honestly, even at 7.7 they would be much more viable given current implementation realities.
6 Likes
(NAB) HMS Tiger – keep at 5.7 (no advantages over Atlanta, which lives at 5.7 and is not affected). Fix its gun accuracy, which was set with a typo (0.5 instead of 0.25), in the last patch’s accuracy adjustments.
1 Like
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: M26 (regular Variant, any Nation)
BR Change: 6.7 > 6.3
Reasoning: The Pershing is nowhere near the performance of a Tiger II for example and sits at the same BR, also especially in the US Tree there is no point in playing it since you have the “Jumbo” Pershing with way better Armor and the Prototype (Premium) with the long 90mm at the same BR of 6.7. It doesn’t have the Gun, Armor and Mobility to justify beeing at 6.7.
8 Likes
(NAB) A2D-1 9.0 > 7.7 (this aircraft isn’t much better than the A-1H, which is at 6.3)
(NAB) Canberra B.Mk.2, Canberra B(I).Mk.6 – from 8.7, 9.0 to 8.3 (BR is overinflated; American Canberras are at 8.3; this change will give British aircraft to a set with Vanguard ship, which lives at 8.0)
2 Likes
(NAB) Ki-84 Hei 7.7 > 6.0, Ki-84 Otsu 6.3 > 5.7, Ki-84 Ko 6.0 > 5.3 – these aircraft do not have advantages in MAB; their BRs are overinflated for AA capabilities.
TAM 2C has literally 430 mm of pen with 105 mm dm63, has 6.1 sec reload only if aced, and to top It off its the worst light tank of its category at the br being outmarched by stuff like 2S25M wich yes has worst armor but better mobility and an insanely good 125 mm cannon with 3BM60, the only remarkable thing about the TAM2C Is the good resistance among light tanks but its still a light tank not an mbt
it will mog 3.3
(NAB) J2M5, J2M3, G.56 – from 6.7 > 5.7 – same as above
(NAB) J6K1 from 6.3 > 5.7 – same as above
(NAB) Tu-4 from 8.0 > 7.7 – similar to B-29 with comparable payloads that actually live at BR 7.0
1 Like