Ground RB
T-72A/T-72M1/ZTZ-96 9.3 → 9.7
With a 7.1 second autoloaded cannon with better rounds, and armor than anything at or around the BR I don’t see why these should stay at 9.3. Despite their max speed being lack luster, these vehicles get up to speed very quickly and only really lack a decent reverse speed. With better rounds and reload than MBT’s at and above it’s BR I don’t see why they should remain at 9.3.
why was there only a few vehicles got br change?
f-4f early
rb
10.7 → 10.3
reason: lack of flares
I would also like to ask if there will be a much more efficient way for players to report or suggest balance issues. The enthusiastic comments from players mean that in the past, it was difficult for them to provide feedback on the imbalance of BR balance through various channels, and every in-game change of mechanics or vehicle modifications or anything else will likely affect many vehicles at the same time, and only part of those affected vehicles/weapons/BRs will be fixed or adjusted after months or even years.
but in downtiers its a god, so they would rather have people suffer in uptiers then seal club in downtiers
i disagree, there is only 4 11.0 tanks and the puma with spikes.The 4 tanks are the chinese 11.0 that are like the T72, and the russian t90a which is 11.0.
None of those tanks change anything for the amx40, you fight t72s, t72bs, turms, t80ud when you get 10.3 uptiers and 10.7. Facing 11.0 is very rare and also doesnt change anything. ITs not like you will face leo 2a5 or something.
Also the 9.7 tanks and even 9.3 tanks can still deal with 11.0 tanks because they are almost the same as the 10.3 tanks which you can see when you play 9.3 france.
I dont understand the uptier, the only thing it really changes is you wont face 8.7 tanks if you get a full downtier. However since the 8.7 russia and sweden are moving to 9.0, youre still going to face what you used to in a full downtier.
If that happens the T-72Bs should go back down to 9.7 so they can snuggle with the T-64B.
considering that the AMX M4 has pen of a 105mm gun and is consistently a top scorer with most people having 3+ k/ds on it it can not be that bad. Honestly I already assumed it was 7.0
the AMX-M4 is amazing, and its my favorite french tank
T-69 is just as sluggish and doesnt get composite, which may save you from time to time while playing T-55
No changes in BRs for 2S38 and Ka-50/52s? They should go up as well.
The t72b has better armor than the t64b though. Ignore the stat card, look at the xray
Also the t72b has better armor that the t72a. The turms is an upgraded t72a with ERA (ignoring the thermals) and the b is a “new” T72 armor layout with ERA. So at least in armor its better than the turms.
You could argue the thermals is enough to make up for the armor and id agree as i love ESS - Thermal bait
Type 81 is much better than Strela.
Any plane can climb to space and sit there, untill match ends. It’s not just B-29 or bombers in general problem.
Don`t doubt it. As I said I already assumed it was 7.0 due to how often it kicks ass in matches
But it’s a 90mm with no APHE, which means no post pen damage and now on even better protected targets.
I get why it could go up, it’s a good vehicle, but not with a 7 second reload
just clarifiying, i didnt say the HAC didnt exist. But it doesnt exist in the way it has been added to the game. The game variant is fake, that is what we have reported as well
mig-23 BN
gamemode: all
change: ability to carry 2 R-13M and the belly flare pod
remove the r27er on the mig 29 and give it the r73.
Yeah that probably wouldn’t work either, maybe 10.0?