Vehicle: P-51D-30
Game mode: Air Realistic
BR change: 5.0 → 4.7
Reason: It get’s a bit more HP over other D series Mustangs, but it’s not that much to have 0.3 higher BR than supposed to be.
1 Like
You didn’t, others did. Hence what my posts were in response too.
1 Like
also, i dont know if moving it down would do it any favors. If you move it down, before any fighters could even reach it, they would bomb all the bases and then go onto the airfield, and game would be over before the props could even get them. people would just slowly stop playing that BR, and go play something where the B-29 was lord supreme
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Falcon
BR Change: 8.3 → 7.7
Reasoning : Take out APDS shell out of vehicle so they can goes down in BR for BR that Britain need 7.7 SPAA, it still have self-defense capability but not too good that make it a tank hunter instead of hunting Plane. (this also include AMX-30 S DCA for the same reason)
12 Likes
Ratel Family (realistic ground battles)
This wheelbase has too much low off-road maneuverability, which is why all these vehicles are on low BR.
I propose to remove or weaken the influence of off-road driving on mobility in exchange for an increase in BR
Ratel-90 6.3 > 7.7
(efficiency similar to Eland 90)
Ratel-20 6.7 > 8.0
(efficiency similar to Marder A1
Players are tired of playing against Milan ATGM on Tiger II)
Ratel ZT3A2 8.3 > 9.3
(fast ATGM with tandem warhead and 1200mm penetration, excellent thermal imager, currently BR is low only due to very bad off-road mobility)
3 Likes
Can’t say for sure, but T-72B with K-1 definetly should
dude doesnt need APHE, the solid shot honestly acts like APHE most of the time
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: TKX (P)
BR Change: 11.3 → 11.7
Reasoning:
The TKX (P) doesnt offer significant improvements over other vehicles at the BR, especially compared to those also found in the japanese ground tree. Compared to the Type 90/90(B), it has significant downsides for negligible advantages; The gun handling & performance is the exact same (depression, traverse etc.) but it has a lower ready-rack of 14 rounds, worse engine and power-to-weight ratio, also lacks significant armor-protection (given that people know to shoot the turret-roof and ring), with the only significant advantages being better sights, commander thermals and full reverse-gears.
That said, the advantages simply don’t make up for its’ downsides compared to the regular Type 90’s.
If this change was done together with an increase in Br of a lot of other 11.3 vehicles and a higher max GRB BR (decompression), then the change could be justified, however in it’s current form it doesnt make sense to move up the TKX(P), as it would essentially just end up being a filler for 12.0 lineups, while lacking most of the capabilites for being such.
10 Likes
Oh you’re right pal. I mentioned the Ki-44-II Hei but honestly all Ki-44s should be higher in BR
“B-but their armament could be weak” literally don’t care, they’re stronger than the Zeros
thats most vehicles in a down tier for you
Just means nobody will use it as the rest of the lineup isn’t effective essentially making the vehicles worthless, if only the T55 moved then fine but aiLV and strv are horrible
2 Likes
In my not so humble big headed opinion it should be 10.0. Especially as the 72B obr 1989 is at the same BR and that has far better armor than the B. If you ignore the poor ERA coverage around the gun (thats what bushes are for)
1 Like
The AP not the APDS is the thing it kills most people with… Same as the Gepard and others…
3 Likes
Leave the Type 81C at 11.3!!! What are these devs doing?! In what universe is the Type 81C 0.3 BR below the Pantsir with no radar and 6km missiles?!
9 Likes
Brother I have over a 3.0K/D in the T-55AM-1 and got 19 kills in an uptier (check my YT if you don’t believe me). Out of all these BR changes this should be the least concerning lmao, as much as I love it, it has to move up
2 Likes
Ground RB, C13 T90, BR 7.0→6.7, Cockerel’s 90mm HEAT shells are unreliable. Personally, it is less reliable than the 75mm HEAT shell of the BMP-1 (pbv501). Its shell has a vertical penetration of 250 mm and a low explosive charge, making it less stable than other M431, M348, and OCC 90-62 shells. If the opponent’s armor is sloped more than 100 mm, shells cannot penetrate and often do no damage. Should at least be the same BR as the AUBL-74, which has the same cannon.
2 Likes
You mean the ATGM that deals about as much damage as 75mm APDS?
so whats your YT?
Mode: Air RB
Vehicles: Mig15, F86A-5 (all nations) (8.0 —> 8.3) / Mig15bis, F86F-25 (and similar variants) (all nations) (8.3 —> 8.7)
Reason: Decompression of the 7.0 to 7.3 BR range, where early jets with minimum thrust and maneuverability are forced to fight mig15s and sabres. it’s a deathwish to jump into a plane at 7.0 and be met with already high altitude mig15s and mig15bis in something like the m262s, f80a5s, mig9s and other jets at 7.0 and 7.3. give them room to breathe, they do well enough at 8.3 and 8.7.
4 Likes
And AMX-13 and AMX M4 should stay at 6.7, there’s almost no line-up for France around that BR and their rounds will struggle above 7.0 in uptiers.
10 Likes