Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: KV-1S/KV-7(U-13)
BR Change: 4.0(revert the change) don’t move up
Reasoning:
these tanks has no business fighting against 5.3 tanks, the only good thing about them is their armor which doesn’t even help most of time and then you place them at 4.3 vs tanks like Panther D or ARL-44…
Mode: Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Turm III
BR Change: 8.3->8.7/9.0
Overperforms almost everything at the BR range, even though it should be easily oneshotted it just doesn’t, superior firepower with 105mm APDS with 5s autoloader and 30mm autocannon with SAPHE rounds.
T-80UD 10.3 → 10.7 its beyond me how this tank is still at the BR it sits at currently. A lot stronger than its peers on the BR and its definitely on par with something like a challenger DS
FV4030/3 ‘Shir II’
Mode: Ground RB
BR change: 10.0 (Proposed) → 9.7 (No change).
The FV4030/3 is a capable 9.7 tank, but it has no business fighting 11.0s unless it receives a better shell- at which point it is effectively the 10.3 Challenger 1. With the significantly stronger T-64B being at 9.7, I see no reason for the FV4030 to move up.
2S38 10.3 → 10.7 its beyond me how this tank is still at the BR it sits at currently. Especially disgusting in downtiers as it completely shreds the tanks frontally that it faces, which it shouldnt. The tank should reward playing as a flanker and not as a head on brawler which it is way too effectiv…
AMX-40 to 10.0… what a way to break 9.7 lineup…
agreed, kv-1 should be at 10.7
Leo A1A1 9.0 → 8.7. No LRF, no survivability, no TVD, ok mobility. It has no business being at 9.0, compared to what else is sitting on that BR
not high enough tbh
Уважаемые разработчики WAR THUNDER, прошу понизить боевой рейтинг китайского F104 до 10,7. У него нет ни лтц, ни нормальных лтх. Любая авиация с боевым рейтингом 10,7 перекручивает его, из стока его трудно вывести, это корм для противника. На 10,7 бесполезен. Прошу перенести его на 10,0 или 10,3.
Yea and namer 30 goes up to 11.0 for some reason
AMX-M4
RB 6.7-7.0
But it may need a change in reloading time, 6.5s or 6s instead the 6.7s now.
Mode: Air Simulator
Aircraft: MB.5 (UK)
4.7 → 5.7
Excellent speed, firepower, visibility, and ease of use thanks to contrarotating props. Its rarity is the only factor keeping it far below comparable aircraft like the Typhoon Mk Ib/L, Tempest Mk V, and Tempest Mk II which all boast similar speed, maneuverability, and firepower.
JH7 12.3 → 12.0 when the plane came out it was a worse Mig 23 ML and now after the FM nerfs of the Mig 23 its slightly better, it has the edge though with the missiles, but lacks a fox 1 option. 12.3 is obviously way too high of a BR. As it has a slightly better FM and better fox 2 missiles, I would…
yes please
Rooikat Mk1D 8.7 → 8.3
If it stays at 8.7 the dart should receive the long rod spall pattern. Right now it’s a 2kg dart that does less damage than autocannon APDS.
Mirage 2000CS4 12.3 → 12.7 if the Cs5 is now at 12.7 and doing okish there. Its basically the same plane - Maw but with a better CM drop pattern, as the Maw is useless in Air RB anyways and the Mirage 2000 Cs4 is a menace in the current MM, it doesnt make sense to leave that one there
T55 on 9.0 is ridiculous
Ground RB, VBCI-2(MCT-30), BR 9.7→9.3, The Bushmaster 30mm machine gun is not powerful enough for this BR. I don’t understand why the BR of an armored vehicle equipped with this machine gun is higher than the CV9030FIN, like the Japanese ICV(P) and RCV(P). At least the BR should be the same.
no, it’s fine at 9.0