Kurnass 2000 still smae br as f16 :/
AMX-40 10.0 → 9.7
Same BR as Leopard 2K with better mobility, survivability, and better 20mm placement?
13 Likes
Just like Ka-52 and Mi-28NM, they only want to move helis with Fire and forget Missiles
2 Likes
you cannot move them down, as in a down tier, the would face 5.3 aircraft, and would be so high up that it would make games drag on forever. Bombers will pretty much always be janky in this game, and its difficult to really balance them.
tbf KV-1E already lacks firepower. Yes it’s jacked in armor but its gun is the early one, not the later one with more pen.
1 Like
q5L
changes: given teh ability to carry pl2 air to air missile
Air RB top BR 14,7 or something. And adjust thing from there. Anything else doesn’t say much.
3 Likes
Tiger HAC is better than the UHT, im really questioning why they didn’t put it in the list.
Sabra i can agree but merkava? Op? Giant cardboard with bad mobility?
4 Likes
Vehicle: T-72AV (TURMS)
Game mode: Ground RB
BR change: 10.3 → 10.0
Reason: It is in fact a 9.3 T-72A with thermals, 3BM42, useless K-1 ERA and with the same poor mobility and armor considered that it’s now facing even stronger opponents making it a glass cannon. It’s just have no place above 10.0 with it’s characteristics.
2 Likes
how is fox going to 8.0 yet scimitar stays at 7.7
I’m not mocking anyone, I’m just worried that Gaijin might take people seriously when they don’t even have an idea what the vehicle in question can/will face.
1 Like
They don’t belong in 10.0 where everything has thermals and is vastly superior to it
Fox is way faster, i think.
1 Like
A-5C
air rb
10.7-> 10.3
reason: 9.3 airframe at 10.7, the only thing it has going for it is magics, at the same br there is better aircraft than it
6 Likes
I’d like to see the QN506 moved down to 9.7 in GRB.
The SACLOS missiles are pretty much only good for light vehicles and SPAA.
The FNF missiles are a coin-flip on whether or not a they hit the hill front of the target or actually get a kill.
The gun has quite the spread so don’t even think about doing pin point shots.
The turret layout being what it is often lends one to self immolating quiet literally. Playing this vehicle you will find yourself running to a capture point because a nearby potshot blew up all your ammo.
All this to say it should go down in BR, in my opinion one of the worst top tier vehicles china has to offer.
9 Likes
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Aircraft: Mirage F1C/F1C-200
Change: 11.3→ 10.7
The Mirage F1C/F1C-200 lacks a digital RWR and precision strike capabilities. It also doesn’t have any usable semi-active radar missiles or a decent radar. Dodging the Super 530F missile only requires a light deployment of chaff—unlike the radar missiles on the F-4J(UK) and F-4S, which are much harder to evade. Furthermore, it lacks a helmet-mounted sight, making its performance in Ground RB even worse. Therefore, I believe placing the Mirage F1C/F1C-200 in the same BR as the F-4S and F-4J(UK) is appropriate.
7 Likes
I wish we got this type of response when it was asked why the B-26C wasn’t moved down alongside the B-26 in the US tech tree.
2 Likes
Yeah Merkava is OP, that’s why it’s moving up just like T-55s.
yea on a road maybe but ive had way better experience with scimitar on most maps since most flank routes arent roads