He means the US T-34.
Move the comparable vehicles up instead.
M41 to 7.0 along side the amx-13
Puma to 5.3 along side the EBR ‘51
Sherman firefly to 5.3 with the Sa50 sherman
M24 to 4.7 since it’s better than the Amx fl11
2 Likes
why put it at 6.7? move it to 13.0 its clearly too op
Ik, the US T34 will probably wreck tiger iis
oh lemme tell you why one by one.
the amx m4 got the pen of an american 105mm aphe but instead of the 20 second reload it’s 6.7. it’s only fair if it gets uptiered to 7.0 to be on the level of tanks like the t44-100.
the EBRs are simple enough. EBR 90 gets the same BR as the AML, amx-13 90. british Eland. I don’t see what the problem is, considering they got the same rounds and the amx is similarly mobile as the rest.
EBR 75 is stupid, i agree,
but the SA-50 is just for where it is. It’s a better sherman firefly. It’s got actual depression and is uptier proof. it’s good where it stands.
m4a1 fl10 is an autoloaded 5s 182mm (pen) slinger. no need to defend that.
and i do agree with the amx13 fl11 being stupidly placed, it’s just a bulldog at a higher br. and the amx13 moving up is also dumb, but you’re defending the wrong things there. more than half the stuff you mentioned isn’t unjust, they’re well placed.
1 Like
T-80UE-1
BR changes: 11.7 to 12.0
Other changes: optional relikt package and 3BM60 available
Those who things taking a su-34 can avoid the ka-50+UE wallet warriors on their team must think the otherwise
This is a joke
The 88A as well as the type 69G II get a 203 angle pen dart.
Phenomenal at 9.0, 57kmph forward speed, composite on the hull, a more effective composite than the t55am as well.
Better turret traverse as well as i believe better optics but might be off there.
Aps doesnt magically make you immune, for a start its specific arc of effect, secondly its not a great aps as , not like the chinese or british one.
You keep saying this and time ans time again ive proved you wrong.
The t55a, amd1 and am1 arent that mobile at all, why do you insist they have “great” mobility its roughly the same Horse power per ton as a damn chieftain.
Dont say thats mobile.
Im not suggesting the tts move up.
Im saying the tts isnt a great 9.0 yet is still miles ahead of the t55AMs
Notice how im not complaining about the 435 moving up? It is capable to go to 9.0, has a 14.5mm machine gun, decent mobility and armour profile as well as a 115mm cannon.
The t55am1 doesnt have the penetration to effectively face off against 10.0s.
But i digress you obviously dislike the tank and would rather see it butchered than balanced.
1 Like
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Tank: Ariete
Change: 11.7 → 11.3, replace DM53 with CL3143
Reasoning: The ariete is worse than any other MBT in the game, since its armor and armor packages are not modelled correctly (Community Bug Reporting System). If those won’t be fixed, then just remove the DM53, give it back its own real round and move it lower in BR.
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Tank: Ariete PSO
Change: 11.7 → 11.3, replace DM53 with CL3143
Reasoning: The ariete PSO is worse than any other MBT in the game, since its armor is not modelled correctly (Community Bug Reporting System). If that won’t be fixed, then just remove the DM53, give it back its own real round and move it lower in BR.
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Tank: Ariete AMV
Change: 12.0 → 11.7, remove DM53 and keep CL3143
Reasoning: The ariete AMV is worse than any other top tier MBT in the game, since its armor is not modelled correctly (Community Bug Reporting System). If that won’t be fixed, then just remove the DM53, keep only its real round and move it lower in BR.
1 Like
Air Realistic Battles
Whirlwind MK1
3.7–> 3.3
I believe it has worse performance than the Whirlwind P.9 (3.7), and significantly less gun ammo which greatly reduces its effectiveness (240 rounds opposed to 484)
3 Likes
i Find the Whirlwind is decent at 3.7, you just need to nail the Hispano aim down (not all that difficult, Hispanos are great), though considering its low BR many more new players will be at it where the limited ammo is a major issue, but BR won’t fix that
Air Realistic Battles
Ju 388J
4.3–> 3.7
The Ju-388J is an interceptor at BR 4.3. However, its airspawn is very low and its climb rate is worse than most fighters at 4.3, at 8.9 M/S on the statcard (which I know isn’t very accurate) but I was being beaten to altitude by conventional fighters. The armament on the Ju 388J is very strong, but incredibly hard to aim, and the schrage musik cannons are very little more than a party trick. Therefore, I believe the 388J should get a better airspawn or move down in BR
2 Likes
true, but theres no reason for it to sit at the same BR as the P.9
where is air spawn/ closer spawn to the centre for A10’s and Su25 for ARB? :(
Pz.IV J
Rank II → Rank III
Generally nearly all the long 75mm armed Pz.IV can use a BR increase, since they have the performance to be able to. While they do require more skill since they are more of a glass cannon compared to T-34’s or M4’s, they have a gun that have better penetration. The Pz.IV J compared to the Pz.IV H, have a tradeoff in regards to its turret rotation, that makes it more balanced for its current BR. However it should still get an increase in rank, so it can be used for daily missions.
4 Likes
Pz.38(t) n.A
Rank I → Rank II
Move it up in rank, and give back its ability to scout. As it currently is in the game, there is no reason to play this thing over the other Pz.38(t).
6 Likes
Germany rank 1 and 2 is full enough, theres no reason to move the 38(T) up to rank 2
Mode: Realistic Battles
Vehicle: AMX-40
BR: 10.0 → 9.7
Reason: I believe there are two big reasons not to move the AMX-40 up in br, at least for now,
Firstly, I believe that the AMX-40 fits very well at 9.7 at the moment. I play quite a bit at the 9.3/9.7 br range with France, Britain, Germany and Russia, and I have never found myself being accused of using an overpowered vehicle in the AMX-40. I think that if you really cared about balance and fairness you’d take a long hard look at vehicles like the CLOVIS or 2S38 rather than a vehicle that, up until now, I have heard 0 complaints about. Many comparisons are made to the Leopard 2k, however I think its important to note the 2k has a better performing round, a stabilized autocannon and much better variable zoom levels on it’s gunner sight. Aside from hard factors like round performance, the 2k also has a good lineup to go along with it, something the AMX-40 would not have if moved up. High winrates and KDs can be pretty easily explained by the fact that French players are generally pretty skilled at the game, simple as that.
Even if we assume that it would be fair to move the AMX-40 up in br, you’re still moving it to a BR with quite literally no lineup to speak of as I mentioned before. I think it would be an understatement to say that it’s not fair to force French players to move their 9.3/9.7 tanks up to 10.0 just so one tank can have a lineup behind it. You already have a very well-rounded 9.7 lineup for france, why ruin it like this? In moving the AMX-40 up to 10.0, you’d not only be nerfing it twice over by placing it at a higher br and depriving it of a br appropriate lineup, you’d also be soft nerfing the entire 9.3/9.7 lineups by forcing them to be artificially moved up in br as well.
4 Likes