Glad they cancelled the VFM5 BR change. Who was even using it? Even when I’m playing 10.0, I’d rather use Falcon, ZA-35 or ZT3A2.
1 Like
What did you do with PT 16/T14? It would be unfair to put it at 11.0!
It is so obvious that Su-30SM is way better than F-15E. You have 12 R-77-1 which is much better than AIM-120 and explode multipath player much better. From what I can see, on your statistic profile, you do much better with Su-30SM and below average with F-15E?
2 Likes
It’s quite insulting seeing vastly inferior tanks going up in BR, while my beloved 279 stays at 9.0. If you’re doing statistics based balancing, why is the 279 staying 9.0 when its statistics show it is eating good at both down-current-up tiers. I want it 9.3, so i can pair it with 2x BMD4 and others. Edit: lol, nvm, they’re moving BMD4s to 9.7. Surely, they keep the 279 paired up with BMP3… move 279 to 9.3, come on.
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Saab F 35
BR: 10.7 → 9.7
Reason it only has 2 missiles and only dumb bombs at a BR where we have AGM slingers with thermal pods
1 Like
WAKE UP FAM, Chinese TTS is still not worth using, but least it gets a good round now.
I have already suggested that the J-8B be moved to 10.7 where it belongs.
Vehicle: A10c
Mode：Air Realistic Battle
BR: 11.7→11.7.
With 2 9m s initially.
9l isnt that enough to get kill in 11.7, especially a10c using it. Even though when playing a10a s 9l. its not that useful due to a10 s low speed and weak menuover. So i suggest let a10c get 2 9m s when first buying it , or at least move it to I research. Or it will be painful grind
2 Likes
KT 10.5 masterrace
You’re happy with this, but have issues with the Beglite going up? Biased much?
1 Like
The only 8.0s with a laser are the SPHs that belong at 8.7 anyway. As for the armor thing, plenty of other tanks have similar guns at 7.0 or even higher and do just fine.
They love leaving aircraft at this area with garbage stock grinds, JA37C is a different aircraft when it gets it’s radar missiles
LET THE BOI BE FREE FROM HIS HELL!! this thing should not be 11.7 dawg is just so bad
Vehicle: Buccaneer S.2
Mode: Air RB
BR: 9.3 to 9.0
Reason: Since the supersonic Yak-28B is to be lowered from BR 9.3 to 9.0, there is no reason to keep the unarmed Buccaneer S.2 in BR 9.3.
5 Likes
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Type 90/90B/90B Fuji
BR Change: 11.7 > 11.3 (No BR change)
Reasoning:
Type 90 does not have the armor to in comparison to tanks at 11.7 nor does it have the gun handling to boost. Being only 0.3, it’s more than likely to get sucked into the 11.7-12.7 bracket and lose all of it’s efficiently. Plus Fuji being a premium will mean probably less sales for you if it gets a bad reputation due to BR.
5 Likes
BlockquoteIn terms of thier in game efficiency values, the Swedish Strf 90C, as an example, requires a much greater increase than the 2S38.
im going to rewrite this in a nicer tone, so the 2s38 is somehow surviving another br change even tho its blatantly destroying 10.3 and you guys wont move it up because well obviously money, and none of you at gaijin play warthunder we all know this so dont lie. so elaborate why isnt the 2s38 going up in br in GRB? The strf 9040C has a ready rack of 24 vs the 2s38 that has (let me ready my notes) 128 rounds ready to go so what are you talking about. stop with the bullshit and move the damn thing up already and be done with it this game of cat and mouse is so annoying
3 Likes
Overall, yes, but the kit it has forces its battle rating to be higher than its actual capability.
@yotogani
The 2S38 was already moved up.
It didn’t survive any BR changes.
It’s no longer 9.7, stop pretending it still is; all 10.3 MBTs are vastly superior to it for a reason.
3 Likes
Mode: Ground realistic
Vehicle: BMP-2MD
BR change: 8.7 → 8.3
Reasoning:
BMP-2MD sits at same BR as Russian tech tree BMP-2 while having slightly worse mobility and no way of engaging heavy armor due to lack of ATGM. While high quality thermals are nice they certainly do not make up for loss of ATGM and there are some vehicles that have comparably clear thermal sight (at least for gunner) at BR of 8.3.
6 Likes
Nope. Unless they refine the airframe of the Su-27 then it stays the way it is perhaps decrease the amount of R-27 ers that it can launch. As for the F-15 A it can only launch Aim-7ms that is why it should remain at 13.0.