Those are 120s sparrows have larger fins
1 Like
I guess there you have it , real life proof that the RTAF F16 ADF uses Aim-120
good stuff, create a bug report with the picture mentioning the addition of AIM-120s to F-16ADFs and they should answer in no time, given the context. Even if the current Japanese tree doesn’t have the ADF variant.
Tag me if you make a report and need support with its spread
1 Like
Thailand currently doesn’t have an ADF in the Japanese tree
it only has OCU
welp, a future addition could be made in record time given its a C/P for the next update :P
Mode: Air Simulator Battles
Vehicle: Yer-2 (ACh-30B)(e)and Yer-2 (ACh-30B)(l))
BR: 5.3 (early) or 5.7 (late) → 4.3
Reasoning: The Yer-2 is easily the worst of the heavy bombers, and by an extreme margin. They are incredibly slow, with limited defensive armament (a single 20mm covers the entire upper hemisphere - it lists max depression at -30, that is only directly to the sides, and the single HMGs covering the front and lower rear have limited arcs of fire). While they carry impressive payloads (3x1000kg+8x250kg), they are barely able to stay airborne while carrying that payload, and since the 1000kg bombs are carried externally they even further reduce its already poor speed. At 5.3/5.7 the plane is basically worthless given other bombers (such as the Pe-8 at 5.3 in the same TT) are faster and better defended, while also being easier to fly and carrying equally impressive payloads. At 4.3 it would have a niche as one of only a few heavy bombers present, while still not being overly strong.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/EncZGk0S5TAR
here you go xd tell me what to add or modify
It could benefit from some documents tho but i guess i gotta ask GPT to search the web for those for me
1 Like
A-1a is even arguably a downgrade even to the tech tree one. Piranha has less range than aim9l and a-1a loses the great gun in return for adens which hurts your headon ability(not insanely important though). The only strength is having 8 napalms over 5 which is a big boost to grinding if left uncontested, but is it really that big of a deal to be only 0.3 lower than tornado ids which is much faster? Should definitely be the same rating as the tech tree one
1 Like
My answer would be to move them all up to 11.3, which should be the BR floor for 9Ls.
You’re cooking
done
Let’s hope we’ll get a new F-16 and a cool folder in the Thai subtree.
1 Like
Yeah. KV-220 is having a miserable time now with the addition of the premium tigers, which it struggles to pen with its meager 135mm of pen and no overpressure. 220 is not better than the Tiger E, and arguably not even better than the Tiger West/Ost. Putting it at 6.3 is insane. If anything it should go down
Oh My LORD. AGS getting moved up AGAIN without an appropriate round for it’s BR? I get that it can hull down with an autoloader but it’s only fair it gets to shoot a round at the very least a generation older than what it’s facing. Please reconsider @Stona_WT the AGS needs something fair to fight with!
2 Likes
Right, just ignore the total lack of weak spots.
yeah fingers crossed that the SNAIL looks at it xd
Whoopsie, to be completely fair aim-54s aren’t exactly your traditional fox 3 missile when comparing it to other fox 3s found in game.
BMD-4&BMD-4M
GBR:9.3→9.7
Should the BMD-4 & BMD-4M be equipped with 3UBR11 or M929 and 3UOF23 as compensation after the GBR upgrade?
At the same time, the BMP-2M and BMD-4M should use 3UOF21 , 3UOR7 , and 3UBR10 to replace 3UOF8 , 3UOR6 , and 3UBR6 , respectively, as the former are modernized versions of the latter with plastic driving bands.
1 Like
Mode: Air Simulator Battles
Vehicle: F-86K (all)
BR: 9.3 → 9.0
The F-86K is less maneuverable than nearly every fighter at its BR while also having decidedly mediocre speed. At 9.3 it is highly disadvantaged when compared to its competition, with aircraft like the CL-13B or even F-86F-40 being equal or superior in nearly every performance metric. At 9.0 its speed would still be somewhat mediocre, but most of the planes that would still match it for speed would be similarly lacking in maneuverability.
3 Likes
Navy：Sovetsky Soyuz
Change the AP shell charge type from A-IX-2 to TNT, as A-IX-2 was not popularized in the Soviet Union in 1928
Loading time: 2.1 rounds → 1.5 rounds. It has never had a complete turret, and considering its ammunition depot modeling is very small, its loading time should not exceed 1.5 rounds
The armor equivalent thickness coefficient was reduced to 0.85. The Soviet Union did not manufacture a complete 400mm armor plate, and Soyuz’s armor was made by splicing two pieces of armor together, resulting in an equivalent effect lower than the normal thickness
Increase the modeling of ammunition depots and the size of collision boxes, which should be at least equivalent to the current Yamato
The AP penetration coefficient has decreased to 0.91 because in reality it is a soft cap and its penetration ability should not be comparable to MK8 or Type91
At least two of the above suggestions should be implemented
5 Likes