im sorry but 8.3 planes should not be seeing the ozelot.
some decompression would solve its problems
2 Likes
The ozelot is one of the worst SPAA lmao it was fine at 9.3, you can just pull a bit of G and dive down and the missile is defeated, and even if, there is still the ZSU with Iglas which are far more annoying at 9.3
people really playing japan 11.3 understand that with the tkx(p) you get much better thermals & reverse speed for a downgrade in armor, acceleration & ready rack size. its a sidegrade vehicle and wholly depends on personal preference.
for me the extra 4 rounds in the rack with the 90 is the most important perk.
i dont agree that they are going to raise the tkx(p), but not the type 90s. all of them are about equally powerful and can go up no problem.
1 Like
the ozelot isnt the worst spaa at all.
the iglas stingers are over nerfed Im aware but the zsu is still a far worse platform to be using.
the ozelot is fine at 9.7 like i siad, no 8.3 should be against that in all fairness.
1 Like
So ozelot is a problem but not the PGZ04, SANTAL or literally the Toyota with Stingers?.. Make it make sense, thanks
Exactly my point!
the TKX P loses more than it gains so its fair being the same BR, now they are saying the TKX (P) is as good as an M1A2 abrams…
BTW the Type 90 not moving up is a bit shoddy
2 Likes
ozelot has the best AA radar in the game together with the stormer hvm.
this is true for all spaa ir missiles, except strela, antelope & type 81. all of them are really easy to dodge from the front.
1 Like
Ozelot may have a good IRST but its still not good for 9.7 when the Gepard 1A2 exists with extra 35mm, im tryna get some logic here why SANTAL, Type 93 and PGZ04 are all fine at 9.3 but no the IRST is such a problem that ozelot needs to be a higher BR. Ive had more problems dodging the Type 93s and PGZ04s missile than when a stinger is fired at me
Did I say they should stay 9.3? no I didnt.
for a start
sental has under half the turret rotation speed.
has worse verticle guidance
no laser range finder
is larger
is wheeled so worse on more terrain and the mistral missile is about all thats better.
think its optics are worse too
Because it has far better tracking systems than all of htem? what is difficult to understand?
1 Like
If laser rangefinder is a reason for you on a damn manpad, then i see no point in talking to you anymore already
Its a statistical advantage that the ozelot has over the sental, thats all im listing mate.
Don’t get such an attitude over it
5 aircraft rank VII change BR (Air RB)
-
F-104G (AM & Luftwaffe) : 11.0 → 10.7
Lose AIM-9E and AIM-9J
-
J-7D : 10.7 → 11.7
PL-2 replace with PL-8, but lose PL-5B
-
Mirage F1C : 12.0 → 11.7
Removed R.550 magic 2
-
MiG-21Bis (FiAF) : 11.0 → 10.7
Change WVR missile R-60MK to R-60
-
MiG-21Bis-SAU & MiG-21Bis lazur-M (GDR) : 11.0 → 10.7
R-60MK replace with R-60
PGZ04 & zsu-23-m4 should go up to 9.7 as they have radars + good missiles + good guns.
sidam (mistral) is already at 9.7 with worse missiles, guns and no seach radar, but with a fast turret.
and gepard 1a2 should go to 10.0 its a direct upgrade to the stormer AD at 10.0.
beetween SANTAL, Type 93 & ozelot, ozelots missiles are easily superior of the three and it has the excellent irst radar on top. santal has the poorest missiles of the 3 and standard search radar.
ozelot is justifiably a br step above those 2.
1 Like
So you want the Gripen C to be .3 higher than the A in ground battles? Thats not really a good change, you essentially have 1 that has AGM65G and Fox-3 vs one that has AGM65A and skyflash. Thats not a good change imo.
It should go up if another 8.x vehicle takes its role for SPAA, T55 Marksman would be ideal but people will just use it like the Leo Marksman tbh.
1 Like
Without magic II and only rear-aspect Magic Is it would likely be more like 11.0/11.3 and even that would be pushing it
1 Like
BR 11.3 for Air AB, RB and SB or Air RB & SB only ?
Mirage F1C-200 and Mirage F1CT only with magic 2
I hope Mirage F1C limited rear-aspect Air-to-Air Missile
Yup but the veak isn’t bad either tbh
Vehicle: Sherman II
Game mode: all
Change: 3.7 → 3.3 or removed T45 APCR
Reason: Sherman II is identical to the American M4A1 counterpart in every aspect, except it does have T45 APCR shell which doesnt give it any benefit and serves as ‘dead weight’. Please consider moving it down or removing T45 shell to make it equal.
6 Likes