Ki-44-II Otsu is a special interceptor version. If you want Ki-44-II with 2 x 7.7mm and 2 x 12.7mm then Ki-44-II Ko has to be in the game.
we in the high tier want decompression, since you don’t play it why do you even oppose it?
1 Like
Air realistic, all applicable tech trees.
F-15A/J
13.0 - 13.3
Reason:
Firing AIM-9Ms, this vehicle is inherently more powerful than the other vehicles of 13.0.
Examples: F-14B uses AIM-9Ls.
F-14A IRIAF is a significantly worse airframe exclusively carried by its F-90s.
JA37Di, a subpar airframe using an ancient RWR, having 2 Swedish 9Ls as backup to the missile that carries it: RB99 also known as AIM-120.
Sea Harrier FA2, a subsonic airframe that has to choose between more countermeasures with 4 9Ms and 2 AIM-120s, or 4 AIM-120s and purely BVR… as a subsonic aircraft.
1 Like
Literally did not oppose it, just pointed out that your reasoning is at best flawd and at worst outright based on false information.
Air realistic, Soviets.
Su-33
13.0 - 13.3
Reason:
Firing R-73s, this vehicle is inherently more powerful than the other vehicles of 13.0.
Examples: F-14B uses AIM-9Ls.
F-14A IRIAF is a significantly worse airframe exclusively carried by its F-90s.
JA37Di, a subpar airframe using an ancient RWR, having 2 Swedish 9Ls as backup to the missile that carries it: RB99 also known as AIM-120.
Sea Harrier FA2, a subsonic airframe that has to choose between more countermeasures with 4 9Ms and 2 AIM-120s, or 4 AIM-120s and purely BVR… as a subsonic aircraft.
1 Like
interesting, no idea what’s going on but just be against it.
Merkava 2D 9.7 → 10.0 (Realistic Battles) + Addition of M428 SWORD
DM33 at 10.0 for a vehicle as fragile, lacking gun handling, having a slower reload rate and worse optics (and thermals) than most other vehicles at 10.0 is completely unreasonable. M428 SWORD will help balance out the Merkava 2D at its new BR so it doesn’t become a peashooter yet again.
4 Likes
Why? The thing still can’t see night battles so what good is Night Vision?
Eh… It’s more of on par with the Tomcat B in terms of being the worst at 13.0. Sure, everything here:
is true, but it’s also got some really good upsides that make these downsides not as bad. I think comparing these 2 from the perspective of how you would play an F-14 doesn’t work. For example, the Viggen is one of the fastest planes on the deck in terms of acceleration (even without afterburner). It has tons of CMs to go with that. It’s supposed to be played like a 1 and done brawler. Go fast, stay low, easily survive, and take out enemies quickly. It easily does well in that role.
Again, I literally have not said that i oppose it. I actually support it.
But it is not realistic. So maybe learn to read properly
Dupleix (French Bluewater Fleet)
Mode : Naval Realistic
BR Change : 5.7 > 5.3
Reasoning: Her penetration is the lowest(1km 149mm/10km 81mm) among all heavy cruisers, and her armor is very thin(60mm). It has no merits compared to other heavy cruisers of the same BR(BR 5.7 heavy cruisers average penetration : 1km 360-420mm/10km 150-240mm), also she can’t fight any cruiser of the same BR. Because she don’t have good penetration, and she isn’t tanky
And her sister ship Colbert is BR 5.3, and the difference in armor between the two ships is only 10mm (Colbert 50mm / Dupleix 60mm)
Dupleix is barely different from her sister ship Colbert and is vastly inferior to the other BR 5.7 cruisers, so her BR 5.7 is not reasonable
10 Likes
We need to seperate vehicles with APFSDS and laser rangefinder from vehicles that don’t have it. Especially 7.7 cannot play with 8.7 BR right now. It’s without any sense. But it’s good for the beginning.
I don’t even know if Iran knows the specs of it. There’s nothing online about it and they haven’t talked about it’s existence yet.
the OTOMATIC still need be 10.7
2 Likes
oh on top of all of this Bull dogs get better gun depression as well
Mr. @Smin1080p_WT , why is the Japanese UH-1B getting a non-historical modification, while other vehicles are not getting their historical equipment?
2 Likes
Please do so, Rapier isn’t gonna be any more useful there in its current state
Ofc it will not be the quickest, it will be the slowest with it’s 13.29 PtW ratio as it is the slowest tank even at 9.0 rn. I mean if driving average of 35km\h and losing all your speed by the slightest turn and getting your speed back taking ages is fine, then good for you
Would you guys explain why the fuck is the ZSD63 getting uptiered again for the umpteenth fucking time without a buff to the reload back to its old levels? like I can understand if it has a fast reload sure it deserves being 5.7, but ever since you lot started uptiering it over and over and over and over and still haven’t buffed the reload. I seriously question if you lot even play the game you’re making.
2 Likes
Ground realistic.
Leclerc.
12.0 - 11.7/11.3.
Reason:
Leclerc having ~550mm of turret armor, and ~300mm of hull armor, its armor profile is most similar to that of M1A1 seen at 11.3.
Both having engines of the 1500HP class, their mobility is going to be similar.
Both firing similarly performing rounds:
M829A1 performing 580mm flat, 670mm [335/cos60] at 1000 meters.
120 OFL F1 performing 557mm flat, and 644mm [322/cos60] at 1000 meters.
And both sharing similar fire rates: 5 second reload for Leclerc at all times, 5 seconds for M1A1 with ace crew, 5.3 with expert.
Thus the M1A1 and Leclerc should share similar BRs with the way current vehicles are modeled.
6 Likes