I’d take the TTD or the 2AV over the TURMS any day of the week
The better question is why the Merkava Mk.2D is moving to this BR as well lol
Mobility if i had to guess, people really don’t pay attention and let BMP’s get on their side, additionally the Begleitpanzer going up only made sense since both the Begleitpanzer and the BMP’s are the best IFV’s for their BR. Pretty solid vehicles all around. They’ll probably do fine and if not they’ll go back down.
Agree, AGS needs m900
3 Likes
Mode: Air Simulator Battles
Vehicle: IL-10 (all)
BR: 5.3 → 4.3
Reasoning: The IL-10, compared to other attackers around 5.3, is both slower and carries significantly less armament. It is much more comparable to attackers like the A-20G-25 or the SB2C-4 (though obviously not quite the same as either). These aircraft that are similar in capability sit between 3.0 and 4.0, so I think that 4.3 for the IL-10 would be reasonable.
Moving the Type 90s up despite having a significantly worse round, much worse armour than everything else, is certainly… A decision.
A pretty god damn terrible decision if you ask me. Are you at least maybe gonna give them the Type 10 round to compensate?
Compression is a great thing -Snail
2 Likes
Other than the Beglit, they were pretty well balanced.
If everyone is at the same BR, instant queue times. Doesnt matter if pre-WW2 biplanes are facing Gen 4.5 modern jets. The only thing that matters is having the shortest possible amount of time in queue :P
I could understand the BMD-4 going up, it’s got a better transmission.
But having only really 4 capable weapons to kill things is pitiful.
Just updated the reply O7
its not a ragebait dude, plenty of evidence of this
Id take my BMP over something like the RCV (9.0) or thr CV9030 any day of the weak. Poor firerate and mobility for the CV. And unstabilized, no therms, no lrf on the RCV.
Besides its pretty hard to do bad in the BMP with its cannon imo, apds is meh but its got enough shrapnel that half my opents cant see.
Several issues with these changes.
- What crack did the KV-2 loaders snort that they suddenly cut off 10 seconds of reload? Granted, the KV-2 is kind of ass at its own BR (its actual more successful in higher tier but yknow) but cutting it by 30 percent?!
- Why is the T29 reload being made equal to the T34? Its already lackluster compared to the Tiger 2 (which is still 6.7 for some reason). Its balanced enough as it is.
- Speaking of Tiger 2, if we’re going to apply maintenance limiters to engines, or achievable HP versus designed, are we going to do this for all vehicles? Cuz, I know for a fact the Maus never made 1200HP, I think it only ever hit 1080 HP (don’t quote me though). Several other engines in game make their designed output vs their actual one (Sturmtiger for example)
- Why on God’s green earth is the 2s38 not getting its RB BR moved up? Are we serious, Gaijin?
- RIP Begleit from my 9.3 lineup, they sacrificed you for more BMD sales.
- For the love of God, nerf the Yak9k.
- RIP low tier Britain
- RIP France #593089325078302872334897589
- Obj 140 nerf was unnecessary
- Ratel 90 did NOT need to be nerfed
- XM800 will be at BR 11.0 before GTA 6 at this rate.
Good things
ZA-35 nerf
T30 buff (huge for the 20 players who have it)
Decompression
USS Texas buff (huge for the 5 naval players)
But being equal to a beglit? Never. That’s why 9.3 is perfect for them.
t29 lackluster compared to tiger 2 p? tf are you smoking lmao
1 Like
Lackluster no, but roughly equivalent absolutely.
As far as I’m concerned the best thing to do would be to put them all at 7.0 with the 12.5s reload for all of them. Maybe leave the P at 6.7.
1 Like
auf1 to 6.3-7
No.
Stop right there.
All aspect missiles at 10.0 are criminal. They do not need an airspawn. Everything about these two aircraft is garbage except for strong cannons and blatantly overpowered missiles for the BR. I’d personally move them UP one more step.
1 Like